No doubt. I just began following her, and her Twitter posts are half reporting, half drama
Marvin said:AgBQ-00 said:
refuting what claim?
Anthony's claim that the victim put his hands on him, which is his apparent justification for the stabbing. Do we know if there is video evidence of this?
Sorry, I've tried to keep up but may have missed it.
Marvin said:AgBQ-00 said:
refuting what claim?
Anthony's claim that the victim put his hands on him, which is his apparent justification for the stabbing. Do we know if there is video evidence of this?
Sorry, I've tried to keep up but may have missed it.
jrdaustin said:Marvin said:AgBQ-00 said:
refuting what claim?
Anthony's claim that the victim put his hands on him, which is his apparent justification for the stabbing. Do we know if there is video evidence of this?
Sorry, I've tried to keep up but may have missed it.
Placing your hands on someone may be offensive, but it's not an action that warrants fatal self defense response.
You cannot warn someone "Touch me and see what happens", and be justified in stabbing them when they touch you.
That's what this trial boils down to.
jrdaustin said:Marvin said:AgBQ-00 said:
refuting what claim?
Anthony's claim that the victim put his hands on him, which is his apparent justification for the stabbing. Do we know if there is video evidence of this?
Sorry, I've tried to keep up but may have missed it.
Placing your hands on someone may be offensive, but it's not an action that warrants fatal self defense response.
You cannot warn someone "Touch me and see what happens", and be justified in stabbing them when they touch you.
That's what this trial boils down to.
aggiehawg said:Marvin said:AgBQ-00 said:
refuting what claim?
Anthony's claim that the victim put his hands on him, which is his apparent justification for the stabbing. Do we know if there is video evidence of this?
Sorry, I've tried to keep up but may have missed it.
The recap of yesterday's testimony that I posted earlier said the surveillance cameras, not the best quality, apparently shows someone dressed in Austin's clothing (can't make out the face) does apparently shove someone dressed in Anthony's clothing. There is a jolting type movement. That is all that I know about.
agent-maroon said:
How is that not a confession? Or maybe that's already established and I missed that somehow?
flown-the-coop said:
I assume there is no history of interaction between Anthony and Metcalf? I am not sure its a legit defense, but if Metcalf had whooped Anthony's tail in a previous altercation, then I could understand Anthony being predisposed to what is still on overreaction in my opinion.
Just a question. Not defending Anthony in the least. The kid seems feral and should be permanently caged. Just pondering what else the defense could come up with.
flown-the-coop said:
I assume there is no history of interaction between Anthony and Metcalf? I am not sure its a legit defense, but if Metcalf had whooped Anthony's tail in a previous altercation, then I could understand Anthony being predisposed to what is still on overreaction in my opinion.
Just a question. Not defending Anthony in the least. The kid seems feral and should be permanently caged. Just pondering what else the defense could come up with.
agent-maroon said:
How is that not a confession? Or maybe that's already established and I missed that somehow?
spencerdhg said:flown-the-coop said:
I assume there is no history of interaction between Anthony and Metcalf? I am not sure its a legit defense, but if Metcalf had whooped Anthony's tail in a previous altercation, then I could understand Anthony being predisposed to what is still on overreaction in my opinion.
Just a question. Not defending Anthony in the least. The kid seems feral and should be permanently caged. Just pondering what else the defense could come up with.
Even if there had been a previous altercation, Anthony's presence in their tent when he was not even participating in the meet is a provocative move especially considering he had a knife with him.
Ellis Wyatt said:
Stand your ground has nothing to do with murdering an unarmed man who pushed you.
A Net Full of Jello said:agent-maroon said:
How is that not a confession? Or maybe that's already established and I missed that somehow?
He isn't denying he stabbed Austin; his defense is that it was justified because he had a reasonable fear for his life. It was really the only possible defense that could go with, considering there is something like 20 people who saw him do it.
Ellis Wyatt said:
They're muddying the water.
The kid is a thug and a murderer. He should have taken a plea deal instead of allowing this nastiness and all the racism that has been encouraged.
schmellba99 said:Ellis Wyatt said:
They're muddying the water.
The kid is a thug and a murderer. He should have taken a plea deal instead of allowing this nastiness and all the racism that has been encouraged.
Do you really think that thought ever entered his mind, his lawyer's mind or his worthless thug family's mind?
Ellis Wyatt said:
They're muddying the water.
The kid is a thug and a murderer. He should have taken a plea deal instead of allowing this nastiness and all the racism that has been encouraged.
Bull Meachem said:schmellba99 said:Ellis Wyatt said:
They're muddying the water.
The kid is a thug and a murderer. He should have taken a plea deal instead of allowing this nastiness and all the racism that has been encouraged.
Do you really think that thought ever entered his mind, his lawyer's mind or his worthless thug family's mind?
He doesn't owe anyone else a thing when thinking about his options for defense. That's just silly.
normalhorn said:
Does the Officer's body cam video damage defense's argument for Stand Your Ground? Murderer had the means and opportunity to flee the victim's presence when he felt his life was in jeopardy, but proceeded to stay in proximity with the victim
YokelRidesAgain said:normalhorn said:
Does the Officer's body cam video damage defense's argument for Stand Your Ground? Murderer had the means and opportunity to flee the victim's presence when he felt his life was in jeopardy, but proceeded to stay in proximity with the victim
"Stand your ground" means that you don't have a legal obligation to retreat if able (e.g., if someone comes in your home with a knife and you could climb out of an open window instead of shooting them, you don't have a legal obligation to do that).
The framework the defense is trying to lay is that Anthony did not have an obligation to leave the tent when Metcalf told him to, which is likely true as a matter of law.
That is a necessary but not sufficient part of his attempt at a self defense claim; the problem for Anthony is that being pushed or shoved does not create a reasonable basis for fearing for one's life.
ShaggySLC said:
The first witness ruined that by explaining what the track tents mean and the culture
YokelRidesAgain said:ShaggySLC said:
The first witness ruined that by explaining what the track tents mean and the culture
I don't disagree that Anthony likely knew he wasn't supposed to be in there, but track meet rules aren't legally binding.
The case is entirely about whether Anthony was legitimately in fear for his life, which he wasn't. In the absence of that, nothing else matters.
Ellis Wyatt said:
The kid is a thug and a murderer. He should have taken a plea deal instead of allowing this nastiness and all the racism that has been encouraged.