Kimmel Pulled Off Air Indefinitely

36,128 Views | 965 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by maroon barchetta
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
IMO, this is a fair/accurate read. Granted, I obviously support certain digs of his more than you, but overall he absolutely showed humility, grace, and genuine emotion. I thought the end was especially powerful when he talked about Erika/forgiveness/Jesus, and seemed to do with sincerity.

I also think you touched on the biggest takeaway, which is that "he is obviously not a ghoul and does indeed have humanity." I know the left goes WAY overboard in their rhetoric, excuses a ton of **** on their own side, weaponizes empathy to an insane degree, etc, but most of those on the left whom I know, at least, are good, decent people who ultimately want the same things we all want. That's why I can't stand blanket remarks like "the left is evil" or "the left killed Charlie Kirk." Are there evil people on the left? Yes, 100%. But most of them have humanity, treat people with kindness, have a soul, etc, they just have different (or sometimes flat out wrong) views of how to achieve the things we all want. Which is how I've always viewed Kimmel (that, and I actually do find him the funniest of the current, nightly late night hosts, which is blasphemy to some, I know).

Anyway, I just wanted to acknowledge the olive branch (even though I sit somewhere in the middle between the right and left) in the spirit of trying to find some common ground here.
RogerFurlong
How long do you want to ignore this user?
maroon barchetta said:

RogerFurlong said:

maroon barchetta said:

It's funny you think Trump can stay up that late.

You don't think trump stays up late? This may be the dumbest post I've ever seen. (Sorry if you were joking)


If you don't know if it's a joke, I'm not going to explain it to you.

Sometimes it's best not to explain a failed joke. It just makes you look dumb.
GoAgs92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"Which is how I've always viewed Kimmel (that, and I actually do find him the funniest of the current, nightly late night hosts, "

That's not saying a whole lot, they are all pretty milquetoast carbon copies of each other. Although, I have a job so only see a minute of their monologue before bedtime so who knows maybe their interviews are good.

I don't think he should have been taken off the air for what he said, but I do understand why they did. I am glad the show wasn't cancelled, it should be cancelled for crap ratings not for some confusing statement.

Probably the best thing that ever happened to him ratings wise.

Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What is the business model between the local affiliate and the network?

Do the local affiliates pay a fee per network show, or do they just pay one fee, and they pick and choose what network content they want to put on there? I've never understood this relationship.

I've always wondered more about the sporting event aspect as well, like when they preempt a network show to broadcast a state football game or what are the rules on choosing which NFL game to show (besides the local team and blackout rules).
Zombie Jon Snow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Meh.

Somewhat felt sincere, in a few very brief personal moments. Do I think he meant to have it reflect on Charlie Kirk or Erika? No.

But he meant to disparage the right and their followers in a very broad sense. Which is still an attack and at the very least very ill timed.

And he never apologized. Just said he never intended it that way. And mostly was talking about government censorship issue which wasn't even the point and not why he was suspended. Just making out trump and the administration as monsters, so business as usual. Even a casual german reference to remind people that this is a fascist country now.

Nothing changed. Still bashing the right at least politically and that's where things like crossing the line in your rhetoric can lead to people acting violently.

Good riddance I can't wait for the day he is actually fired or cancelled for ratings (not censorship). And I can now resume never watching him.
Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fig96 said:

Sea Speed said:

I've read in a couple places that family feud last week got more viewers than Kimmel was getting. Haven't seen the actual numbers, but did see Brian stelter try and spin it, so that tells me it's probably true.
I saw something yesterday that mentioned a ton of his reach came via people watching clips on YouTube, where he does have over 20 million followers. No idea as to the accuracy but looks like multimillion views on some recent videos so seems possible.

Traffic from the past few days also isn't likely representative of the average.


Yeah, the argument that Kimmel has low ratings is a bit flawed because all these types of shows have low ratings in the traditional sense.

However, Kimmel has more YouTube subs than Joe Rogan. I saw someone say that on social media and didn't believe it so I went and looked it up myself.

That's prob a big driver in why he's back. He's still pretty "popular".
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Macarthur said:

fig96 said:

Sea Speed said:

I've read in a couple places that family feud last week got more viewers than Kimmel was getting. Haven't seen the actual numbers, but did see Brian stelter try and spin it, so that tells me it's probably true.
I saw something yesterday that mentioned a ton of his reach came via people watching clips on YouTube, where he does have over 20 million followers. No idea as to the accuracy but looks like multimillion views on some recent videos so seems possible.

Traffic from the past few days also isn't likely representative of the average.


Yeah, the argument that Kimmel has low ratings is a bit flawed because all these types of shows have low ratings in the traditional sense.

However, Kimmel has more YouTube subs than Joe Rogan. I saw someone say that on social media and didn't believe it so I went and looked it up myself.

That's prob a big driver in why he's back. He's still pretty "popular".


Kimmel has/had worse ratings than Colbert and Colbert was losing $40M per year. Assuming Kimmel's cost inputs for production are roughly similar to Colbert's, I would be shocked if his contract is renewed in May 2026. Kimmel's ratings are going to be totally irrelevant if he's losing money especially in light of Iger's public comments about improving profitability.
cajunaggie08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Macarthur said:

fig96 said:

Sea Speed said:

I've read in a couple places that family feud last week got more viewers than Kimmel was getting. Haven't seen the actual numbers, but did see Brian stelter try and spin it, so that tells me it's probably true.

I saw something yesterday that mentioned a ton of his reach came via people watching clips on YouTube, where he does have over 20 million followers. No idea as to the accuracy but looks like multimillion views on some recent videos so seems possible.

Traffic from the past few days also isn't likely representative of the average.


Yeah, the argument that Kimmel has low ratings is a bit flawed because all these types of shows have low ratings in the traditional sense.

However, Kimmel has more YouTube subs than Joe Rogan. I saw someone say that on social media and didn't believe it so I went and looked it up myself.

That's prob a big driver in why he's back. He's still pretty "popular".


Kimmel has/had worse ratings than Colbert and Colbert was losing $40M per year. Assuming Kimmel's cost inputs for production are roughly similar to Colbert's, I would be shocked if his contract is renewed in May 2026. Kimmel's ratings are going to be totally irrelevant if he's losing money especially in light of Iger's public comments about improving profitability.

That's also assuming Colbert operating at a $40M annual loss is accurate. I feel like with all of these programs being available on streaming apps and youtube, its possible to make any show look like its reporting profits or losses depending on what message you're trying to sell.
RogerFurlong
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cajunaggie08 said:

That's also assuming Colbert operating at a $40M annual loss is accurate. I feel like with all of these programs being available on streaming apps and youtube, its possible to make any show look like its reporting profits or losses depending on what message you're trying to sell.

Hollywood Accounting. There's no way they lost 40 million a year and it took that long for a late night talk show to get canceled. Couldn't even be a loss leader into whatever comes on after these shows.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cajunaggie08 said:

YouBet said:

Macarthur said:

fig96 said:

Sea Speed said:

I've read in a couple places that family feud last week got more viewers than Kimmel was getting. Haven't seen the actual numbers, but did see Brian stelter try and spin it, so that tells me it's probably true.

I saw something yesterday that mentioned a ton of his reach came via people watching clips on YouTube, where he does have over 20 million followers. No idea as to the accuracy but looks like multimillion views on some recent videos so seems possible.

Traffic from the past few days also isn't likely representative of the average.


Yeah, the argument that Kimmel has low ratings is a bit flawed because all these types of shows have low ratings in the traditional sense.

However, Kimmel has more YouTube subs than Joe Rogan. I saw someone say that on social media and didn't believe it so I went and looked it up myself.

That's prob a big driver in why he's back. He's still pretty "popular".


Kimmel has/had worse ratings than Colbert and Colbert was losing $40M per year. Assuming Kimmel's cost inputs for production are roughly similar to Colbert's, I would be shocked if his contract is renewed in May 2026. Kimmel's ratings are going to be totally irrelevant if he's losing money especially in light of Iger's public comments about improving profitability.

That's also assuming Colbert operating at a $40M annual loss is accurate. I feel like with all of these programs being available on streaming apps and youtube, its possible to make any show look like its reporting profits or losses depending on what message you're trying to sell.

Per the studio, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, which made something like a billion dollars worldwide, was not profitable.

So yeah.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Macarthur said:

fig96 said:

Sea Speed said:

I've read in a couple places that family feud last week got more viewers than Kimmel was getting. Haven't seen the actual numbers, but did see Brian stelter try and spin it, so that tells me it's probably true.

I saw something yesterday that mentioned a ton of his reach came via people watching clips on YouTube, where he does have over 20 million followers. No idea as to the accuracy but looks like multimillion views on some recent videos so seems possible.

Traffic from the past few days also isn't likely representative of the average.


Yeah, the argument that Kimmel has low ratings is a bit flawed because all these types of shows have low ratings in the traditional sense.

However, Kimmel has more YouTube subs than Joe Rogan. I saw someone say that on social media and didn't believe it so I went and looked it up myself.

That's prob a big driver in why he's back. He's still pretty "popular".

I don't know that anyone has done it, but I'd be really curious to see an analysis of ratings in the traditional sense vs actual reach and exposure when you account for YouTube, TikTok, streaming services, and all the other ways we can consume media now that we couldn't 10 years ago.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Industry analysts, insiders, and CBS itself all said it lost money. Surely, we aren't going to dispute that now are we?
EclipseAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Industry analysts, insiders, and CBS itself all said it lost money. Surely, we aren't going to dispute that now are we?

If you go to Kimmel's YouTube channel and watch clips, there aren't any ads ... at least, there weren't in the four or five I pulled up.

So he may get lots of eyeballs, but that is meaningless unless there is an advertiser paying for them.
AGC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Industry analysts, insiders, and CBS itself all said it lost money. Surely, we aren't going to dispute that now are we?


'Colbert was secretly making money' is the new argument? YouTube subs pay enough to cover kimmel's cost to abc to keep him on the air, despite the accounting? Occam's razor: don't call it a comeback.
Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sure, I think we may be talking past each other. I have concerns that model will last, at all, in 5 years. It' s not a Kimmel issue...It's a late night TV is dying issue.

My point was that he has a big following on youtube and the vast majority of the folks that consume his product do so on tik tok or youtube. Fallon is the same way.
cajunaggie08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EclipseAg said:

YouBet said:

Industry analysts, insiders, and CBS itself all said it lost money. Surely, we aren't going to dispute that now are we?

If you go to Kimmel's YouTube channel and watch clips, there aren't any ads ... at least, there weren't in the four or five I pulled up.

So he may get lots of eyeballs, but that is meaningless unless there is an advertiser paying for them.

That's probably because of ad blockers on your browser. I don't know what rate youtube pays to the channel owner for clips when they are legacy media
cajunaggie08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Industry analysts, insiders, and CBS itself all said it lost money. Surely, we aren't going to dispute that now are we?

Its very believable that the show is losing money. But the analysts and insiders are all reporting on the same number that CBS/Paramount is showcasing. If Colbert as a production on its own is losing THAT much money, then almost all of TV outside of sports must be losing money. Which could very well be true and part of why Fox is almost nothing but game shows, reality shows, and animated series when they arent showing sports
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

IMO, this is a fair/accurate read. Granted, I obviously support certain digs of his more than you, but overall he absolutely showed humility, grace, and genuine emotion. I thought the end was especially powerful when he talked about Erika/forgiveness/Jesus, and seemed to do with sincerity.

I also think you touched on the biggest takeaway, which is that "he is obviously not a ghoul and does indeed have humanity." I know the left goes WAY overboard in their rhetoric, excuses a ton of **** on their own side, weaponizes empathy to an insane degree, etc, but most of those on the left whom I know, at least, are good, decent people who ultimately want the same things we all want. That's why I can't stand blanket remarks like "the left is evil" or "the left killed Charlie Kirk." Are there evil people on the left? Yes, 100%. But most of them have humanity, treat people with kindness, have a soul, etc, they just have different (or sometimes flat out wrong) views of how to achieve the things we all want. Which is how I've always viewed Kimmel (that, and I actually do find him the funniest of the current, nightly late night hosts, which is blasphemy to some, I know).

Anyway, I just wanted to acknowledge the olive branch (even though I sit somewhere in the middle between the right and left) in the spirit of trying to find some common ground here.

I personally think he is consumed with an unhealthy amount of raw, irrational hatred...like so many brainwashed ppl on the left. The fact that he is super emo and cries when he F's up or when a lion dies across the world, does not make him a good person.

Jimmy Kimmel cheerfully fantasized about hospitals denying critical care to the unvaccinated and letting them die horrific painful deaths, and this was obviously met with raucous applause from his left winged studio audience.

To do that openly, and proudly, in public, in front of millions...yeah, he's a POS. HE ABSOLUTELY SHOULD HAVE BEEN FIRED BACK WHEN HE WAS WISHING DEATH UPON THE UNVAXXED.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Logos Stick said:

schmendeler said:

Aust Ag said:

schmendeler said:



They can mock all they want and have been doing it for years, so spare me.

Like I said above, how was this a sustainable business model in this new age of content accessibility when you put yourself behind the 8 ball by angering half the country. On what should be a comedy-centric program.

What about "bringing people together"? Not as important as piling on?


Except Trump has been openly talking about going after his enemies in the media for months if not years. Now he's getting what he wants. And you're willfully blind about what's happening.


The left has done more than talk, they've shot, killed and maimed many on the right. Transtifa is real. They've blown up and destroyed EVs, burned down cities, killed cops, etc...

Be proud, lefty.

Left winged terrorism is like a weekly occurence lately, at least. One lefty just tried to shoot up a bunch of ICE officers and accidentally killed two illegals instead. Just a few years ago, Kamala Harris was literally comparing ICE and BP to THE KU KLUX KLAN.

They are constantly demonizing their political opposition using very dangerous rhetoric, KNOWING that it is whipping up so many deranged democrat loons into a frenzy.

But hey, I've been told...

fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
El Gallo Blanco said:

TCTTS said:

IMO, this is a fair/accurate read. Granted, I obviously support certain digs of his more than you, but overall he absolutely showed humility, grace, and genuine emotion. I thought the end was especially powerful when he talked about Erika/forgiveness/Jesus, and seemed to do with sincerity.

I also think you touched on the biggest takeaway, which is that "he is obviously not a ghoul and does indeed have humanity." I know the left goes WAY overboard in their rhetoric, excuses a ton of **** on their own side, weaponizes empathy to an insane degree, etc, but most of those on the left whom I know, at least, are good, decent people who ultimately want the same things we all want. That's why I can't stand blanket remarks like "the left is evil" or "the left killed Charlie Kirk." Are there evil people on the left? Yes, 100%. But most of them have humanity, treat people with kindness, have a soul, etc, they just have different (or sometimes flat out wrong) views of how to achieve the things we all want. Which is how I've always viewed Kimmel (that, and I actually do find him the funniest of the current, nightly late night hosts, which is blasphemy to some, I know).

Anyway, I just wanted to acknowledge the olive branch (even though I sit somewhere in the middle between the right and left) in the spirit of trying to find some common ground here.

I personally think he is consumed with an unhealthy amount of raw but irrational hatred...like so many brainwashed ppl on the left. The fact that he is super emo and cries when he F's up or when a lion dies across the world, does not make him a good person.

Jimmy Kimmel cheerfully fantasized about hospitals denying critical care to the unvaccinated and letting them die horrific painful deaths, and this was obviously met with raucous applause from his left winged studio audience.

To do that openly, and proudly, in public, in front of millions...yeah, he's a POS. HE ABSOLUTELY SHOULD HAVE BEEN FIRED BACK WHEN HE WAS WISHING DEATH UPON THE UNVAXXED.
Hi pot this is kettle.
EclipseAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cajunaggie08 said:

EclipseAg said:

YouBet said:

Industry analysts, insiders, and CBS itself all said it lost money. Surely, we aren't going to dispute that now are we?

If you go to Kimmel's YouTube channel and watch clips, there aren't any ads ... at least, there weren't in the four or five I pulled up.

So he may get lots of eyeballs, but that is meaningless unless there is an advertiser paying for them.

That's probably because of ad blockers on your browser. I don't know what rate youtube pays to the channel owner for clips when they are legacy media

Could be. But I don't have an ad blocker that I know of and I typically see tons of ads on Youtube.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fig96 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

TCTTS said:

IMO, this is a fair/accurate read. Granted, I obviously support certain digs of his more than you, but overall he absolutely showed humility, grace, and genuine emotion. I thought the end was especially powerful when he talked about Erika/forgiveness/Jesus, and seemed to do with sincerity.

I also think you touched on the biggest takeaway, which is that "he is obviously not a ghoul and does indeed have humanity." I know the left goes WAY overboard in their rhetoric, excuses a ton of **** on their own side, weaponizes empathy to an insane degree, etc, but most of those on the left whom I know, at least, are good, decent people who ultimately want the same things we all want. That's why I can't stand blanket remarks like "the left is evil" or "the left killed Charlie Kirk." Are there evil people on the left? Yes, 100%. But most of them have humanity, treat people with kindness, have a soul, etc, they just have different (or sometimes flat out wrong) views of how to achieve the things we all want. Which is how I've always viewed Kimmel (that, and I actually do find him the funniest of the current, nightly late night hosts, which is blasphemy to some, I know).

Anyway, I just wanted to acknowledge the olive branch (even though I sit somewhere in the middle between the right and left) in the spirit of trying to find some common ground here.

I personally think he is consumed with an unhealthy amount of raw but irrational hatred...like so many brainwashed ppl on the left. The fact that he is super emo and cries when he F's up or when a lion dies across the world, does not make him a good person.

Jimmy Kimmel cheerfully fantasized about hospitals denying critical care to the unvaccinated and letting them die horrific painful deaths, and this was obviously met with raucous applause from his left winged studio audience.

To do that openly, and proudly, in public, in front of millions...yeah, he's a POS. HE ABSOLUTELY SHOULD HAVE BEEN FIRED BACK WHEN HE WAS WISHING DEATH UPON THE UNVAXXED.

Hi pot this is kettle.

Yeah yeah, I say things you don't like on an online internet forum. This guy was on national TV openly advocating for innocent people being refused medical attention, left to die, because they didn't want to take an experimantal vaccine.

He's a crap human being...no matter how much TCTTS tries to build him up.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

TCTTS said:

IMO, this is a fair/accurate read. Granted, I obviously support certain digs of his more than you, but overall he absolutely showed humility, grace, and genuine emotion. I thought the end was especially powerful when he talked about Erika/forgiveness/Jesus, and seemed to do with sincerity.

I also think you touched on the biggest takeaway, which is that "he is obviously not a ghoul and does indeed have humanity." I know the left goes WAY overboard in their rhetoric, excuses a ton of **** on their own side, weaponizes empathy to an insane degree, etc, but most of those on the left whom I know, at least, are good, decent people who ultimately want the same things we all want. That's why I can't stand blanket remarks like "the left is evil" or "the left killed Charlie Kirk." Are there evil people on the left? Yes, 100%. But most of them have humanity, treat people with kindness, have a soul, etc, they just have different (or sometimes flat out wrong) views of how to achieve the things we all want. Which is how I've always viewed Kimmel (that, and I actually do find him the funniest of the current, nightly late night hosts, which is blasphemy to some, I know).

Anyway, I just wanted to acknowledge the olive branch (even though I sit somewhere in the middle between the right and left) in the spirit of trying to find some common ground here.

I personally think he is consumed with an unhealthy amount of raw but irrational hatred...like so many brainwashed ppl on the left. The fact that he is super emo and cries when he F's up or when a lion dies across the world, does not make him a good person.

Jimmy Kimmel cheerfully fantasized about hospitals denying critical care to the unvaccinated and letting them die horrific painful deaths, and this was obviously met with raucous applause from his left winged studio audience.

To do that openly, and proudly, in public, in front of millions...yeah, he's a POS. HE ABSOLUTELY SHOULD HAVE BEEN FIRED BACK WHEN HE WAS WISHING DEATH UPON THE UNVAXXED.

Hi pot this is kettle.


Literally all he does is talk about how much he hates the left. He can't craft a single post, no matter the "entertainment" subject, without it being political, and thus full of hate for the left. And then he says things like you just bolded above and it's astonishing, the lack of self-awareness.

Never mind that he completely ignores the vast amount of hate the right spews in general. Yes, many on the left are consumed with irrational, over-the-top hate of Trump, MAGA, etc. He's not wrong in that regard. But his inability to look in the mirror, and to not smell the stink of his side's **** will never not be baffling to me. For every cry of "fasicist!" and "Hitler!" from the left, the worst of the right are never not literally demonizing the left to utterly insane degrees, calling them pure evil, saying they must be "defeated" in ways that sound less political and more like cultural eradication, etc. Especially in the wake of Kirk's death, they'll complain about how being called "fascists" and "Hitler" is what lead to Kirk's killer being radicalized, and that very well may be true. But then in the very next breath they'll basically infer that the left is subhuman scum that our country needs to cleansed of, using the exact same hateful, over-the-top rhetoric they were just finger waving about.

Anyway, every single time El Gallo Blanco posts, that's what I'm reminded of, and I'm just so sick of the double standard.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
El Gallo Blanco said:

fig96 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

TCTTS said:

IMO, this is a fair/accurate read. Granted, I obviously support certain digs of his more than you, but overall he absolutely showed humility, grace, and genuine emotion. I thought the end was especially powerful when he talked about Erika/forgiveness/Jesus, and seemed to do with sincerity.

I also think you touched on the biggest takeaway, which is that "he is obviously not a ghoul and does indeed have humanity." I know the left goes WAY overboard in their rhetoric, excuses a ton of **** on their own side, weaponizes empathy to an insane degree, etc, but most of those on the left whom I know, at least, are good, decent people who ultimately want the same things we all want. That's why I can't stand blanket remarks like "the left is evil" or "the left killed Charlie Kirk." Are there evil people on the left? Yes, 100%. But most of them have humanity, treat people with kindness, have a soul, etc, they just have different (or sometimes flat out wrong) views of how to achieve the things we all want. Which is how I've always viewed Kimmel (that, and I actually do find him the funniest of the current, nightly late night hosts, which is blasphemy to some, I know).

Anyway, I just wanted to acknowledge the olive branch (even though I sit somewhere in the middle between the right and left) in the spirit of trying to find some common ground here.

I personally think he is consumed with an unhealthy amount of raw but irrational hatred...like so many brainwashed ppl on the left. The fact that he is super emo and cries when he F's up or when a lion dies across the world, does not make him a good person.

Jimmy Kimmel cheerfully fantasized about hospitals denying critical care to the unvaccinated and letting them die horrific painful deaths, and this was obviously met with raucous applause from his left winged studio audience.

To do that openly, and proudly, in public, in front of millions...yeah, he's a POS. HE ABSOLUTELY SHOULD HAVE BEEN FIRED BACK WHEN HE WAS WISHING DEATH UPON THE UNVAXXED.

Hi pot this is kettle.

Yeah yeah, I say things you don't like on an online internet forum. This guy was on national TV openly advocating for innocent people being refused medical attention, left to die, because they didn't want to take an experimantal vaccine.

He's a crap human being...no matter how much TCTTS tries to build him up.


I've had ONE semi-positive post about Kimmel in this thread, and that was mainly in attempt to meet someone from "the other side" in the middle. That's it. Otherwise, I've been critical of him in this thread numerous times. If you would take off your ridiculous, partisan-colored glasses, you would be able to see that.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
austinAG90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie_Journalist said:

I can't keep up with whether MAGA is pro or anti cancel culture. It almost seems to depend on the politics of whoever is being cancelled.

I don't know if Disney thought it was a mis-carriage of justice taking him off air or if they should just go ahead and abort the whole show at this point.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

fig96 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

TCTTS said:

IMO, this is a fair/accurate read. Granted, I obviously support certain digs of his more than you, but overall he absolutely showed humility, grace, and genuine emotion. I thought the end was especially powerful when he talked about Erika/forgiveness/Jesus, and seemed to do with sincerity.

I also think you touched on the biggest takeaway, which is that "he is obviously not a ghoul and does indeed have humanity." I know the left goes WAY overboard in their rhetoric, excuses a ton of **** on their own side, weaponizes empathy to an insane degree, etc, but most of those on the left whom I know, at least, are good, decent people who ultimately want the same things we all want. That's why I can't stand blanket remarks like "the left is evil" or "the left killed Charlie Kirk." Are there evil people on the left? Yes, 100%. But most of them have humanity, treat people with kindness, have a soul, etc, they just have different (or sometimes flat out wrong) views of how to achieve the things we all want. Which is how I've always viewed Kimmel (that, and I actually do find him the funniest of the current, nightly late night hosts, which is blasphemy to some, I know).

Anyway, I just wanted to acknowledge the olive branch (even though I sit somewhere in the middle between the right and left) in the spirit of trying to find some common ground here.

I personally think he is consumed with an unhealthy amount of raw but irrational hatred...like so many brainwashed ppl on the left. The fact that he is super emo and cries when he F's up or when a lion dies across the world, does not make him a good person.

Jimmy Kimmel cheerfully fantasized about hospitals denying critical care to the unvaccinated and letting them die horrific painful deaths, and this was obviously met with raucous applause from his left winged studio audience.

To do that openly, and proudly, in public, in front of millions...yeah, he's a POS. HE ABSOLUTELY SHOULD HAVE BEEN FIRED BACK WHEN HE WAS WISHING DEATH UPON THE UNVAXXED.

Hi pot this is kettle.

Yeah yeah, I say things you don't like on an online internet forum. This guy was on national TV openly advocating for innocent people being refused medical attention, left to die, because they didn't want to take an experimantal vaccine.

He's a crap human being...no matter how much TCTTS tries to build him up.


I've had ONE semi-positive post about Kimmel in this thread, and that was mainly in attempt to meet someone from "the other side" in the middle. That's it. Otherwise, I've been critical of him in this thread numerous times. If you would take off your ridiculous, partisan-colored glasses, you would be able to see that.


And I am allowed to bring up his hatred and disgusting sentiments towards the unvaccinated in response to your "humanity" comment. He shows SOME humanity here because he was called out for his ridiculous remarks…and I'm sure there was some heavy pressure behind the scenes. But he's so consumed with irrational hatred for Trump and his supporters that he blamed them for the death of Charlie Kirk. Between that and the occasional spontaneous crying, this guys is simply not well.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

fig96 said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

TCTTS said:

IMO, this is a fair/accurate read. Granted, I obviously support certain digs of his more than you, but overall he absolutely showed humility, grace, and genuine emotion. I thought the end was especially powerful when he talked about Erika/forgiveness/Jesus, and seemed to do with sincerity.

I also think you touched on the biggest takeaway, which is that "he is obviously not a ghoul and does indeed have humanity." I know the left goes WAY overboard in their rhetoric, excuses a ton of **** on their own side, weaponizes empathy to an insane degree, etc, but most of those on the left whom I know, at least, are good, decent people who ultimately want the same things we all want. That's why I can't stand blanket remarks like "the left is evil" or "the left killed Charlie Kirk." Are there evil people on the left? Yes, 100%. But most of them have humanity, treat people with kindness, have a soul, etc, they just have different (or sometimes flat out wrong) views of how to achieve the things we all want. Which is how I've always viewed Kimmel (that, and I actually do find him the funniest of the current, nightly late night hosts, which is blasphemy to some, I know).

Anyway, I just wanted to acknowledge the olive branch (even though I sit somewhere in the middle between the right and left) in the spirit of trying to find some common ground here.

I personally think he is consumed with an unhealthy amount of raw but irrational hatred...like so many brainwashed ppl on the left. The fact that he is super emo and cries when he F's up or when a lion dies across the world, does not make him a good person.

Jimmy Kimmel cheerfully fantasized about hospitals denying critical care to the unvaccinated and letting them die horrific painful deaths, and this was obviously met with raucous applause from his left winged studio audience.

To do that openly, and proudly, in public, in front of millions...yeah, he's a POS. HE ABSOLUTELY SHOULD HAVE BEEN FIRED BACK WHEN HE WAS WISHING DEATH UPON THE UNVAXXED.

Hi pot this is kettle.


Literally all he does is talk about how much he hates the left. He can't craft a single post, no matter the "entertainment" subject, without it being political, and thus full of hate for the left. And then he says things like you just bolded above and it's astonishing, the lack of self-awareness.

Never mind that he completely ignores the vast amount of hate the right spews in general. Yes, many on the left are consumed with irrational, over-the-top hate of Trump, MAGA, etc. He's not wrong in that regard. But his inability to look in the mirror, and to not smell the stink of his side's **** will never not be baffling to me. For every cry of "fasicist!" and "Hitler!" from the left, the worst of the right are never not literally demonizing the left to utterly insane degrees, calling them pure evil, saying they must be "defeated" in ways that sound less political and more like cultural eradication, etc. Especially in the wake of Kirk's death, they'll complain about how being called "fascists" and "Hitler" is what lead to Kirk's killer being radicalized, and that very well may be true. But then in the very next breath they'll basically infer that the left is subhuman scum that our country needs to cleansed of, using the exact same hateful, over-the-top rhetoric they were just finger waving about.

Anyway, every single time El Gallo Blanco posts, that's what I'm reminded of, and I'm just so sick of the double standard.

No, you just miss my non-political posts on here. But yeah, when the entire premise of the thread is politically charged in nature, you may have to hear some opposing political viewpoints. I realize that is not something most Hollywoodians are used to.

No one is calling for genocide of the left. Heated political discourse is not violence. The violence is almost exclusively coming from ONE SIDE. I can post compilations mintes long of crazy liberal politicians, celebs, influencers etc literally calling for violence and using insanely dangerous and hateful rhetoric. You can not find anything even remotely the same from the right. You just can't.

And it does not make one a hypocrite to say certain things on an anonymour message board that they would not say in person. You're prime example of this...one of the most emotionally erratic and hysterical posters on here. For instance, I wouldn't discuss with my colleagues about how bad progressivism is for our country and my offspring's future, even though i truly believe it to be the case. It would be one thing if Jimmy Kimmel had jokingly wished death on a large % of the population via text, among friends, or on an online forum...but to so so proudly and publicly on national TV? Almost everyone else would get fired for much less. I honestly cannot believe he still had a job after that "let the unvaccinated die" bit that he did.

What a stupid business model...to just constantly demonize and p*ss off half of the country. Goodness the guy is such a digraceful clown.
cajunaggie08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:



either that or they saw the mouse's legal team
jokershady
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I jumped around because I had read a comment about something he said and was trying to find it…cause if true I was thinking to myself, "maybe that'll be one thing where I can go, 'Yes! Thank you for saying that!'"

And I found it….

Towards the end of his opening monologue he discussed how moving it was of Erika to forgive the shooter and said the name of Jesus….he said he followed Jesus's teaching which I am going to question….BUT….he said the name….and he said it in a positive way….and he said if you take anything away from tonight have it be that (Erika forgiving) and not this (his monologue)….

So for that….i give you a thumbs up sir
swimmerbabe11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
swimmerbabe11 said:

AGC said:

swimmerbabe11 said:

Quad Dog said:

Curious if Kimmel made some sort of promise for an on-air concession or if Disney decided to fight the man?



more likely someone donated something to someone and money changed hands somewhere and we'll never know but the corrupt wheel of government turns for another day.


Option B / Occam's Razor: the FCC didn't get Kimmel fired in the first place.


Funny, IMO the simplest solution is always to assume that the powers that be, be corrupt.




option c, this was all a big coordinated ploy for a temporary boost in Kimmel ratings, a "win" for each team, and a big big distraction from the censorship bill that just passed in California (AB715) because at the end of the day they all just want more power
fat girlfriend
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If he would say, "I'm sorry I lied about the Kirk shooter being a MAGA guy," that would suffice.

Why won't he say that?
Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fat girlfriend said:

If he would say, "I'm sorry I lied about the Kirk shooter being a MAGA guy," that would suffice.

Why won't he say that?

But he didn't say that. Why should he a say he's sorry for something he didn't say?
fat girlfriend
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Macarthur said:

fat girlfriend said:

If he would say, "I'm sorry I lied about the Kirk shooter being a MAGA guy," that would suffice.

Why won't he say that?

But he didn't say that. Why should he a say he's sorry for something he didn't say?



There is no other reasonable way to understand his comments. If you can't admit that, I can't take you seriously.
Macarthur
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fat girlfriend said:

Macarthur said:

fat girlfriend said:

If he would say, "I'm sorry I lied about the Kirk shooter being a MAGA guy," that would suffice.

Why won't he say that?

But he didn't say that. Why should he a say he's sorry for something he didn't say?



There is no other reasonable way to understand his comments. If you can't admit that, I can't take you seriously.

You're reading what you want into his comments. That is 100% NOT what he actually said.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.