***** OFFICIAL PURGING OF THE DEEP STATE *****

325,197 Views | 2196 Replies | Last: 15 min ago by txags92
lobopride
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The American Federation of Government Employees is planning to lay off more than half its staff, as the largest federal employees' union reels from President Donald Trump's move to end collective bargaining rights for many federal workers.
AFGE, which has filed an array of lawsuits against the Trump administration, is set to shrink its own workforce to about 150 employees, down from 355 staffers, according to a union spokesperson. The layoffs, which will affect organizers, national representatives, support staff and others, could take place as early as June.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/26/politics/afge-government-employee-union-layoffs/index.html
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


-Many section chiefs have been transferred to roles unrelated to their legal backgrounds, including in the complaint adjudication office and the office that handles public records requests.

-"I was there almost 18 years, and what's happening now is basically the opposite of what we've been doing," whined one veteran lawyer who recently left the department.

-"They are withdrawing everything we've done and taking the opposite side on voting rights, for example," whined a recently departed Civil Division lawyer.

-Dhillon's memo outlines new priorities, including "Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism," "Restoring Merit Based Opportunity" and "Designating English as the Official Language of the United States."

-The "Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias" task force will be a focus. "The Biden administration engaged in an egregious pattern of targeting peaceful Christians while ignoring violent, anti-Christian offenses," Pam Bondi said at a meeting of the new task force.


This is fantastic. It's how you get people to quit voluntarily. There's more than one way to skin a cat.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Still waiting on Norm Eisen to face charges. Any charges.

The plan had been for them to go after/impeach 'right wing judges' by now if somehow Veepthroat had won.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yep, and the beast in the swamp has used the press to coordinate leak-driven attacks for many years, quite deliberately. Certainly not limited to the FBI or DoD.

Not just domestic American targets either, but places like "Ukraine Crisis Media Center" are what put out guidelines foreign officials must pay attention to, or be threatened with destabilization, as was the case once Zelensky was sworn in:

More swamp:
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, that's just a shame:

Based on NBC (Fake) News report:
Quote:

-Career officials are melting down.

The Trump administration has forced out a majority of career managers and implemented new priorities.

-More than a dozen senior lawyers have been reassigned.

-Some have resigned in frustration after being moved to "less desirable roles unrelated to their expertise."

-The division is now charged with pursuing priorities laid out in a series of Trump's executive orders, including "Keeping Men out of Women's Sports" and "Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling."

-"These documents appear to have been created in a vacuum completely divorced from reality," a former official whined. "This is a 180 shift from the division's traditional mission."

-Many section chiefs have been transferred to roles unrelated to their legal backgrounds, including in the complaint adjudication office and the office that handles public records requests.

-"I was there almost 18 years, and what's happening now is basically the opposite of what we've been doing," whined one veteran lawyer who recently left the department.

-"They are withdrawing everything we've done and taking the opposite side on voting rights, for example," whined a recently departed Civil Division lawyer.

-Dhillon's memo outlines new priorities, including "Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism," "Restoring Merit Based Opportunity" and "Designating English as the Official Language of the United States."

-The "Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias" task force will be a focus. "The Biden administration engaged in an egregious pattern of targeting peaceful Christians while ignoring violent, anti-Christian offenses," Pam Bondi said at a meeting of the new task force.
Quote:

"Every presidential administration has its own policy priorities," said Stacey Young, who spent 18 years in the division before resigning in January, "but I don't think there's any precedent for an administration almost completely refocusing the civil rights division's enforcement priorities the way this one has."

"The loss is truly hard to quantify," added Young, who co-founded Justice Connection, a group now trying to highlight Trump administration changes to the Justice Department. "Vital civil rights work is not going to get done."
Delicious tears. A veritable den of marxists.

Public Integrity (the hive where Jack Smith was stationed prior to becoming chief inquisitor of DJT) and Civil Rights division of DoJ are the two areas most-politicized to go after enemies of the Party when Dems are in charge.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Talk about a blessing in disguise. If the Dems had not used COVID restrictions and mail in ballots as a tool to cheat in the 2020 elections, I doubt Trump would have cleaned house so effectively now.
Trump will fix it.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes. I was running long above but that was my thought too. If Trump had eked out a (legitimate) win in 2020, his second term would have been vastly less consequential, and he wouldn't have brought in nearly the same degree of radical change agents (a la doge etc).

Frankly, he wouldn't have had the time, nor even really the mandate to do all of this. I'd just add, I think the lawfare against him also highly increased his resolve in this respect (including the Internews/fake news coverage of it all).
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

Yes. I was running long above but that was my thought too. If Trump had eked out a (legitimate) win in 2020, his second term would have been vastly less consequential, and he wouldn't have brought in nearly the same degree of radical change agents (a la doge etc).

Frankly, he wouldn't have had the time, nor even really the mandate to do all of this. I'd just add, I think the lawfare against him also highly increased his resolve in this respect (including the Internews/fake news coverage of it all).
They would have continued to impeach him and Pence would have subverted him at every turn as well as his cabinet and we know USAID and the deep state would thrive. It would have been a disaster. We'd also have a far lefty loon as POTUS with at least half of congress Dem maybe both.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Strengthening Probationary Periods in the Federal Service (Trump EO Tracker)


The Order institutes a new Civil Service Rule XI to ensure agencies effectively utilize probationary and trial periods. Civil Service Rule XI supersedes subpart H and requires agencies to affirmatively determine that the continued employment of individuals serving probationary or trial periods would benefit the federal service before the appointment is finalized.

Civil Service Rule II is amended by removing section 2.4 of part 2 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations. The rule determines the meaning of a probationary and trial period and sets guidance for assessment at the end of the trial or probationary period.

At the completion of the period, the employee will either be terminated from their agency or certified as an appointment that advances public interest. The Order is effective immediately, and the requirements will become effective 90 days from April 24, 2025.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:



BREAKING: "Bloodbath" at DOJ Civil Rights Division as Harmeet Dhillon cleans house NBC News

-Career officials are melting down.

The Trump administration has forced out a majority of career managers and implemented new priorities.

-More than a dozen senior lawyers have been reassigned.

-Some have resigned in frustration after being moved to "less desirable roles unrelated to their expertise."

-The division is now charged with pursuing priorities laid out in a series of Trump's executive orders, including "Keeping Men out of Women's Sports" and "Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling."

-"These documents appear to have been created in a vacuum completely divorced from reality," a former official whined. "This is a 180 shift from the division's traditional mission."

-Many section chiefs have been transferred to roles unrelated to their legal backgrounds, including in the complaint adjudication office and the office that handles public records requests.

-"I was there almost 18 years, and what's happening now is basically the opposite of what we've been doing," whined one veteran lawyer who recently left the department.

-"They are withdrawing everything we've done and taking the opposite side on voting rights, for example," whined a recently departed Civil Division lawyer.

-Dhillon's memo outlines new priorities, including "Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism," "Restoring Merit Based Opportunity" and "Designating English as the Official Language of the United States."

-The "Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias" task force will be a focus. "The Biden administration engaged in an egregious pattern of targeting peaceful Christians while ignoring violent, anti-Christian offenses," Pam Bondi said at a meeting of the new task force.
Stop, stop! I am going to need to see a doctor if this erection lasts much longer.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not sure what thread to put this in (might deserve it's own), but wow.

Eso si, Que es
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Any chance you can post the text for us non x ers
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

For many years after the 1950 passage of the Federal Records Act (FRA), agency records, almost exclusively maintained on paper, were routinely separated by records management staff between 'active' records and 'dormant' records.

Control of active agency records - these were the records in desk drawers, inboxes, office file cabinets, etc. - remained with the individual or organization that originally created them for as long as the records remained in active use.

After active records use began to drop - typically over a short period - these paper records would be recategorized as 'dormant'. In compliance with the FRA, this change in status had two important implications.

First, the paper record was physically moved from wherever it was maintained in its active status to the agency's onsite records preservation facility or an affiliated regional Federal Records Center.

Second, control (technically speaking, 'custodianship') of the paper record was legally transferred from the individual or organization that created the record to the agency, represented by the agency's records management program.
2/7
Once custodianship had been transferred to the agency and the record was physically moved into a compliant preservation facility, the record was secured there through the remainder of its National Archives and Records Administration (NARA)-approved retention period, and access to the record was only granted by the agency's records management program.

Even the record's original creator could not access the record without express permission from the proper agency records management officials.

The transfer of custodianship to the agency and the accession of the paper record to a secure facility served a critically important purpose that very few members of the American public understand. As a country founded by The People, for The People, all recorded Federal government information belongs to the American people. It does not belong to the government. The government is only responsible for its faithful stewardship as servants of the American people.

As I noted a few weeks ago in the post below, the procedures for managing electronic Federal records were designed to closely follow the procedures that had been in place for paper records for decades. This included a digital agency 'records center' created to meet the Department of Defense's DoD 5015.2 specification for an electronic agency records repository.

It was into these records repositories that dormant electronic records were to be accessioned, and custodianship of the record was to be transferred.

At least, that was the plan.
3/7
Earlier this month, the nation's top vaccine regulator, FDA vaccine chief Dr. Peter Marks, was forced to resign after he refused to provide access to records in the agency's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to associates of his boss, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Dr. Marks had no right to deny Secretary Kennedy's associates access to the VAERS records they were looking for because he was no longer custodian according to Federal records management regulations.

The VAERS records to which Dr. Marks denied Secretary Kennedy access should have been removed from the VAERS system and transferred to the FDA's 36 CFR 1236.20-compliant electronic records repository, where custodianship of the records would have been transferred to the agency. Because the dormant VAERS records now belonged to the agency, Secretary Kennedy's associates would never have needed to ask Dr. Marks for permission to access them.
4/7
But, as reported in this March 2020 Epoch Times article, no Federal agency - including the FDA - ever deployed DoD 5015.2-certified electronic records repositories into an agency production environment.

This meant that the VAERS records never left the system in which they were originally created. And their custodianship remained in the hands of government bureaucrats - likely forever - who were able to alter, hide, or destroy them anytime they wanted…or deny access to them, even to the Secretary of Health and Human Services…
5/7
Threadreader link here. I don't want to post more than allowed. The bottom line is our antiquated gov't computer/data systems are used to hide info even from department heads such as Kennedy. It's not classification-based, but custodial records shenanigans.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92 said:

will25u said:



BREAKING: "Bloodbath" at DOJ Civil Rights Division as Harmeet Dhillon cleans house NBC News

-Career officials are melting down.

The Trump administration has forced out a majority of career managers and implemented new priorities.

-More than a dozen senior lawyers have been reassigned.

-Some have resigned in frustration after being moved to "less desirable roles unrelated to their expertise."

-The division is now charged with pursuing priorities laid out in a series of Trump's executive orders, including "Keeping Men out of Women's Sports" and "Ending Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling."

-"These documents appear to have been created in a vacuum completely divorced from reality," a former official whined. "This is a 180 shift from the division's traditional mission."

-Many section chiefs have been transferred to roles unrelated to their legal backgrounds, including in the complaint adjudication office and the office that handles public records requests.

-"I was there almost 18 years, and what's happening now is basically the opposite of what we've been doing," whined one veteran lawyer who recently left the department.

-"They are withdrawing everything we've done and taking the opposite side on voting rights, for example," whined a recently departed Civil Division lawyer.

-Dhillon's memo outlines new priorities, including "Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism," "Restoring Merit Based Opportunity" and "Designating English as the Official Language of the United States."

-The "Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias" task force will be a focus. "The Biden administration engaged in an egregious pattern of targeting peaceful Christians while ignoring violent, anti-Christian offenses," Pam Bondi said at a meeting of the new task force.
Stop, stop! I am going to need to see a doctor if this erection lasts much longer.
6+ hours seems pretty reasonable
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump will fix it.
outofstateaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

Threadreader link here. I don't want to post more than allowed. The bottom line is our antiquated gov't computer/data systems are used to hide info even from department heads such as Kennedy. It's not classification-based, but custodial records shenanigans.


Good Lord.

Wretched hive of scum and villainy.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


Two independent sources tell NPR:
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do those DOGE employees have the proper clearances? Doesn't every administration have employees with that access? Is it somehow different with Trump's employees? This is bait, it's not news at all.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NPR can't be cut off from the money *****et fast enough.

They wouldn't print anything favorable or even simply balanced about this administration if you told them the federal government would keep paying them their graft.
We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
good lord that article.... anonymous sources, accounts that "could access" even though it has multiple other safeguards including being in specific physical locations/rooms to access data...

It is like saying I was hired by DOGE and given a government laptop therefor I "could initiate the nuclear launch codes." Yeah, extreme hyperbole, but the hoops they jumped through to make those anonymous source claims....
Hondo.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
> this thread is for discussing gov agency/personnel changes. Stop derailing please. <
edit: looks like the posts got cleaned up
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brainwashed communists can't help themselves
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Interesting good news about the deep state being more supportive of DJT this time, other than treasonous Kamala voters.
Quote:

Washington, D.C., plan to oppose President Donald Trump from within the governmenta deep state taking shape in his second term.

D.C.-based bureaucrats are split along partisan lines, with Republicans planning to support the president and Democrats planning to oppose him, according to an RMG Research survey commissioned by the Napolitan Institute to coincide with Trump's first 100 days in office. A whopping 75% of bureaucrats who voted for Vice President Kamala Harris in November say they would disobey a lawful Trump order if they consider it bad policy.

In a refreshing change from Trump's first term, Republicans in the government largely plan to support the president, the survey finds. This means the Trump 47 deep state phenomenon falls along partisan lines, as opposed to the Trump 45 deep state, in which many Republicans joined Democrats.
While this partisan divide reflects the polarization in the electorate, it still seems remarkable that people who work for the government plan to undermine the president from within his own administration.
Who Are 'Federal Government Managers?'

RMG Research, the firm led by Scott Rasmussen, conducted three surveys in mid-March to study three different segments of the population. The polling firm focused on what it calls the Elite 1% who have postgraduate degrees, earn more than $150,000 annually, and live in densely populated areas; Main Street Americans who meet none of these three criteria and who represent between 70% and 75% of the U.S. population; and Federal Government Managersfederal employees who live in the National Capital Region around Washington and earn at least $75,000 annually.
Quote:

The RMG Research survey found that bureaucrats and the Elite 1% tend not to see eye to eye with voters.
When asked if government control and regulation of the economy would be better or worse for the economy, bureaucrats and elites proved more likely to favor government.

Voters proved more likely to say less government control and regulation would be better (53%) than more control (28%). Democratic bureaucrats favored more control (51%) over less (38%), and Republican bureaucrats also preferred more control (55%) over less (44%). More elites also favored more control (50%) over less (40%).

A different RMG Research survey in March found that 77% of voters fault the government for paying "not enough attention to what voters want."
Democrat bureaucrats are an enemy of the republic, as the data shows. TDS stage-5 sufferers within the government are just sad people.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

Interesting good news about the deep state being more supportive of DJT this time, other than treasonous Kamala voters.
Quote:

Washington, D.C., plan to oppose President Donald Trump from within the governmenta deep state taking shape in his second term.

D.C.-based bureaucrats are split along partisan lines, with Republicans planning to support the president and Democrats planning to oppose him, according to an RMG Research survey commissioned by the Napolitan Institute to coincide with Trump's first 100 days in office. A whopping 75% of bureaucrats who voted for Vice President Kamala Harris in November say they would disobey a lawful Trump order if they consider it bad policy.

In a refreshing change from Trump's first term, Republicans in the government largely plan to support the president, the survey finds. This means the Trump 47 deep state phenomenon falls along partisan lines, as opposed to the Trump 45 deep state, in which many Republicans joined Democrats.
While this partisan divide reflects the polarization in the electorate, it still seems remarkable that people who work for the government plan to undermine the president from within his own administration.
Who Are 'Federal Government Managers?'

RMG Research, the firm led by Scott Rasmussen, conducted three surveys in mid-March to study three different segments of the population. The polling firm focused on what it calls the Elite 1% who have postgraduate degrees, earn more than $150,000 annually, and live in densely populated areas; Main Street Americans who meet none of these three criteria and who represent between 70% and 75% of the U.S. population; and Federal Government Managersfederal employees who live in the National Capital Region around Washington and earn at least $75,000 annually.
Quote:

The RMG Research survey found that bureaucrats and the Elite 1% tend not to see eye to eye with voters.
When asked if government control and regulation of the economy would be better or worse for the economy, bureaucrats and elites proved more likely to favor government.

Voters proved more likely to say less government control and regulation would be better (53%) than more control (28%). Democratic bureaucrats favored more control (51%) over less (38%), and Republican bureaucrats also preferred more control (55%) over less (44%). More elites also favored more control (50%) over less (40%).

A different RMG Research survey in March found that 77% of voters fault the government for paying "not enough attention to what voters want."
Democrat bureaucrats are an enemy of the republic, as the data shows. TDS stage-5 sufferers within the government are just sad people.

Fire them if they disobey directives.
Trump will fix it.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
F16 may find this small vignette of interest when discussing the purge of the DEEP STATE

today in the email discussion group for the Defense Trade Advisory Group the subject line was:

"State Department Lawyer Seeking New Employment"

one of the members was asking on behalf of her "good friend" who is now seeking another job.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


I imagine this has the leakers puckered up. And if you file suit to stop it, you're pretty much incriminating yourself.

Not bad. Not bad at all.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hegseth ends woke women peace security BS program. He's not even ashamed.
Quote:

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declared Tuesday that he had begun to shutter a Pentagon program meant to advance women's participation in peace-building and conflict prevention, which was created by a law written by GOP lawmakers and signed by President Trump during his first term.

"This morning, I proudly ENDED the 'Women, Peace & Security' (WPS) program inside the [Defense Department]," Hegseth wrote in a post on the social platform X.

He said the program was "yet another woke divisive/social justice Biden initiative that overburdens our commanders and troops distracting from our core task: WAR-FIGHTING."

Hegseth also called WPS a "UNITED NATIONS program pushed by feminists and left-wing activists," claiming that "troops HATE it."

As the program is under federal statute and can't be outright killed by Hegseth alone, he said the Pentagon would comply with the minimum requirements of the WPS and fight to end the program during the department's next appropriations process.

Letterman is still funny to me.
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


This will be interesting. The President appoints the members of the BoD, but I don't see anything in the charter about dismissing Board members:

  • (b) Establishment of Corporation; application of District of Columbia Nonprofit Corporation ActThere is authorized to be established a nonprofit corporation, to be known as the "Corporation for Public Broadcasting," which will not be an agency or establishment of the United States Government. The Corporation shall be subject to the provisions of this section, and, to the extent consistent with this section, to the District of Columbia Nonprofit Corporation Act.
  • (c) Board of Directors; functions, duties, etc.
  • (1) The Corporation for Public Broadcasting shall have a Board of Directors (hereinafter in this section referred to as the "Board"), consisting of 9 members appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. No more than 5 members of the Board appointed by the President may be members of the same political party.
  • (2) The 9 members of the Board appointed by the President (A) shall be selected from among citizens of the United States (not regular full-time employees of the United States) who are eminent in such fields as education, cultural and civic affairs, or the arts, including radio and television; and (B) shall be selected so as to provide as nearly as practicable a broad representation of various regions of the Nation, various professions and occupations, and various kinds of talent and experience appropriate to the functions and responsibilities of the Corporation.

and then there is this:

  • 398. Federal interference or control

  • (a) ProhibitionNothing contained in this part shall be deemed (1) to amend any other provision of, or requirement under, this chapter; or (2) except to the extent authorized in subsection (b) of this section, to authorize any department, agency, officer, or employee of the United States to exercise any direction, supervision, or control over public telecommunications, or over the Corporation or any of its grantees or contractors, or over the charter or bylaws of the Corporation, or over the curriculum, program of instruction, or personnel of any educational institution, school system, or public telecommunications entity.

Nothing like setting up an organization with taxpayer funds that is completely out of the control of taxpayer or their representatives in government. Congress needs to just abolish the damned thing. I hope Trump is at least upsetting the apple cart there. I doubt the courts go along with him though.

https://cpb.org/aboutpb/act
The best way to keep evil men from wielding great power is to not create great power in the first place.
whoop1995
How long do you want to ignore this user?
American Hardwood said:

will25u said:


This will be interesting. The President appoints the members of the BoD, but I don't see anything in the charter about dismissing Board members:

  • (b) Establishment of Corporation; application of District of Columbia Nonprofit Corporation ActThere is authorized to be established a nonprofit corporation, to be known as the "Corporation for Public Broadcasting," which will not be an agency or establishment of the United States Government. The Corporation shall be subject to the provisions of this section, and, to the extent consistent with this section, to the District of Columbia Nonprofit Corporation Act.
  • (c) Board of Directors; functions, duties, etc.
  • (1) The Corporation for Public Broadcasting shall have a Board of Directors (hereinafter in this section referred to as the "Board"), consisting of 9 members appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. No more than 5 members of the Board appointed by the President may be members of the same political party.
  • (2) The 9 members of the Board appointed by the President (A) shall be selected from among citizens of the United States (not regular full-time employees of the United States) who are eminent in such fields as education, cultural and civic affairs, or the arts, including radio and television; and (B) shall be selected so as to provide as nearly as practicable a broad representation of various regions of the Nation, various professions and occupations, and various kinds of talent and experience appropriate to the functions and responsibilities of the Corporation.

and then there is this:

  • 398. Federal interference or control
  • (a) ProhibitionNothing contained in this part shall be deemed (1) to amend any other provision of, or requirement under, this chapter; or (2) except to the extent authorized in subsection (b) of this section, to authorize any department, agency, officer, or employee of the United States to exercise any direction, supervision, or control over public telecommunications, or over the Corporation or any of its grantees or contractors, or over the charter or bylaws of the Corporation, or over the curriculum, program of instruction, or personnel of any educational institution, school system, or public telecommunications entity.

Nothing like setting up an organization with taxpayer funds that is completely out of the control of taxpayer or their representatives in government. Congress needs to just abolish the damned thing. I hope Trump is at least upsetting the apple cart there. I doubt the courts go along with him though.

https://cpb.org/aboutpb/act

There certainly are a lot of these cushy untouchable jobs floating around.

Sorry forgot to add untouchable.
I collect ticket stubs! looking for a 1944 orange bowl and 1981 independence bowl ticket stub as well as Aggie vs tu stubs - 1926 and below, 1935-1937, 1939-1944, 1946-1948, 1950, 1953, 1956-1957, 1959, 1960, 1963-1966, 1969-1970, 1973, 1974, 1980, 1984, 1990, 2004, 2008
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hegseth not know it was a Trump program?

I'm Gipper
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.