***** 2025-2026 San Antonio Spurs Thread *****

19,582 Views | 299 Replies | Last: 16 hrs ago by FTAG 2000
2008and1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
West Texan said:

The fact that Duncan never won a dpoy is still criminal.


DPOY was always a "who had the highest counting stat" award through Timmy's entire career. There was always somone else with a big blocks year or big steals year that took it. Timmy was never the league leader in these, just always consistently near the top.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Post moves downloading
jteagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Seems like Wemby was everywhere this summer!
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Giddey wanted 30/year, Bulls wanted 20/year and they met in the middle.



That's only about 15% of the cap. I think it's pretty good value if last year wasn't a fluke.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lowe out here acting like ESPN still pays him. Thinks the NBA sweeps it under the rug or gives minor penalties like a small fine and loss of 2nd.

jteagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LawHall88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup said:

Lowe out here acting like ESPN still pays him. Thinks the NBA sweeps it under the rug or gives minor penalties like a small fine and loss of 2nd.



Sure sounds like Silver has already made up his mind.
Obi Wan Ginobili
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LawHall88 said:

Guitarsoup said:

Lowe out here acting like ESPN still pays him. Thinks the NBA sweeps it under the rug or gives minor penalties like a small fine and loss of 2nd.



Sure sounds like Silver has already made up his mind.



Definitely sounds like Silver is gently letting everyone know that Ballmer's Billions outweigh public perception. Bold strategy.
superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Still up in the air to me. Saw a quote about their not being a timeline, so that seems like it's going to be thorough. I've seen quotes about some teams being super pissed. And nobody can ignore that Ballmer's intense wealth changes everything. Owners have incentive to side with the Clippers if they've got their own shady things to hide. Owners have incentive to side against the Clippers becauae duh, cheating *******s should pay.

Feels like this ambiguity (will we ever know what the BoG -really' thinks?) gives Silver the room to come up with a solution knowing he has got something to hold over everyone's head. Nobody is "winning" this mess.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Everything else aside, no one is giving a player with the personality of a used Amazon box a $48 million dollar contract that requires them to do ****all besides cashing checks.
jteagle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good stuff here!
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
More

Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG



I love that silver makes those comments like they're going to sweep it under the rug. NBA has to prove something and then Pablo dropped something else
superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Saw some clips super early this morning but just now getting to the full episode. There was even a tease a little yesterday but this is far beyond any "we didn't know!" cover the team could hide behind.

Dennis Wong's daughter worked for Aspiration. Lmao
Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
superunknown said:

Still up in the air to me. Saw a quote about their not being a timeline, so that seems like it's going to be thorough. I've seen quotes about some teams being super pissed. And nobody can ignore that Ballmer's intense wealth changes everything. Owners have incentive to side with the Clippers if they've got their own shady things to hide. Owners have incentive to side against the Clippers becauae duh, cheating *******s should pay.

Feels like this ambiguity (will we ever know what the BoG -really' thinks?) gives Silver the room to come up with a solution knowing he has got something to hold over everyone's head. Nobody is "winning" this mess.


I have been trying to think of what punishment would be fitting for this situation-specifically how can it punish the Clippers and Kawhi, without tremendously helping the Thunder and Sixers, who own future picks (or pick swaps) with the Clippers. And would Kawhi even care if he was suspended for a significant amount of time? The guy "self-suspends" so regularly that I'm not sure that a 50-game punishment would be a negative for him.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Iowaggie said:

superunknown said:

Still up in the air to me. Saw a quote about their not being a timeline, so that seems like it's going to be thorough. I've seen quotes about some teams being super pissed. And nobody can ignore that Ballmer's intense wealth changes everything. Owners have incentive to side with the Clippers if they've got their own shady things to hide. Owners have incentive to side against the Clippers becauae duh, cheating *******s should pay.

Feels like this ambiguity (will we ever know what the BoG -really' thinks?) gives Silver the room to come up with a solution knowing he has got something to hold over everyone's head. Nobody is "winning" this mess.


I have been trying to think of what punishment would be fitting for this situation-specifically how can it punish the Clippers and Kawhi, without tremendously helping the Thunder and Sixers, who own future picks (or pick swaps) with the Clippers. And would Kawhi even care if he was suspended for a significant amount of time? The guy "self-suspends" so regularly that I'm not sure that a 50-game punishment would be a negative for him.


He's still getting paid when he sits out.

Voiding his contact and making him pay back his endorsement is going to hurt him real bad
Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup said:

Iowaggie said:

superunknown said:

Still up in the air to me. Saw a quote about their not being a timeline, so that seems like it's going to be thorough. I've seen quotes about some teams being super pissed. And nobody can ignore that Ballmer's intense wealth changes everything. Owners have incentive to side with the Clippers if they've got their own shady things to hide. Owners have incentive to side against the Clippers becauae duh, cheating *******s should pay.

Feels like this ambiguity (will we ever know what the BoG -really' thinks?) gives Silver the room to come up with a solution knowing he has got something to hold over everyone's head. Nobody is "winning" this mess.


I have been trying to think of what punishment would be fitting for this situation-specifically how can it punish the Clippers and Kawhi, without tremendously helping the Thunder and Sixers, who own future picks (or pick swaps) with the Clippers. And would Kawhi even care if he was suspended for a significant amount of time? The guy "self-suspends" so regularly that I'm not sure that a 50-game punishment would be a negative for him.


He's still getting paid when he sits out.

Voiding his contact and making him pay back his endorsement is going to hurt him real bad


I was referring to him being suspended, similar to Ja's 25-game suspension that cost him over $7mm, so he was not paid during his suspension.

"When we have a standard for conduct detrimental, at the end of the day, it's one based on what we see as the values of this league and what our expectations from our players are in terms of the image we're portraying to our fans. So, it's not a legal standard. It's a private organization standard." - Adam Silver


If Silver's punishment for Morant is based on deterring future behavior that is harmful to the league, doing side deals that circumvent the salary cap is way worse than a 1-second gun flash on Ja's friend's Instagram Live (accidentally) that followed a suspension/warning from the commish earlier. Grizzlies got "cap-relief" during the suspension.

Kawhi's crew had been warned post-2019. Probably more than once. It was an obvious, premeditated plan to circumvent the cap. This isn't a surprise for KL camp that what he did broke the rules.



I suppose the way to come down strongly on this is to suspend Kawhi without pay for the season (or more), but not give the Clippers cap relief. (Yes, void the contract and not let him back in the league). Punish the player strongly, and do not make it fatal to the organization.

Again, I don't know.





Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Iowaggie said:

Guitarsoup said:

Iowaggie said:

superunknown said:

Still up in the air to me. Saw a quote about their not being a timeline, so that seems like it's going to be thorough. I've seen quotes about some teams being super pissed. And nobody can ignore that Ballmer's intense wealth changes everything. Owners have incentive to side with the Clippers if they've got their own shady things to hide. Owners have incentive to side against the Clippers becauae duh, cheating *******s should pay.

Feels like this ambiguity (will we ever know what the BoG -really' thinks?) gives Silver the room to come up with a solution knowing he has got something to hold over everyone's head. Nobody is "winning" this mess.


I have been trying to think of what punishment would be fitting for this situation-specifically how can it punish the Clippers and Kawhi, without tremendously helping the Thunder and Sixers, who own future picks (or pick swaps) with the Clippers. And would Kawhi even care if he was suspended for a significant amount of time? The guy "self-suspends" so regularly that I'm not sure that a 50-game punishment would be a negative for him.


He's still getting paid when he sits out.

Voiding his contact and making him pay back his endorsement is going to hurt him real bad


I was referring to him being suspended, similar to Ja's 25-game suspension that cost him over $7mm, so he was not paid during his suspension.

"When we have a standard for conduct detrimental, at the end of the day, it's one based on what we see as the values of this league and what our expectations from our players are in terms of the image we're portraying to our fans. So, it's not a legal standard. It's a private organization standard." - Adam Silver


If Silver's punishment for Morant is based on deterring future behavior that is harmful to the league, doing side deals that circumvent the salary cap is way worse than a 1-second gun flash on Ja's friend's Instagram Live (accidentally) that followed a suspension/warning from the commish earlier. Grizzlies got "cap-relief" during the suspension.

Kawhi's crew had been warned post-2019. Probably more than once. It was an obvious, premeditated plan to circumvent the cap. This isn't a surprise for KL camp that what he did broke the rules.



I suppose the way to come down strongly on this is to suspend Kawhi without pay for the season (or more), but not give the Clippers cap relief. (Yes, void the contract and not let him back in the league). Punish the player strongly, and do not make it fatal to the organization.

Again, I don't know.


There are specific punishments in the Cap Circumvention section of the CBA and they don't actually include suspension.

For player:

* max 350k fine
* contract voided
* Forced to pay back fake endorsement deal


For team:
* 1y suspension for anyone that knew
* loss of draft picks (no limit)
* $7.5M fine

Like you said before, pretty much all the solutions help OKC. Also, the team should have to pay the retroactive luxury tax with interest to the other teams.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Windy coming around.
superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pablo is whipping ESPNs ass on this.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
superunknown said:

Pablo is whipping ESPNs ass on this.

Was really nice to see him let Ballmer take the softballs, let ESPN carry the water then bring out Wong. Played perfectly
HummingbirdSaltalamacchia
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
superunknown said:

Pablo is whipping ESPNs ass on this.


He certainly is. Admittedly, there's a very small part of me that questions his "journalistic integrity" when it definitely seems like her baited Balmer and the clippers and the NBA with that. Seems like he's trying to stick it to them rather than being an unbiased journalist.

But that far greater majority of me is like **** the clippers and balmer. And especially **** uncle Dennis and Kawhi.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HummingbirdSaltalamacchia said:

superunknown said:

Pablo is whipping ESPNs ass on this.


He certainly is. Admittedly, there's a very small part of me that questions his "journalistic integrity" when it definitely seems like her baited Balmer and the clippers and the NBA with that. Seems like he's trying to stick it to them rather than being an unbiased journalist.

But that far greater majority of me is like **** the clippers and balmer. And especially **** uncle Dennis and Kawhi.


That's bull***** There's no code of ethics that says you have to report on everything you know all at once. There's no way for him to know how Ballmer will react or what he will say.

It's not uncommon for investigative reports to be multi-part and Pablo has done that in the past with his reports.

If Ballmer is honest, he doesn't get caught in lies.
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I said earlier on this thread that Silver likely planned to sweep this under the rug lol. Then Silver speaks basically confirming that fact with his whole can't act on the appearance of impropriety crap. Ballmer probably lit up a cigar while listening to Silver speaks knowing that the investigation would conclude that he was an idiot for investing but that the payments from Aspiration wouldn't definitively prove he was circumventing the cap. Basically just continue to act like you got played and this all goes away.

Now Pablo jumps back in from the top rope to remind everyone that this story is basically impossible to deny. Ballmer for all his money, is an idiot money launderer. His college roommate lol.

I hope Pablo has one more saved round ready to go also.
EastSideAg2002
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guys with that much money are good at bending the rules.
superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup said:

HummingbirdSaltalamacchia said:

superunknown said:

Pablo is whipping ESPNs ass on this.


He certainly is. Admittedly, there's a very small part of me that questions his "journalistic integrity" when it definitely seems like her baited Balmer and the clippers and the NBA with that. Seems like he's trying to stick it to them rather than being an unbiased journalist.

But that far greater majority of me is like **** the clippers and balmer. And especially **** uncle Dennis and Kawhi.


That's bull***** There's no code of ethics that says you have to report on everything you know all at once. There's no way for him to know how Ballmer will react or what he will say.

It's not uncommon for investigative reports to be multi-part and Pablo has done that in the past with his reports.

If Ballmer is honest, he doesn't get caught in lies.


I had a big ol reply typed out but it was too wonky and probably hokey "ok boomer" type stuff but damn...I'll just say its a damn shame actual journalism isn't a profit center, because none of the big companies will ever break any investigative type stories again...they'll cover breaking news that they can't ignore, but forget anything like Pablo sinking his teeth into the Kawhi saga coming from a big company.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hope they lifetime ban Dennis the menace in this too.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ballmer made a separate $9.99M investment into the failing Aspiration after the Wong investment.

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6624269/2025/09/12/clippers-steve-ballmer-kawhi-leonard-aspiration-investment-sponsorship/

18 months after he was "scammed" out of that $50M.

Quote:

As part of the agreement, Sanberg also pressured the company to pay for fees incurred by Frankel, who did not respond to The Athletic's request for comment.

That's crazy. Sanberg wanted Aspiration to give Kawhi MORE money to cover his agent's fees.

What he was required to do and the opt out:

Quote:

The contract specified that Leonard would, among other asks, participate in one eight-hour day of production, one four-hour day of public relations, two one-hour community service events, one five-minute segment per week "in conversation with (Clippers) Coach Ty Lue" while he sat out the 2021-22 season recovering from an injury, "five organic comments/likes/RTs as requested by Aspiration" and three off-court projects.

But the deal, which allowed Aspiration to terminate it for cause or if Leonard was no longer playing for the Clippers, also gave Leonard sign-off on the requests and allowed him to refuse to do anything "not consistent with his beliefs."



"**** them trees"
superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Meanwhile Pablo is about to ruin this dude's prospective House campaign.
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wonder if Ballmer has a fall guy ready to go for this. Come out on Monday and announce that his pool guy was actually the one investing this money.

He's got to of at least considered that this terrible plan would blow up in his face someday right?
LawHall88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guitarsoup said:

Ballmer made a separate $9.99M investment into the failing Aspiration after the Wong investment.

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6624269/2025/09/12/clippers-steve-ballmer-kawhi-leonard-aspiration-investment-sponsorship/

18 months after he was "scammed" out of that $50M.

Quote:

As part of the agreement, Sanberg also pressured the company to pay for fees incurred by Frankel, who did not respond to The Athletic's request for comment.

That's crazy. Sanberg wanted Aspiration to give Kawhi MORE money to cover his agent's fees.

What he was required to do and the opt out:

Quote:

The contract specified that Leonard would, among other asks, participate in one eight-hour day of production, one four-hour day of public relations, two one-hour community service events, one five-minute segment per week "in conversation with (Clippers) Coach Ty Lue" while he sat out the 2021-22 season recovering from an injury, "five organic comments/likes/RTs as requested by Aspiration" and three off-court projects.

But the deal, which allowed Aspiration to terminate it for cause or if Leonard was no longer playing for the Clippers, also gave Leonard sign-off on the requests and allowed him to refuse to do anything "not consistent with his beliefs."



"**** them trees"

Cuban is all in on Team Ballmer.
Guitarsoup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LawHall88 said:

Guitarsoup said:

Ballmer made a separate $9.99M investment into the failing Aspiration after the Wong investment.

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6624269/2025/09/12/clippers-steve-ballmer-kawhi-leonard-aspiration-investment-sponsorship/

18 months after he was "scammed" out of that $50M.

Quote:

As part of the agreement, Sanberg also pressured the company to pay for fees incurred by Frankel, who did not respond to The Athletic's request for comment.

That's crazy. Sanberg wanted Aspiration to give Kawhi MORE money to cover his agent's fees.

What he was required to do and the opt out:

Quote:

The contract specified that Leonard would, among other asks, participate in one eight-hour day of production, one four-hour day of public relations, two one-hour community service events, one five-minute segment per week "in conversation with (Clippers) Coach Ty Lue" while he sat out the 2021-22 season recovering from an injury, "five organic comments/likes/RTs as requested by Aspiration" and three off-court projects.

But the deal, which allowed Aspiration to terminate it for cause or if Leonard was no longer playing for the Clippers, also gave Leonard sign-off on the requests and allowed him to refuse to do anything "not consistent with his beliefs."



"**** them trees"

Cuban is all in on Team Ballmer.


Cuban still ignores that Kawhi didn't have to do a thing and NEVER did a single thing. Not even a RT.

Under the terms of the CBA, if Kawhi got an endorsement from a team sponsor that was grossly out of line with the value performed, it is a violation of the CBA. Cuban is completely ignoring this fact to defend Ballmer.
Iowaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The other question on Cuban's belief that Ballmer was "scammed" on this is that it still doesn't explain the incentive the "scammer" has in giving out $28 million to KL for no benefit to him or his company. How many scammers are looking to give out money?


AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think it tells us something that the best denial Ballmer could come up with was to claim he was scammed.

As you point out, usually when people scam you they want to take your money for their own benefit. It's a pretty lame scam to rob a rich guy and then give almost the entire haul back to one of the employees of the guy you just scammed.

Again, Ballmer is the worst money launderer of all time. Not that I'm am expert here, but it seems like figuring out an arrangement to funnel extra cash to Kawhi shouldn't have been complicated.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.