***** Official 2026 World Cup Group G Thread *****

15,726 Views | 373 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by PatAg
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Someone in the world had to have made a parlay bet on 4 ties yesterday, right?

Wonder what that payout was.
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Idk but I saw somewhere that someone place near 1m on Spain to win and lost it all
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Group G Standings:
-----------------------Pld---W---D---L---GD----Pts
New Zealand-------1---0---1---0___0----1
Iran---------------------1---0---1---0___0----1
Belgium--------------1---0---1---0___0----1
Egypt------------------1---0---1---0___0----1

Match Day 1 Results:
Belgium 1 : Egypt 1
Iran 2 : New Zealand 2

Sunday, June 21st:

Belgium vs. Iran
2:00 PM CT
SoFi Stadium, Los Angeles, CA
TV: FS1, Telemundo


New Zealand vs. Egypt
8:00 PM CT
BC Place, Vancouver, Canada
TV: FS1, Telemundo

wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lineups for Belgium vs. Iran



Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Those are the strangest player photos ever. It's like they went in a carney Photo Booth and spent $20.
THE_CHOSEN_ONE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We're rooting for Iran here, right?
YokelRidesAgain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
THE_CHOSEN_ONE said:

We're rooting for Iran here, right?

Are they playing t.u.??

Then no.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Iran has oldest lineup in WC history at 32.5 avg.
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Belgium playing with much more intent today
Vox Clamantis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is ugly sloppy football
THE_CHOSEN_ONE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YokelRidesAgain said:

THE_CHOSEN_ONE said:

We're rooting for Iran here, right?

Are they playing t.u.??

Then no.

We could face the winner of this group in round 2, so I'd prefer it to not be Belgium. Go Iran!
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
THE_CHOSEN_ONE said:

YokelRidesAgain said:

THE_CHOSEN_ONE said:

We're rooting for Iran here, right?

Are they playing t.u.??

Then no.

We could face the winner of this group in round 2, so I'd prefer it to not be Belgium. Go Iran!


No doubt. **** the relentlessly self-improving Belgians and their dubious claims to the question mark.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OMG
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That is very clever. It's also offside.
MB19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
THE_CHOSEN_ONE said:

YokelRidesAgain said:

THE_CHOSEN_ONE said:

We're rooting for Iran here, right?

Are they playing t.u.??

Then no.

We could face the winner of this group in round 2, so I'd prefer it to not be Belgium. Go Iran!

Good grief, if we meet Iran in the knockout stages that might become the single most intense game in US sports history.
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Iran strike first. He looks off
boogieman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cheeky play by Iran.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What a set piece!
Russ Dalrymple
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just because I'm a novice on some of these rules, what's the difference between our goal being deemed not offside and this one.
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah off
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Our player was not offside, Iran's was
A is A
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Russ Dalrymple said:

Just because I'm a novice on some of these rules, what's the difference between our goal being deemed not offside and this one.


Our guy wasn't offsides
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mathguy64 said:

That is very clever. It's also offside.

Very, very clever. Iran seems to have mastered tactics in how to get through blockades in all phases.
Russ Dalrymple
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
A is A said:

Russ Dalrymple said:

Just because I'm a novice on some of these rules, what's the difference between our goal being deemed not offside and this one.


Our guy wasn't offsides


Wasn't the argument that it was the goal scorer who wasn't offside?

Was that not the same here? What am I missing.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Russ Dalrymple said:

Just because I'm a novice on some of these rules, what's the difference between our goal being deemed not offside and this one.


That player was offside at the moment it was played. Freeman was clearly onside. Balogun was in an OS position but he didn't play the ball or impact play. Even though the Aussies say he did.
HummingbirdSaltalamacchia
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Russ Dalrymple said:

A is A said:

Russ Dalrymple said:

Just because I'm a novice on some of these rules, what's the difference between our goal being deemed not offside and this one.


Our guy wasn't offsides


Wasn't the argument that it was the goal scorer who wasn't offside?

Was that not the same here? What am I missing.


From the replays, the upper body/shoulders of the Iranian player were in front of the last Belgian defender at the moment the ball was kicked. Unlike ours, where he was noticeable behind
Vox Clamantis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Russ Dalrymple said:

A is A said:

Russ Dalrymple said:

Just because I'm a novice on some of these rules, what's the difference between our goal being deemed not offside and this one.


Our guy wasn't offsides


Wasn't the argument that it was the goal scorer who wasn't offside?

Was that not the same here? What am I missing.


There are a bunch of rules about how the players have to behave when they're in a wall. Iran pushed off and had too many players in the wall to be that tight.

On our goal, many people saw one of our players massively offsides during the Freeman header, but he didn't touch the ball, so it wasn't applicable, freeman was about 3 foot onside.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I hate goals being called back for being fractionally offside. He wasn't gaining an unfair advantage, he reacted faster.
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Alex Freeman was never offside



Unfortunately for Taremi and Iran, he did too many squats and his ass is marginally offside. He's the one at the top

Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

I hate goals being called back for being fractionally offside. He wasn't gaining an unfair advantage, he reacted faster.


That's how he gained an unfair advantage.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He leaned first, who cares.

I get that we call offside now by measuring inches, and it's dumb.
Vox Clamantis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Belgium looks awful
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

He leaned first, who cares.

I get that we call offside now by measuring inches, and it's dumb.

Well, then it becomes where do you draw the line? Its easier to just declare offsides if any part of you is rather than get into a debate of distance if they decided to make it 6 in, 12 in, etc.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

He leaned first, who cares.

I get that we call offside now by measuring inches, and it's dumb.

By leaning first he was offside
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.