Quote:
That's the beauty of it. It doesn't matter what you or anyone else thinks. He's still the Prez.
Jim Jones MFer
________________________________________________________
DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list
237,066 Views |
3271 Replies |
Last: 11 hrs ago by flown-the-coop
Jim Jones MFer
So I present the irrefutable evidence Trump did not draw the alleged drawing.
It bothered me since the first images of the alleged drawing surfaced. I removed the wording as there is literally no way to verify if DJT typed those words or otherwise caused them to be typed or approved of what is typed.
This is about the actual drawing. The breasts are just not right. What do I mean by that? Well, it is very well documented Trump is a man of breasts. But not just any breasts, he prefers them to be large, well-rounded and matching in size and structure. As you would expect of a man who loves big, some may say yuge, beautiful things. And his architectural eye cannot tolerate assymetry.
This all known fact and can be verified through AI.
As you will see in the diagram below, the top markings, which I have marked with an "A", are the original as Trump allegedly drew them. But he would never, ever do such a thing. If he was going to draft this note to Epstein and put his signature on it, then he would have gotten this right. Pretty flippin clear to me.
Trump lives squarely in the Orange Zone of B, C/D and maybe an E+ if he is feeling a bit stormy. But A he detests and is well known for requiring his mistresses and wives to have plastic surgery, in particularly breast enlargement.
For added reference, I added in NP size and the disgustingly droopy EJC to dismiss any notion that Trump had a thing for nasty old women. He doesn't, he hates them.
P.S. The placement of the signature becomes more apparent. I did NOT alter that placement. So either a very clever thing Trump did or pointing more and more that this was constructed (I conceded he may have had it done, asked someone to do it, or approved it and that it is "authentic" - but thats a stretch).
Respectfully,
flown-the-coop
Defender of Trump, Established Expert in Mammaries
It bothered me since the first images of the alleged drawing surfaced. I removed the wording as there is literally no way to verify if DJT typed those words or otherwise caused them to be typed or approved of what is typed.
This is about the actual drawing. The breasts are just not right. What do I mean by that? Well, it is very well documented Trump is a man of breasts. But not just any breasts, he prefers them to be large, well-rounded and matching in size and structure. As you would expect of a man who loves big, some may say yuge, beautiful things. And his architectural eye cannot tolerate assymetry.
This all known fact and can be verified through AI.
As you will see in the diagram below, the top markings, which I have marked with an "A", are the original as Trump allegedly drew them. But he would never, ever do such a thing. If he was going to draft this note to Epstein and put his signature on it, then he would have gotten this right. Pretty flippin clear to me.
Trump lives squarely in the Orange Zone of B, C/D and maybe an E+ if he is feeling a bit stormy. But A he detests and is well known for requiring his mistresses and wives to have plastic surgery, in particularly breast enlargement.
For added reference, I added in NP size and the disgustingly droopy EJC to dismiss any notion that Trump had a thing for nasty old women. He doesn't, he hates them.
P.S. The placement of the signature becomes more apparent. I did NOT alter that placement. So either a very clever thing Trump did or pointing more and more that this was constructed (I conceded he may have had it done, asked someone to do it, or approved it and that it is "authentic" - but thats a stretch).
Respectfully,
flown-the-coop
Defender of Trump, Established Expert in Mammaries
Flown-the-coop is a Aggie "spook/fed"
________________________________________________________
And as you critique my theory let me add a couple of additional thoughts.
Keep in mind my science is just as solid as Coffeezilla and his "signature analysis" and laughable analysis of Trump "phrasing".
The signature may be real, may not be. Trump is probably the most widely circulated signature outside of professional sports. And he has physically signed Pete Rose levels of items - and has for decades also like Pete Rose. Does not make it a forgery, but people should not believe themselves to be signature experts looking at images of images from decades ago.
BTW - Who has the original book? Was that provided to Congress or just a copy?
Still waiting explanation about why this is just now coming up. Nothing is ever by accident.
Keep in mind my science is just as solid as Coffeezilla and his "signature analysis" and laughable analysis of Trump "phrasing".
The signature may be real, may not be. Trump is probably the most widely circulated signature outside of professional sports. And he has physically signed Pete Rose levels of items - and has for decades also like Pete Rose. Does not make it a forgery, but people should not believe themselves to be signature experts looking at images of images from decades ago.
BTW - Who has the original book? Was that provided to Congress or just a copy?
Still waiting explanation about why this is just now coming up. Nothing is ever by accident.
Good theory, but maybe they are meant to look prepubescent given the audience.
I'm Gipper
I'm Gipper
Gig em G said:
Flown-the-coop is a Aggie "spook/fed"
I am an Aggie but I am as pale as the Fool Moon. I am well fed though.
Im Gipper said:
Good theory, but maybe they are meant to look prepubescent given the audience.
Further confirmation Trump was not involved in that way with Epstein if so.
But why do that and then place the "signature" where he allegedly did?
Sorry, that doesn't confirm anything.
I'm Gipper
I'm Gipper
You made the comment regarding prepubescence, which doesn't jive given his signature placement.
So your comment is confirmed as invalid, thus the insinuation he drew it purposely with knowledge of Epsteins crimes is also invalid.
My science remains unrefuted.
So your comment is confirmed as invalid, thus the insinuation he drew it purposely with knowledge of Epsteins crimes is also invalid.
My science remains unrefuted.
Try reading!
I'm Gipper
I'm Gipper
ETFan said:
Bought my tickets. Don't be late!
I want a refund
JDCAG (NOT Colin) said:samurai_science said:schmendeler said:ETFan said:
Whitehouse sticking with "It's not his signature, it's not from Trump".
Ok.
It's amazing how dumb they think his followers are.
We dont care
spoiler - we know.
Not a cult.
REPORTER: Did you sign Epstein's birthday letter?
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) September 9, 2025
TRUMP: It's not my signature. And it's not the way I speak. And anyone who knows me for a long time knows that's not my language. And frankly you're wasting your time. pic.twitter.com/M5jM0iIyac
Thank you for more lies Mr president, we love it.
Insanity.
The JpMorgan implications should be the least our govt should investigate, the SAR's in this case are overwhelming, and this is truly alarming on so many levels.
children: abusedtechno-ag said:
That's the beauty of it. It doesn't matter what you or anyone else thinks. He's still the Prez.
abusers: protected
libs: owned
Old McDonald said:children: abusedtechno-ag said:
That's the beauty of it. It doesn't matter what you or anyone else thinks. He's still the Prez.
abusers: protected
libs: owned
It's sad to see that there are people in this country who, so long as libs get "owned" will gleefully protect abusers of children.
It makes me wonder if those same people call themselves "Christians". I say, call, because there's no way Christ would look kindly on those individuals knowing what he knows of their heart and inner thoughts.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
No Spin Ag now judging whether others are Christian because the are not releasing information in accordance with your timeline regardless of whether there are ongoing investigations or whether there is even the information you "think" is there is there.
As much as you think it's not "Christian" what you call for is not American.
Judge lest not ye be judged. Spin lest not ye be spun.
As much as you think it's not "Christian" what you call for is not American.
Judge lest not ye be judged. Spin lest not ye be spun.
Burpelson said:
The JpMorgan implications should be the least our govt should investigate, the SAR's in this case are overwhelming, and this is truly alarming on so many levels.
You care to expound on these SARs? And it's well known the FBI only investigates certain folk. See lack of SAR follow-ups on the Biden Crime Family and let's compare to the corrupt release of everything DJT related including his tax records.
But yea, it's Trump at the head of this grand conspiracy.
And if you cared about sex trafficking you would not have voted for Biden / Kamala.
flown-the-coop said:
No Spin Ag now judging whether others are Christian because the are not releasing information in accordance with your timeline regardless of whether there are ongoing investigations or whether there is even the information you "think" is there is there.
As much as you think it's not "Christian" what you call for is not American.
Judge lest not ye be judged. Spin lest not ye be spun.
It's over bud. At this point we're just waiting for the next shoe to drop.
Sure... bud.
Can you show us on your dolly where the first shoe dropped?
Can you show us on your dolly where the first shoe dropped?
flown-the-coop said:
No Spin Ag now judging whether others are Christian because the are not releasing information in accordance with your timeline regardless of whether there are ongoing investigations or whether there is even the information you "think" is there is there.
As much as you think it's not "Christian" what you call for is not American.
Judge lest not ye be judged. Spin lest not ye be spun.
I have no problem being judged.
I'm not a hypocrite or one doing everything possible to excuse or turn an blind eye to sexual predators of children being protected by evidence in the form of a list of names being released.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
No Spin Ag said:flown-the-coop said:
No Spin Ag now judging whether others are Christian because the are not releasing information in accordance with your timeline regardless of whether there are ongoing investigations or whether there is even the information you "think" is there is there.
As much as you think it's not "Christian" what you call for is not American.
Judge lest not ye be judged. Spin lest not ye be spun.
I have no problem being judged.
I'm not a hypocrite or one doing everything possible to excuse or turn an blind eye to sexual predators of children being protected by evidence in the form of a list of names being released.
Can you reference your no spin on sex trafficking in general or only when it is Trump and friends?
Do you have evidence or more innuendo that Trump is "hiding" information or "protecting" evidence and people?
Just more spin from the no spin zone.
flown-the-coop said:No Spin Ag said:flown-the-coop said:
No Spin Ag now judging whether others are Christian because the are not releasing information in accordance with your timeline regardless of whether there are ongoing investigations or whether there is even the information you "think" is there is there.
As much as you think it's not "Christian" what you call for is not American.
Judge lest not ye be judged. Spin lest not ye be spun.
I have no problem being judged.
I'm not a hypocrite or one doing everything possible to excuse or turn an blind eye to sexual predators of children being protected by evidence in the form of a list of names being released.
Can you reference your no spin on sex trafficking in general or only when it is Trump and friends?
Do you have evidence or more innuendo that Trump is "hiding" information or "protecting" evidence and people?
Just more spin from the no spin zone.
I just don't know why everyone, especially Christians with children, wouldn't want all the evidence to be released.
If the evidence leads to the imprisonment of Dems, I'm more than happy to throw them in there myself.
The same should be said by maga Christians. At least one would think they'd want justice for those in the Epstein files.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
No Spin Ag said:flown-the-coop said:No Spin Ag said:flown-the-coop said:
No Spin Ag now judging whether others are Christian because the are not releasing information in accordance with your timeline regardless of whether there are ongoing investigations or whether there is even the information you "think" is there is there.
As much as you think it's not "Christian" what you call for is not American.
Judge lest not ye be judged. Spin lest not ye be spun.
I have no problem being judged.
I'm not a hypocrite or one doing everything possible to excuse or turn an blind eye to sexual predators of children being protected by evidence in the form of a list of names being released.
Can you reference your no spin on sex trafficking in general or only when it is Trump and friends?
Do you have evidence or more innuendo that Trump is "hiding" information or "protecting" evidence and people?
Just more spin from the no spin zone.
I just don't know why everyone, especially Christians with children, wouldn't want all the evidence to be released.
If the evidence leads to the imprisonment of Dems, I'm more than happy to throw them in there myself.
The same should be said by maga Christians. At least one would think they'd want justice for those in the Epstein files.
Tribalism.
It has gotten the better part of human nature since before Jesus Christ walked out of the grave. Unfortunately even our government protecting an underage sex trafficking espionage operation can't break the spell for many, I don't think anything ever will.
Old McDonald said:children: abusedtechno-ag said:
That's the beauty of it. It doesn't matter what you or anyone else thinks. He's still the Prez.
abusers: protected
libs: owned
It's sad you cared not a whit about those children when Hidin' Biden was president.
I'll pray for you.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Hopefully your prayers also include those that no longer give a whit about any of those children.
I'm Gipper
I'm Gipper
Im Gipper said:
Hopefully your prayers also include those that no longer give a whit about any of those children.
I pray for Democrats all the time.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
techno-ag said:Im Gipper said:
Hopefully your prayers also include those that no longer give a whit about any of those children.
I pray for Democrats all the time.
The Republicans could use your prayers also. Why leave them off?
I'm Gipper
it's sadder you stopped caring when trump became presidenttechno-ag said:
It's sad you cared not a whit about those children when Hidin' Biden was president.
I'll pray for you.
Why is it so hard to let go? Why have people so vehemently attached themselves to a damn politician? WTF?
When the info comes out and it includes Clinton, or Biden, or Hunter or whatever tickles your goat, I'll look at it and go "got em".
That's all there is to it? Arrest the perps. The end.
When the info comes out and it includes Clinton, or Biden, or Hunter or whatever tickles your goat, I'll look at it and go "got em".
That's all there is to it? Arrest the perps. The end.
No Spin Ag said:flown-the-coop said:No Spin Ag said:flown-the-coop said:
No Spin Ag now judging whether others are Christian because the are not releasing information in accordance with your timeline regardless of whether there are ongoing investigations or whether there is even the information you "think" is there is there.
As much as you think it's not "Christian" what you call for is not American.
Judge lest not ye be judged. Spin lest not ye be spun.
I have no problem being judged.
I'm not a hypocrite or one doing everything possible to excuse or turn an blind eye to sexual predators of children being protected by evidence in the form of a list of names being released.
Can you reference your no spin on sex trafficking in general or only when it is Trump and friends?
Do you have evidence or more innuendo that Trump is "hiding" information or "protecting" evidence and people?
Just more spin from the no spin zone.
I just don't know why everyone, especially Christians with children, wouldn't want all the evidence to be released.
If the evidence leads to the imprisonment of Dems, I'm more than happy to throw them in there myself.
The same should be said by maga Christians. At least one would think they'd want justice for those in the Epstein files.
Which MAGA people have you seen oppose the release of the Epstein files? Certainly not me, in fact I have repeatedly called for the opposite.
In fact, I have seen NO ONE on f16 nor have I heard any of the talking heads say not to release the files.
Dems are absolutely complicit in the sex trafficking of children. See Biden admins open borders. I haven't seen one lib or one cm or one TDSer speak of this.
In fact, its generally the most MAGA who say kill all child sex predators and let god sort em out.
So again, do you have evidence of MAGA folk wanting to block the release of any information?
FWTXAg said:No Spin Ag said:flown-the-coop said:No Spin Ag said:flown-the-coop said:
No Spin Ag now judging whether others are Christian because the are not releasing information in accordance with your timeline regardless of whether there are ongoing investigations or whether there is even the information you "think" is there is there.
As much as you think it's not "Christian" what you call for is not American.
Judge lest not ye be judged. Spin lest not ye be spun.
I have no problem being judged.
I'm not a hypocrite or one doing everything possible to excuse or turn an blind eye to sexual predators of children being protected by evidence in the form of a list of names being released.
Can you reference your no spin on sex trafficking in general or only when it is Trump and friends?
Do you have evidence or more innuendo that Trump is "hiding" information or "protecting" evidence and people?
Just more spin from the no spin zone.
I just don't know why everyone, especially Christians with children, wouldn't want all the evidence to be released.
If the evidence leads to the imprisonment of Dems, I'm more than happy to throw them in there myself.
The same should be said by maga Christians. At least one would think they'd want justice for those in the Epstein files.
Tribalism.
It has gotten the better part of human nature since before Jesus Christ walked out of the grave. Unfortunately even our government protecting an underage sex trafficking espionage operation can't break the spell for many, I don't think anything ever will.
Take it to the Religion conspiracy qAnon board with that crap.
Old McDonald said:techno-ag said:
It's sad you cared not a whit about those children when Hidin' Biden was president.
I'll pray for you.
it's sadder you stopped caring when trump became president
At least he cared about it at some point. You still don't care about the victims, just the tabloid fodder regarding Trump.
If you really, really cared, you would have held Biden and Mayorkas accountable for their crimes in this area that are quite literally over 1000 times worse.
But instead, you make it all about Trump. Disgusting behavior.
EDIT: No reason for me to be poking, sorry! Lunch hit right, guess I was hangry.
Every offical surrounding trump is bold-faced lying. I can't get over it.
Every offical surrounding trump is bold-faced lying. I can't get over it.
flown-the-coop said:No Spin Ag said:flown-the-coop said:No Spin Ag said:flown-the-coop said:
No Spin Ag now judging whether others are Christian because the are not releasing information in accordance with your timeline regardless of whether there are ongoing investigations or whether there is even the information you "think" is there is there.
As much as you think it's not "Christian" what you call for is not American.
Judge lest not ye be judged. Spin lest not ye be spun.
I have no problem being judged.
I'm not a hypocrite or one doing everything possible to excuse or turn an blind eye to sexual predators of children being protected by evidence in the form of a list of names being released.
Can you reference your no spin on sex trafficking in general or only when it is Trump and friends?
Do you have evidence or more innuendo that Trump is "hiding" information or "protecting" evidence and people?
Just more spin from the no spin zone.
I just don't know why everyone, especially Christians with children, wouldn't want all the evidence to be released.
If the evidence leads to the imprisonment of Dems, I'm more than happy to throw them in there myself.
The same should be said by maga Christians. At least one would think they'd want justice for those in the Epstein files.
Which MAGA people have you seen oppose the release of the Epstein files? Certainly not me, in fact I have repeatedly called for the opposite.
In fact, I have seen NO ONE on f16 nor have I heard any of the talking heads say not to release the files.
Dems are absolutely complicit in the sex trafficking of children. See Biden admins open borders. I haven't seen one lib or one cm or one TDSer speak of this.
In fact, its generally the most MAGA who say kill all child sex predators and let god sort em out.
So again, do you have evidence of MAGA folk wanting to block the release of any information?
So maga wants Trump to release the files and will even join the other people on the right who have been calling for the release for years?
I never said maga is actively blocking, they're just doing the "well, Biden should've done it so why are people wanting Trump to do it." They could be saying, "that effing Biden didn't release them, but now with Trump in, we're gonna make sure he does like he said he would."
And I'm glad you're on the right side of history where people want Trump to release the files now and don't see any reason why he shouldn't.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Featured Stories
See All
SEC Round-Up: Lack of horse sense could put Napier out to pasture
by Olin Buchanan
12:08
14h ago
2.7k
Players to Watch: No. 16 Texas A&M at No. 8 Notre Dame
by Olin Buchanan
19:51
18h ago
4.4k
Presenting Texas Aggies United’s Bad Tigers Sweepstakes!
by Texas Aggies United
lockett93
apparently Maroon was a controversial color for Lambeau tonight
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
6