SUag said:
There will likely be a strong viable mass of return campers to places like La Junta regardless of location, but how can you think the new camper family pool will not be dramatically shrunk if kept where it is? First level research will go from one isolated child abuse story 20+ years ago to biblical death flood in the area as recent as it could be.
Personally, if I were a camp owner, I would move the camp to a non-flood risk lake front asap and try to get as much support from the alumni to help fund it and otherwise transition.
I think that's the only way they can continue. I imagine any of these camps couldn't renew their GL until all of the litigation works itself out.
And I'm not sure they could operate until the litigation without having to fight through some sort of injunction. I'm not an attorney (I'm sure it's obvious after you reading this)
But I bet the camps don't have the liquid assets to cover the hundreds of thousands of dollars or millions in legal fees needed to get through to the other side. Moving locations or drastically improving the locations in order for an insurance company to be satisfied I think will be the only way.
La junta and mystic have a very wealthy, connected and motivated alumni base so, who knows.
Camps are needed - but the world has changed and unfortunately this is another event that proves that point. It's just sad all around.