Posted on the other thread.
Deja Vu of 1987.
Deja Vu of 1987.
tamc93 said:
Watching as well since my daughter is up staying on LBJ this weekend.
As of now, LCRA is not expecting flood operations and the storm seems to be moving (albeit very slowly).
Stay safe and aware.
Flood operation link:
https://hydromet.lcra.org/floodstatus#linksl
Rainfall / Stream Link:
https://hydromet.lcra.org/
Gator92 said:
Pic sent to me from my DPS high water rescue buddy.
Gunny456 said:
Agree. That was a bad deal. We had a place in Chevy Cove for around 25 years. Both my mom and dad and my uncle.
Be safe sir.
This morning the Llano was flowing at 65 cfs. Current flow is 96,661 cfs. LBJ will catch all of this. Last time it was this high, LBJ lost the bridge on the Llano Fork.HumpitPuryear said:tamc93 said:
Watching as well since my daughter is up staying on LBJ this weekend.
As of now, LCRA is not expecting flood operations and the storm seems to be moving (albeit very slowly).
Stay safe and aware.
Flood operation link:
https://hydromet.lcra.org/floodstatus#linksl
Rainfall / Stream Link:
https://hydromet.lcra.org/
I have no confidence in LCRA after 2018 fiasco. There's no reason not to drop LBJ a bit to prepare for the llano surge. Travis is low and could use the flow anyway. We are on Chevy Cove this weekend and making plans to protect boats from a rise. Should be nothing like 2018 though.
Llano up to 109K CFS near Mason, still going up.mwlkr said:This morning the Llano was flowing at 65 cfs. Current flow is 96,661 cfs. LBJ will catch all of this. Last time it was this high, LBJ lost the bridge on the Llano Fork.HumpitPuryear said:tamc93 said:
Watching as well since my daughter is up staying on LBJ this weekend.
As of now, LCRA is not expecting flood operations and the storm seems to be moving (albeit very slowly).
Stay safe and aware.
Flood operation link:
https://hydromet.lcra.org/floodstatus#linksl
Rainfall / Stream Link:
https://hydromet.lcra.org/
I have no confidence in LCRA after 2018 fiasco. There's no reason not to drop LBJ a bit to prepare for the llano surge. Travis is low and could use the flow anyway. We are on Chevy Cove this weekend and making plans to protect boats from a rise. Should be nothing like 2018 though.
Complete Idiot said:Llano up to 109K CFS near Mason, still going up.mwlkr said:This morning the Llano was flowing at 65 cfs. Current flow is 96,661 cfs. LBJ will catch all of this. Last time it was this high, LBJ lost the bridge on the Llano Fork.HumpitPuryear said:tamc93 said:
Watching as well since my daughter is up staying on LBJ this weekend.
As of now, LCRA is not expecting flood operations and the storm seems to be moving (albeit very slowly).
Stay safe and aware.
Flood operation link:
https://hydromet.lcra.org/floodstatus#linksl
Rainfall / Stream Link:
https://hydromet.lcra.org/
I have no confidence in LCRA after 2018 fiasco. There's no reason not to drop LBJ a bit to prepare for the llano surge. Travis is low and could use the flow anyway. We are on Chevy Cove this weekend and making plans to protect boats from a rise. Should be nothing like 2018 though.
Gunny456 said:
Did you guys eat at the Lakehouse Restaurant by chance?
Friend of mine in Kerrville knows the owner and he said it has water in the restaurant.
And it went over the spillway for the better part of 3 weeksHumbleAg04 said:Deus Vult said:
The news just said the Guadalupe is flowing at 166000 cu ft per second. That is just a crazy amount of moving water. Thank goodness Canyon Lake is in the way to absorb some of this before it gets to New Braunfels and Seguin.
Some slightly drunk rough math shows at that rate lake will fill to pool in ~12 hours of that flow. Wild how much water it will hold. Also wild to think how much water moved in 2002 to go over the spillway.
Complete Idiot said:Llano up to 109K CFS near Mason, still going up.mwlkr said:This morning the Llano was flowing at 65 cfs. Current flow is 96,661 cfs. LBJ will catch all of this. Last time it was this high, LBJ lost the bridge on the Llano Fork.HumpitPuryear said:tamc93 said:
Watching as well since my daughter is up staying on LBJ this weekend.
As of now, LCRA is not expecting flood operations and the storm seems to be moving (albeit very slowly).
Stay safe and aware.
Flood operation link:
https://hydromet.lcra.org/floodstatus#linksl
Rainfall / Stream Link:
https://hydromet.lcra.org/
I have no confidence in LCRA after 2018 fiasco. There's no reason not to drop LBJ a bit to prepare for the llano surge. Travis is low and could use the flow anyway. We are on Chevy Cove this weekend and making plans to protect boats from a rise. Should be nothing like 2018 though.
HumpitPuryear said:Complete Idiot said:Llano up to 109K CFS near Mason, still going up.mwlkr said:This morning the Llano was flowing at 65 cfs. Current flow is 96,661 cfs. LBJ will catch all of this. Last time it was this high, LBJ lost the bridge on the Llano Fork.HumpitPuryear said:tamc93 said:
Watching as well since my daughter is up staying on LBJ this weekend.
As of now, LCRA is not expecting flood operations and the storm seems to be moving (albeit very slowly).
Stay safe and aware.
Flood operation link:
https://hydromet.lcra.org/floodstatus#linksl
Rainfall / Stream Link:
https://hydromet.lcra.org/
I have no confidence in LCRA after 2018 fiasco. There's no reason not to drop LBJ a bit to prepare for the llano surge. Travis is low and could use the flow anyway. We are on Chevy Cove this weekend and making plans to protect boats from a rise. Should be nothing like 2018 though.
We've blown past the forecast of 25' crest at Mason at over 28'. Hearing rumors that LCRA has opened gates now.
HumbleAg04 said:Deus Vult said:
The news just said the Guadalupe is flowing at 166000 cu ft per second. That is just a crazy amount of moving water. Thank goodness Canyon Lake is in the way to absorb some of this before it gets to New Braunfels and Seguin.
Some slightly drunk rough math shows at that rate lake will fill to pool in ~12 hours of that flow. Wild how much water it will hold. Also wild to think how much water moved in 2002 to go over the spillway.
HTownAg98 said:HumpitPuryear said:Complete Idiot said:Llano up to 109K CFS near Mason, still going up.mwlkr said:This morning the Llano was flowing at 65 cfs. Current flow is 96,661 cfs. LBJ will catch all of this. Last time it was this high, LBJ lost the bridge on the Llano Fork.HumpitPuryear said:tamc93 said:
Watching as well since my daughter is up staying on LBJ this weekend.
As of now, LCRA is not expecting flood operations and the storm seems to be moving (albeit very slowly).
Stay safe and aware.
Flood operation link:
https://hydromet.lcra.org/floodstatus#linksl
Rainfall / Stream Link:
https://hydromet.lcra.org/
I have no confidence in LCRA after 2018 fiasco. There's no reason not to drop LBJ a bit to prepare for the llano surge. Travis is low and could use the flow anyway. We are on Chevy Cove this weekend and making plans to protect boats from a rise. Should be nothing like 2018 though.
We've blown past the forecast of 25' crest at Mason at over 28'. Hearing rumors that LCRA has opened gates now.
Will be opening gates this afternoon.
https://hydromet.lcra.org/floodstatus
Gunny456 said:
Hope you're right. They will be way behind the curve again if they wait too long.
Captain Winky said:
I don't understand the wording of that message. It says everyone is accounted for at two camping locations, but then says if someone hasn't been accounted for, you have been contacted. Are there other camp sites? Hoping I am just misreading this and everyone is safe.
Jason_Roofer said:Captain Winky said:
I don't understand the wording of that message. It says everyone is accounted for at two camping locations, but then says if someone hasn't been accounted for, you have been contacted. Are there other camp sites? Hoping I am just misreading this and everyone is safe.
It's poorly worded. I had to read it four times to understand. If you aren't familiar with their setup, it makes it hard to understand and sounds like all is well, or might be, or maybe not. That's why the judge screwed up the relay.
Not sure at this point how many are actually accounted for.