2025-26 Roster Thread

113,752 Views | 537 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by JJxvi
OldFox61
How long do you want to ignore this user?
List of players should show Dominguez with 4 years of eligibility
DukeMu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OldFox61 said:

List of players should show Dominguez with 4 years of eligibility
Wow - he's 22 now I believe. We're the new UConn. They won NCs with players nearly qualifying for AARP.
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is there a question about Agee's eligibility or health?

bobinator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My guess is he had to officially apply to get a medical redshirt for the 2021 season when he was at New Mexico State but he should get it, he only played one game.

We've talked about some of the wild eligibility stuff with this roster but Agee might be the wildest of all. He was originally part of the 2019 high school class.

For reference that was Buzz's first class here that included Emmanuel Miller, Andre Gordon, etc.

19-20: Redshirted at NMSU
20-21: Played one game at NMSU (this is the year he should get back, but you have to exhaust your eligibility before you apply)
21-22: Played JuCo (doesn't count anymore)
22-23: Bowling Green
23-24: Bowling Green
24-25: USC
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks for the information. Would be crazy if he didn't get approved with the current climate
bobinator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's also dumb as hell that the redshirting rules are different between sports.
taylorswift13_
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Andre Gordon my glorious King <3
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Our staff expects him to be eligible but with the NCAA you never know.
JJxvi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Saying juco doesnt count anymore is not strictly true. Its been ruled that it shouldn't start the eligibility clock, but for a player like Agee who went back to Juco, his clock had already started, and its never been ruled that going back to juco pauses your eligibility. That would continue us down the slippery slope and imply generally that eligibility is paused when you quit playing NCAA and you can resume your career later.
bobinator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
True, I hadn't considered the "clock" aspect of it which could make this case potentially different from other recent rulings.
Aston04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JJxvi said:

Saying juco doesnt count anymore is not strictly true. Its been ruled that it shouldn't start the eligibility clock, but for a player like Agee who went back to Juco, his clock had already started, and its never been ruled that going back to juco pauses your eligibility. That would continue us down the slippery slope and imply generally that eligibility is paused when you quit playing NCAA and you can resume your career later.
The "clock" thing is dumb anyway. You should just have X amount of years (whatever they decide) of college eligibility - that are only used when you play. If you attend college and then go on a mission for a year- you shouldn't be penalized for that year. Same with juco... in my opinion.. kids should not be penalized for playing juco ball out of a certain sequence... attending juco should be encouraged..

Only exception where the clock makes sense to me is if the kid originally left college to play pro in that sport.
vander54
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Nm
World's worst proofreader
JJxvi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aston04 said:

JJxvi said:

Saying juco doesnt count anymore is not strictly true. Its been ruled that it shouldn't start the eligibility clock, but for a player like Agee who went back to Juco, his clock had already started, and its never been ruled that going back to juco pauses your eligibility. That would continue us down the slippery slope and imply generally that eligibility is paused when you quit playing NCAA and you can resume your career later.
The "clock" thing is dumb anyway. You should just have X amount of years (whatever they decide) of college eligibility - that are only used when you play. If you attend college and then go on a mission for a year- you shouldn't be penalized for that year. Same with juco... in my opinion.. kids should not be penalized for playing juco ball out of a certain sequence... attending juco should be encouraged..

Only exception where the clock makes sense to me is if the kid originally left college to play pro in that sport.


I think that college sports with professionalization should probably adopt simpler eligibility rules and go with an age cap. 24-under league or something like that
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.