DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list

181,940 Views | 2538 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by OPAG
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag13 • 1:44p, 7/25/25
Under no circumstance, should a pardon ever be on the table.

If she were to provide evidence that would convict multiple people, then you can talk about commuting her sentence at some point.


Despite the new attempts by some out there to paint her as a victim, make a mistake she has a monster.

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
f1ghtintexasaggie
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 1:47p, 7/25/25
Im Gipper said:
Under no circumstance, should a pardon ever be on the table.

If she were to provide evidence that would convict multiple people, then you can talk about commuting her sentence at some point.


Despite the new attempts by some out there to paint her as a victim, make no mistake she is a monster.


FIFY & 100%
Reply Quote
Ag13
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 1:47p, 7/25/25
Im Gipper said:
Under no circumstance, should a pardon ever be on the table.

If she were to provide evidence that would convict multiple people, then you can talk about commuting her sentence at some point.


Despite the new attempts by some out there to paint her as a victim, make a mistake she has a monster.

Ya that's where I'm at I think - she's still an absolute devil. I don't blame her for asking for a pardon but I just can't really fathom a circumstance where Trump would actually consider it. Talk about a political loser.
Reply Quote
1 edit
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to f1ghtintexasaggie • 1:49p, 7/25/25
Good catch!! lol

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
Francis Macomber
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to rgvag11 • 2:05p, 7/25/25
rgvag11 said:
flown-the-coop said:
rgvag11 said:

Focus on your reading comprehension.

Again, we are talking about the Epstein Birthday Book. Please stay on topic and don't get distracted.

Why do you think information about Epstein Birthday Book is "false, misleading and irrelevant"?

What relevance is a birthday card book put together in 2003, two years before the first allegations against Epstein emerged?


Well, those allegations accused Jeffery Epstein of sex trafficking and abusing underage girls in his homes in Manhattan, New York, and Palm Beach, Florida between 2002 and 2005.

Do you really not see the relevance, or are you being deliberately obtuse?

dude is straight out of a 1984 novel.
Reply Quote
Francis Macomber
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:10p, 7/25/25
100% they're going to work out a deal to pardon her based on her giving up some names but leaving out others.

Trump sycophants will come up with some way to rationalize it, though.
Reply Quote
aggiegolfer2012
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 2:12p, 7/25/25
Im Gipper said:
Under no circumstance, should a pardon ever be on the table.

If she were to provide evidence that would convict multiple people, then you can talk about commuting her sentence at some point.


Despite the new attempts by some out there to paint her as a victim, make a mistake she has a monster.


Yep
And hard for me to believe she does anything beside this
Reply Quote
austinAG90
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Francis Macomber • 2:14p, 7/25/25
Francis Macomber said:
100% they're going to work out a deal to pardon her based on her giving up some names but leaving out others.

Trump sycophants will come up with some way to rationalize it, though.

She's not getting a pardon.
Reply Quote
aginlakeway
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Francis Macomber • 2:16p, 7/25/25
Francis Macomber said:
100% they're going to work out a deal to pardon her based on her giving up some names but leaving out others.

Trump sycophants will come up with some way to rationalize it, though.


I don't think anyone on TexAgs is a sycophant. There's little to be gained on a message board.

Do you think that Trump haters will find a way to keep this conspiracy going, no matter what is ever released?
Reply Quote
Francis Macomber
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to austinAG90 • 2:19p, 7/25/25
austinAG90 said:
Francis Macomber said:
100% they're going to work out a deal to pardon her based on her giving up some names but leaving out others.

Trump sycophants will come up with some way to rationalize it, though.

She's not getting a pardon.

We'll see. I hope you are right.
Reply Quote
1 edit
FWTXAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:25p, 7/25/25
The first 4 or 5 pages of this thread were the best. Now we're just wasting our time watching folks that are as bad at defense as the 2013 Texas Aggies were during Johnny's last year.
Reply Quote
aginlakeway
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FWTXAg • 2:28p, 7/25/25
FWTXAg said:
The first 4 or 5 pages of this thread were the best. Now we're just wasting our time watching folks that are as bad at defense as the 2013 Texas Aggies were during Johnny's last year.


100% agree. The Trump haters are scrambling to determine the next crisis that will end it all for Trump.
Reply Quote
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FWTXAg • 2:31p, 7/25/25
FWTXAg said:
The first 4 or 5 pages of this thread were the best. Now we're just wasting our time watching folks that are as bad at defense as the 2013 Texas Aggies were during Johnny's last year.

Well the poor dems have absolutely nothing on the bench to be proud of so they have to spend their energy rooting against the other team to try to make themselves feel better.
Reply Quote
rgvag11
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Francis Macomber • 2:38p, 7/25/25
Francis Macomber said:
rgvag11 said:
flown-the-coop said:
rgvag11 said:

Focus on your reading comprehension.

Again, we are talking about the Epstein Birthday Book. Please stay on topic and don't get distracted.

Why do you think information about Epstein Birthday Book is "false, misleading and irrelevant"?

What relevance is a birthday card book put together in 2003, two years before the first allegations against Epstein emerged?


Well, those allegations accused Jeffery Epstein of sex trafficking and abusing underage girls in his homes in Manhattan, New York, and Palm Beach, Florida between 2002 and 2005.

Do you really not see the relevance, or are you being deliberately obtuse?

dude is straight out of a 1984 novel.


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."
Reply Quote
rgvag11
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:39p, 7/25/25
Reply Quote
aginlakeway
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rockdoc • 2:40p, 7/25/25
Rockdoc said:
FWTXAg said:
The first 4 or 5 pages of this thread were the best. Now we're just wasting our time watching folks that are as bad at defense as the 2013 Texas Aggies were during Johnny's last year.

Well the poor dems have absolutely nothing on the bench to be proud of so they have to spend their energy rooting against the other team to try to make themselves feel better.


All they have had is anti-Trump b.s. for 10 years.
Reply Quote
Anonymous Source
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to rgvag11 • 2:52p, 7/25/25
rgvag11 said:

Man, I don't know anyone surrounded by so many liars, conspirators and people looking to take him down. He has GOT to be the most unlucky person on Earth.

I'll bet it was Joe Biden's autopen!!!!
Gig 'Em
Reply Quote
1 edit
EastTX_Aggie
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:00p, 7/25/25
Reply Quote
bobbranco
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to rgvag11 • 3:01p, 7/25/25
rgvag11 said:

So they only thing you said you think is "false, misleading and irrelevant" about the Epstein Birthday Book is that Trump is in it.

Is that correct?

So you don't care about Bill Clinton and other people's association with a known child trafficer?


Weird people care.

But normal people don't really care nor want to spend the next 3 1/2 years talking about Epstein and crapping all over Trump's agenda.

Reply Quote
Prosperdick
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to rgvag11 • 3:05p, 7/25/25
rgvag11 said:
Francis Macomber said:
rgvag11 said:
flown-the-coop said:
rgvag11 said:

Focus on your reading comprehension.

Again, we are talking about the Epstein Birthday Book. Please stay on topic and don't get distracted.

Why do you think information about Epstein Birthday Book is "false, misleading and irrelevant"?

What relevance is a birthday card book put together in 2003, two years before the first allegations against Epstein emerged?


Well, those allegations accused Jeffery Epstein of sex trafficking and abusing underage girls in his homes in Manhattan, New York, and Palm Beach, Florida between 2002 and 2005.

Do you really not see the relevance, or are you being deliberately obtuse?

dude is straight out of a 1984 novel.


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."

From someone who voted for the party that said Biden was "sharp as a tack" that's especially rich.
Reply Quote
El Gallo Blanco
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to rgvag11 • 3:07p, 7/25/25
rgvag11 said:
Francis Macomber said:
rgvag11 said:
flown-the-coop said:
rgvag11 said:

Focus on your reading comprehension.

Again, we are talking about the Epstein Birthday Book. Please stay on topic and don't get distracted.

Why do you think information about Epstein Birthday Book is "false, misleading and irrelevant"?

What relevance is a birthday card book put together in 2003, two years before the first allegations against Epstein emerged?


Well, those allegations accused Jeffery Epstein of sex trafficking and abusing underage girls in his homes in Manhattan, New York, and Palm Beach, Florida between 2002 and 2005.

Do you really not see the relevance, or are you being deliberately obtuse?

dude is straight out of a 1984 novel.


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You liberal male feminists don't get to say this.
Reply Quote
austinAG90
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:23p, 7/25/25
Personally, I think most of the Bday is fake, made up by Maxwell to further boast Epstein's warped sense of entitlement. Like his claims he worked for Mossad and doing Gov deals. Guy was SFOS and only other pedos truly hung out with him.
Reply Quote
flown-the-coop
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to austinAG90 • 3:33p, 7/25/25
Not an unreasonable take.
Reply Quote
Ag13
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to EastTX_Aggie • 3:41p, 7/25/25
EastTX_Aggie said:


It makes no sense to me that this information would not have been used (or even gathered??) before her trial.
Reply Quote
Keyno
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag13 • 3:45p, 7/25/25
Ag13 said:
EastTX_Aggie said:


It makes no sense to me that this information would not have been used (or even gathered??) before her trial.

Because there's a coverup that's been going on for years
Reply Quote
rgvag11
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to austinAG90 • 3:51p, 7/25/25
austinAG90 said:
Personally, I think most of the Bday is fake, made up by Maxwell to further boast Epstein's warped sense of entitlement. Like his claims he worked for Mossad and doing Gov deals. Guy was SFOS and only other pedos truly hung out with him.







Reply Quote
FobTies
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to austinAG90 • 3:58p, 7/25/25
austinAG90 said:
Like his claims he worked for Mossad and doing Gov deals. Guy was SFOS and only other pedos truly hung out with him.


You post this over and over despite all the evidence you choose to ignore.

Epstein was well known to launder money. Tons of suspicious activity reports with banks, and all kinds of other clues mentioned here ad nauseam. He set up the Clintons with their pay for play 501C scheme. His main utility was facilitating deals with his international connections and shell companies. Girls were a tool for him, like the yachts and jets. He had tons of compromising material, but that wasnt how he ammased his wealth.

You have to ignore a lot of facts to think he was like the used car sales guy on True Lies. The feds admited to Alex Acosta he belonged to intelligence. Our own gov hasnt even yet denied it, probably bc there are just too many that know from all the deals over the years.
Reply Quote
1 edit
f1ghtintexasaggie
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag13 • 3:59p, 7/25/25
Ag13 said:
EastTX_Aggie said:


It makes no sense to me that this information would not have been used (or even gathered??) before her trial.


Correct, exactly. It makes no sense. It also made no sense to give Epstein himself the sweetheart prison arrangement in 2008(?). Go look that up those details. So you have to ask yourself WHY these coincidences keep happening in this case? Wtf does the government (both Rs and Ds) not seem to have an interest in taking this case with any sort of seriousness?
Reply Quote
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to rgvag11 • 4:18p, 7/25/25
lol and you still don't have him!
Reply Quote
Charpie
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:23p, 7/25/25
I am seeing random tweets that Maxwell is getting limited immunity
Reply Quote
austinAG90
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FobTies • 4:26p, 7/25/25
FobTies said:
austinAG90 said:
Like his claims he worked for Mossad and doing Gov deals. Guy was SFOS and only other pedos truly hung out with him.


You post this over and over despite all the evidence you choose to ignore.

Epstein was well known to launder money. Tons of suspicious activity reports with banks, and all kinds of other clues mentioned here ad nauseam. He set up the Clintons with their pay for play 501C scheme. His main utility was facilitating deals with his international connections and shell companies. Girls were a tool for him, like the yachts and jets. He had tons of compromising material, but that wasnt how he ammased his wealth.

You have to ignore a lot of facts to think he was like the used car sales guy on True Lies. The feds admited to Alex Acosta he belonged to intelligence. Our own gov hasnt even yet denied it, probably bc there are just too many that know from all the deals over the years.

You keep posting this over and over. You believe what you want to and I'll stick with my beliefs. You give Epstein way to much credit, and True Lies is a great reference for him.
Reply Quote
Charpie
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:29p, 7/25/25
Reply Quote
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Charpie • 4:29p, 7/25/25
Charpie said:
I am seeing random tweets that Maxwell is getting limited immunity


Not uncommon. "Tell us what you know, we won't use this conversation against you".

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
aginlakeway
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Charpie • 4:47p, 7/25/25
Charpie said:


No doubt many will say that she's covering for Trump ...
Reply Quote
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:50p, 7/25/25
She can say anything she wants. She has to have proof for it to stick.
Reply Quote
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.