DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list

237,418 Views | 3276 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by No Spin Ag
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HTownAg98 said:

Oh there's more to this. This is just…****ing creepy. There are more pictures of the birthday card out there, but I won't post them here because I'd rather not get banned.



Disgusting.

Anyone who knew what Epstein was about, even if they didn't engage in the things he did, but still knew, turned a blind eye, and continued to associate with him, should burn in Hell right there with him.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Gig em G
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I saw some of the full file dump released. There are some very disturbing letters and pictures in there. Some also confirm the intel link some of us have been saying for years now.
JDCAG (NOT Colin)
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jeeper79 said:

Old McDonald said:

Quote:

The Democrats don't care about Epstein. They don't even care about his victims. That's why they were silent about it for years. The only thing they care about is concocting another fake scandal like Russiagate to smear President Trump with lies.

No one is falling for this BS.


they have no defense on Epstein if this is the best Vance has got.

they could end this scandal tomorrow by just releasing the files, but they've made an intentional decision that not releasing them is better for them politically.

think about that. this cover-up, this secrecy, they've decided it's better for them than whatever is actually in the epstein files.
Anyone that knows me around here knows I'm not much of a Trump fan, but where was this outrage from the left when Biden was in office and he didn't release them, either?

So while they may be technically correct, the left cedes all moral authority to make such a request. They don't get to pretend like Trump is doing something wrong when they are their president did the same exact thing with the same exact case. It's not even just similar. It's identical, and it came first.


How about we go after all of them.

If Clinton is implicated in wrong doing, go get him. If big democratic donors were involved, go get them.

My sense on this is that both sides staying quiet is less about innocence of the other side and more about guilt across both sides.

FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fellow Ags there ain't gonna be no more covering for this so stop trying.
JDCAG (NOT Colin)
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

All of this BS over this birthday book signed by a laundry list of big wheel celebrities is nonsense. This was put together in 2003 years before any of the exploits of Epstein were common knowledge. Years before Trump barred Epstein from Mar-a-Lago in October 2007, years before he plead guilty for soliciting an underage prostitute, in 2008. And just for reference according to flight logs and documents released in court proceedings, the last known year Donald Trump flew on Jeffrey Epstein's private jet was 1997 when he flew from PBI to TEB. All the flight's Trump was on occurred between 1993 and 1997, decades before Trump became president and a decade before he tossed Epstein from Mar-a-Lago. This desperate attempt to throw mud on Trump is laughable. And maybe it's just a coincidence that Trump threw Epstein off Mar-a-Lago and in the same month he gave a statement and had meetings with the prosecutor in South Florida that was investigating Epstein for the underage girl, but the timeline is very clear.


This would have been a perfectly reasonable defense for somebody who had been good friends, but cut ties when they found out.

Instead, Trump & co have repeatedly called it a hoax. Said it was all fake. Said it was made up. Now they're claiming it's not his signature, despite several documents from that time period showing the same signature. He says he never doodles, despite have several documents of similar style that he drew and sold publicly.

The problem is the goal posts keep moving.

You don't get to spend all of your energy claiming it is all totally made up and a haox and then, when proof becomes overwhelming, switch to "sure it's real, but it's not a big deal - this is all from way before things got bad".

JDCAG (NOT Colin)
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FWTXAg said:

Fellow Ags there ain't gonna be no more covering for this so stop trying.


There is at least one poster who has yet to chime in who will definitely be covering for Trump. I'm anxious to see their take.
Gig em G
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG



Jeeper79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JDCAG (NOT Colin) said:

Jeeper79 said:

Old McDonald said:

Quote:

The Democrats don't care about Epstein. They don't even care about his victims. That's why they were silent about it for years. The only thing they care about is concocting another fake scandal like Russiagate to smear President Trump with lies.

No one is falling for this BS.


they have no defense on Epstein if this is the best Vance has got.

they could end this scandal tomorrow by just releasing the files, but they've made an intentional decision that not releasing them is better for them politically.

think about that. this cover-up, this secrecy, they've decided it's better for them than whatever is actually in the epstein files.
Anyone that knows me around here knows I'm not much of a Trump fan, but where was this outrage from the left when Biden was in office and he didn't release them, either?

So while they may be technically correct, the left cedes all moral authority to make such a request. They don't get to pretend like Trump is doing something wrong when they are their president did the same exact thing with the same exact case. It's not even just similar. It's identical, and it came first.


How about we go after all of them.

If Clinton is implicated in wrong doing, go get him. If big democratic donors were involved, go get them.

My sense on this is that both sides staying quiet is less about innocence of the other side and more about guilt across both sides.


100%
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieVictor10 said:

will25u said:

Since the other threads got locked.

$10 Billy!




Lol

This is going to be the shortest motion to dismiss ever written.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JDCAG (NOT Colin) said:

FWTXAg said:

Fellow Ags there ain't gonna be no more covering for this so stop trying.


There is at least one poster who has yet to chime in who will definitely be covering for Trump. I'm anxious to see their take.


Patience grasshopper. Takes time to get those talking points drafted and circulated.

I'm Gipper
Hungry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JDCAG (NOT Colin) said:

Jeeper79 said:

Old McDonald said:

Quote:

The Democrats don't care about Epstein. They don't even care about his victims. That's why they were silent about it for years. The only thing they care about is concocting another fake scandal like Russiagate to smear President Trump with lies.

No one is falling for this BS.


they have no defense on Epstein if this is the best Vance has got.

they could end this scandal tomorrow by just releasing the files, but they've made an intentional decision that not releasing them is better for them politically.

think about that. this cover-up, this secrecy, they've decided it's better for them than whatever is actually in the epstein files.
Anyone that knows me around here knows I'm not much of a Trump fan, but where was this outrage from the left when Biden was in office and he didn't release them, either?

So while they may be technically correct, the left cedes all moral authority to make such a request. They don't get to pretend like Trump is doing something wrong when they are their president did the same exact thing with the same exact case. It's not even just similar. It's identical, and it came first.


How about we go after all of them.

If Clinton is implicated in wrong doing, go get him. If big democratic donors were involved, go get them.

My sense on this is that both sides staying quiet is less about innocence of the other side and more about guilt across both sides.


Of course both parties are guilty. This is not a partisan issue. You know who else is guilty? Leaders of other countries. Royal family members. Billionaires. Influential academics. Celebrities. CEOs. Aristocrats. You think Biden or Trump want to implicate themselves and/or their close friends, donors, associates in such a heinous operation? Of course not, that's why neither side has released anything.

The pressure is on Trump because Kash Patel, Pam Bondi, his children, and others close to him banged the "release the files!" drum before and immediately after the election, and now they are calling it a hoax.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dersh been running cover for Epstein for close to three decades. And boy, does he hate the Clinton's! Lol


I'm Gipper
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
As soon as Rogan gets Whitney Webb on the podcast it's curtains for the FBI, CIA, and Mossad.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JDCAG (NOT Colin) said:

Jeeper79 said:

Old McDonald said:

Quote:

The Democrats don't care about Epstein. They don't even care about his victims. That's why they were silent about it for years. The only thing they care about is concocting another fake scandal like Russiagate to smear President Trump with lies.

No one is falling for this BS.


they have no defense on Epstein if this is the best Vance has got.

they could end this scandal tomorrow by just releasing the files, but they've made an intentional decision that not releasing them is better for them politically.

think about that. this cover-up, this secrecy, they've decided it's better for them than whatever is actually in the epstein files.
Anyone that knows me around here knows I'm not much of a Trump fan, but where was this outrage from the left when Biden was in office and he didn't release them, either?

So while they may be technically correct, the left cedes all moral authority to make such a request. They don't get to pretend like Trump is doing something wrong when they are their president did the same exact thing with the same exact case. It's not even just similar. It's identical, and it came first.


How about we go after all of them.

If Clinton is implicated in wrong doing, go get him. If big democratic donors were involved, go get them.

My sense on this is that both sides staying quiet is less about innocence of the other side and more about guilt across both sides.




So much this.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

JDCAG (NOT Colin) said:

FWTXAg said:

Fellow Ags there ain't gonna be no more covering for this so stop trying.


There is at least one poster who has yet to chime in who will definitely be covering for Trump. I'm anxious to see their take.


Patience grasshopper. Takes time to get those talking points drafted and circulated.


When one's views and morals (supposed) are dictated by what their side tells them because tribalism, and not what is right, those people are a waste of oxygen.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
knoxtom
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

Since the thread about this subject was locked....

All I have to say is... GOT'EM!

lolololololollololololol

This is it?

lolololololololololololol
jajajajajajajajajajajaja





That reads like a conversation between gay lovers
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Read a lot of those?

I'm Gipper
Anonymous Source
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
knoxtom said:

will25u said:

Since the thread about this subject was locked....

All I have to say is... GOT'EM!

lolololololollololololol

This is it?

lolololololololololololol
jajajajajajajajajajajaja





That reads like a conversation between gay lovers

Gig 'Em
Gig em G
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FWTXAg said:

As soon as Rogan gets Whitney Webb on the podcast it's curtains for the FBI, CIA, and Mossad.

Peter Thiel and/or Rogan's CIA handler sadly would never allow her to get on the podcast.
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gig em G said:

FWTXAg said:

As soon as Rogan gets Whitney Webb on the podcast it's curtains for the FBI, CIA, and Mossad.

Peter Thiel and/or Rogan's CIA handler sadly would never allow her to get on the podcast.

I don't do the whole qanon reptilian new world order stuff, but if I did... I'd check that Peter fella for a neck zipper first.
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gig em G said:

FWTXAg said:

As soon as Rogan gets Whitney Webb on the podcast it's curtains for the FBI, CIA, and Mossad.

Peter Thiel and/or Rogan's CIA handler sadly would never allow her to get on the podcast.

I hope you're wrong. If Rogan has her on it will blow the entire lid off of this thing. He's souring on Trump, we'll see if he wants to force their hands.
AgDev01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cofeezilla has a video out on the birthday book. Shows some poignant examples in regards to MAGA influences claims on the signature.

FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgDev01 said:

Cofeezilla has a video out on the birthday book. Shows some poignant examples in regards to MAGA influences claims on the signature.




Excellent lol
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whitehouse sticking with "It's not his signature, it's not from Trump".

Ok.
schmendeler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ETFan said:

Whitehouse sticking with "It's not his signature, it's not from Trump".

Ok.


It's amazing how dumb they think his followers are.
AggieVictor10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
schmendeler said:

ETFan said:

Whitehouse sticking with "It's not his signature, it's not from Trump".

Ok.


It's amazing how dumb they think his followers are.


Well to be fair…
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'll be presenting later this evening my scientific analysis of the letter itself, particularly the drawing which is very obvious was not done by Trump.

TexAgs will be the first to see this and I will give permission for it to be shared. Stay tuned!
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bought my tickets. Don't be late!
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
schmendeler said:

ETFan said:

Whitehouse sticking with "It's not his signature, it's not from Trump".

Ok.


It's amazing how dumb they think his followers are.

We dont care
JDCAG (NOT Colin)
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
samurai_science said:

schmendeler said:

ETFan said:

Whitehouse sticking with "It's not his signature, it's not from Trump".

Ok.


It's amazing how dumb they think his followers are.

We dont care


spoiler - we know.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
schmendeler said:

ETFan said:

Whitehouse sticking with "It's not his signature, it's not from Trump".

Ok.


It's amazing how dumb they think his followers are.


They know, they just don't care.

As long as there's anyone on any "other" side, they'll swallow whole whatever they're told to open their mouths for, even if it doesn't benefit, or worse yet, harms them.

Ain't tribalism great.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Taking your official Texags Trump Press Secretary duties seriously today.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ETFan said:

Whitehouse sticking with "It's not his signature, it's not from Trump".

Ok.


There could be a live stream of Trump signing it (I have no clue if he did or not), with all his maga watching and if he turned around and told them it wasn't his signature they'd ditto-head like it was nobody's business.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've asked STAFF to fire up some backup servers.
Geminiv
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No Spin Ag said:

ETFan said:

Whitehouse sticking with "It's not his signature, it's not from Trump".

Ok.


There could be a live stream of Trump signing it (I have no clue if he did or not), with all his maga watching and if he turned around and told them it wasn't his signature they'd ditto-head like it was nobody's business.


That's not even an exaggeration. Lol
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.