Trump Shutting Down USAID

253,044 Views | 1843 Replies | Last: 6 days ago by nortex97
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trip back in time to the 1991 Haitian coup d'etat (And successor), and the origins of the Clinton criminal organization in conjunction with USAID.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Will see if the House comes thru;

Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stat Monitor Repairman said:




Pro College Station Convention Center
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wow.

Quote:

Condoleezza Rice thought that the State Department needed reform, that USAID had mission creep, and that the concept of aid needed to be revisited since countries were not improving after decades of giving them our tax dollars.

USAID went from a righteous mission of trying to help countries in need to using it to spread globalist progressive ideology around the world including the trans agenda, DEI, and the SDGs which is a NWO based on the climate con.

They also decided to use USAID as a slush account to fund civil society which includes democracy cult nonprofits and NGOs that make up the shadow government.

Since democrats are already talking about how to rebuild USAID when they take back power, congressional republicans should pass a law that specifically addresses what aid can and cannot be used for (ie food assistance yes, ideology and leftist nonprofits no).

Full text above. Condoleeza was/is a full-on neocon. Amazing she'd even say this in public.
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Our country is ****ed and any hope we had of rooting out the evil that controls the masses is gone. Our "leaders" have sold their souls to satan and traded all of us for the promise of riches on earth and power in hell. **** them, lets just get this **** over with and meet for the final battle.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hey now, I don't think it's 'over' yet, it just got damn close. The depth of depravity our government has funded/facilitated with evil ****s like Soros' army of NGO's spans the globe, via tentacles from USAID etc, but it can still be cut. It has now been substantively weakened, but more is needed.


And yeah, when I read that we paid $90 million to the Taliban for supposedly (but not really) killing a guy this month, it makes me shake my head, but the point is that we now have a spotlight on the insanity when it pops up, and when we discuss it there's no rush to 'that's just a conspiracy' inanity. That's at least…a start. And many more changes are happening presently at the State Department, which will also increase accountability/scrutiny.

Ultimately, it's a battle against Marxism, which is the state taking actions against the people 'for their own good.' Long thread by Mike Lee, I will only post toward the end (11 tweets):

Americans will win.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Benz references this documentary. I am not sure if it is out yet or not, and despite subtitles, seems to be (entirely) in english.

Sanctions now are imposed on tyrant De Moraes (the faux judge running Brazil's censorship complex):
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dem funding drying up. LOLOLOL


Quote:

Teddy Schleifer @teddyschleifer

Cash on hand as of June 30:
Republican National Committee: $80.8 million
Democratic National Committee: $15.2 million


nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hunter Biden, USGLC, Samantha Power, Liz Shrayer, and the $95 billion question of graft (in just one bill last year).




Thread reader of longer thread dealing with USGLC, Gates Foundation, Open Society etc. The youtube video of their last meeting should absolutely be made public. The goal, notably, of Samantha Power was to get to 50% of funding being run thru NGO's by 2030:
Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

Hunter Biden, USGLC, Samantha Power, Liz Shrayer, and the $95 billion question of graft (in just one bill last year).




Thread reader of longer thread dealing with USGLC, Gates Foundation, Open Society etc. The youtube video of their last meeting should absolutely be made public. The goal, notably, of Samantha Power was to get to 50% of funding being run thru NGO's by 2030:


How does anyone fix this ***** Giving money to USAID, that couldn't be looked into, so they could give billions to another NGO, that can't be looked into. Hitler would be proud.

And they let Elon go, and ignored what he did.

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
LOL OLD
Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I mean Elon was never going to stay forever. The work has to continue with other people willing to put the time and energy into it. The good news is we don't have to match the time, money, and effort it took to build their colossal empire. We just have to follow the breadcrumbs and record it.
Science Denier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Decay said:

I mean Elon was never going to stay forever. The work has to continue with other people willing to put the time and energy into it. The good news is we don't have to match the time, money, and effort it took to build their colossal empire. We just have to follow the breadcrumbs and record it.

Thought he was going to stay for a few years. Sure, it needs to be sustainable, but to get it going to start with needs someone like Musk running it for longer than a few months.
LOL OLD
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

LOL, that's true.
Rocky Rider
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The biggest crooks in the world live among us and yet most of the country think we are so civilized. What a joke
JFABNRGR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rocky Rider said:

The biggest crooks in the world live among us and yet most of the country think we are so civilized. What a joke


Exactly….yet many still cry corruption in Ukraine, and get to do so without having to be in a bomb shelter.
“You can resolve to live your life with integrity. Let your credo be this: Let the lie come into the world, let it even triumph. But not through me.”
- Alexander Solzhenitsyn
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rocky Rider said:

The biggest crooks in the world live among us and yet most of the country think we are so civilized. What a joke

Thats the story of humanity since the dawn of time, not sure why you are suprised.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JFABNRGR said:

Rocky Rider said:

The biggest crooks in the world live among us and yet most of the country think we are so civilized. What a joke


Exactly….yet many still cry corruption in Ukraine, and get to do so without having to be in a bomb shelter.

Ukraine is corrupt, but feel free to ignore it.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Huge news in the USAID adjacent USIP, which had tried to lock the doors so DOGE/POTUS staff couldn't even enter the building, as a reminder.

Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
See, they're still out there crushing cockroaches.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Decay said:

See, they're still out there crushing cockroaches.

You know what they say about cockroaches. For every one you see there's a hundred you don't.
Pro College Station Convention Center
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShaggySLC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:



It's vomiting what the government has given these rejects of society. That's American money they just piss away like its nothing.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Newsguard operation really took the cake, for me. And the founder called for a constitutional amendment providing for open borders.

The scale of the fake news/censorship via USAID was/is just astounding. A half billion to this shack for 'Internews?'

Datarepublican has more receipts, but that thread is just mind blowing to revisit, too.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.