*****OFFICIAL NATIONWIDE RIOTS IN DEFENSE OF ILLEGALS THREAD*****

300,296 Views | 2641 Replies | Last: 9 days ago by ShaggySLC
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who?mikejones! said:



Sgt, you're going to learn to keep your mouth shut when you have that uniform on


Ooffff…some about to be counting the individual sand on the beach the rest of their contract…
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think counting sand might be the luckiest fate she will have
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stressboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:






He refuses to work for the people of California either. Sounds like a bum.
Jack Ruby
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who?mikejones! said:



Sgt, you're going to learn to keep your mouth shut when you have that uniform on


It takes one to know one.

In no way shape or form has this lady ever served. But even if, there's a clear and cut left-wing extremism going through our ranks in the military, and we need a 1 day stand down struggle session to let everyone know that left wing extremism is rife throughout our ranks, and this left wing communist extremism will not stand.

Looking at you General Milley
TX04Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This narcissist wants to be president so bad, he cant stand it.
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMUallen said:

I think counting sand might be the luckiest fate she will have


Under this SecDef and this SecArmy, she's going to be made an example. I predict everything the UCMJ allows in maximum punishment and a BCD to disqualify her from federal employment and VA benefits. If she is at a location where the President declares an insurrection then the punishments available are far more severe.
Hubert J. Farnsworth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whatever Trump does, he can't back down. We knew the liberals and their foreign allies would throw a hissy fit. Ramp up the deportations of illegals and keep at it. We voted for that.
bmks270
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Curfew? Why how fascist of them..
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Court Martial.
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMUallen said:

fullback44 said:

To be honest this is all pretty much under control, there are a few idiots out there which will either disperse or go to jail. There is no real need for federal guard to be used now. Maybe keep a few in front of federal buildings, no other force is needed at this time. The idiots in LA now have this under control it seems


If National Guard wasn't there at the federal building then things would have gone really sour. They're absolutely still needed. Dont forget this is a fricking Tuesday and "protests" are spreading plus getting more combative


I'm fine with having them protect federal buildings that come under attack, but I'm not for using them anywhere else unless this were to get way way way more out of control. Sure have them in the area and ready to respond if the states don't do their part, however, we don't need the federal guard to be showing up when it's unneeded, that's not a good precedent to set
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who?mikejones! said:




Good, good, good!

Please show up and act foolish so I can see illegals and leftists get destroyed
Hubert J. Farnsworth
How long do you want to ignore this user?


These half-wits have obviously never heard of the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fullback44 said:

TAMUallen said:

fullback44 said:

To be honest this is all pretty much under control, there are a few idiots out there which will either disperse or go to jail. There is no real need for federal guard to be used now. Maybe keep a few in front of federal buildings, no other force is needed at this time. The idiots in LA now have this under control it seems


If National Guard wasn't there at the federal building then things would have gone really sour. They're absolutely still needed. Dont forget this is a fricking Tuesday and "protests" are spreading plus getting more combative


I'm fine with having them protect federal buildings that come under attack, but I'm not for using them anywhere else unless this were to get way way way more out of control. Sure have them in the area and ready to respond if the states don't do their part, however, we don't need the federal guard to be showing up when it's unneeded, that's not a good precedent to set


Why do you keep saying federal guard???
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?


I predict Washington and Oregon will get the natl guard sent on their behalfs
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Federal forces- call them what ever you want
smstork1007
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fullback44 said:

TAMUallen said:

fullback44 said:

To be honest this is all pretty much under control, there are a few idiots out there which will either disperse or go to jail. There is no real need for federal guard to be used now. Maybe keep a few in front of federal buildings, no other force is needed at this time. The idiots in LA now have this under control it seems


If National Guard wasn't there at the federal building then things would have gone really sour. They're absolutely still needed. Dont forget this is a fricking Tuesday and "protests" are spreading plus getting more combative


I'm fine with having them protect federal buildings that come under attack, but I'm not for using them anywhere else unless this were to get way way way more out of control. Sure have them in the area and ready to respond if the states don't do their part, however, we don't need the federal guard to be showing up when it's unneeded, that's not a good precedent to set
They are National Guard, and what you said you are fine with, is ALL they have DONE. It almost like you don't quite know what you want to talk about.
outofstateaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

All of this over ICE catching and deporting criminals. It is sad to see how many complete idiots we have in this country. Liberalism has rotted the minds of Americans.


Not what this is about at all.
mm98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wtf does that city even give their police force for weapons?
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fullback44 said:

TAMUallen said:

fullback44 said:

To be honest this is all pretty much under control, there are a few idiots out there which will either disperse or go to jail. There is no real need for federal guard to be used now. Maybe keep a few in front of federal buildings, no other force is needed at this time. The idiots in LA now have this under control it seems


If National Guard wasn't there at the federal building then things would have gone really sour. They're absolutely still needed. Dont forget this is a fricking Tuesday and "protests" are spreading plus getting more combative


I'm fine with having them protect federal buildings that come under attack, but I'm not for using them anywhere else unless this were to get way way way more out of control. Sure have them in the area and ready to respond if the states don't do their part, however, we don't need the federal guard to be showing up when it's unneeded, that's not a good precedent to set


Crackerjack Ag?
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We are witnessing true insurrection, not the guided tour falsely accused of one on jan 6.
Hubert J. Farnsworth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
outofstateaggie said:

Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

All of this over ICE catching and deporting criminals. It is sad to see how many complete idiots we have in this country. Liberalism has rotted the minds of Americans.


Not what this is about at all.


Then what is it about?
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
smstork1007 said:

fullback44 said:

TAMUallen said:

fullback44 said:

To be honest this is all pretty much under control, there are a few idiots out there which will either disperse or go to jail. There is no real need for federal guard to be used now. Maybe keep a few in front of federal buildings, no other force is needed at this time. The idiots in LA now have this under control it seems


If National Guard wasn't there at the federal building then things would have gone really sour. They're absolutely still needed. Dont forget this is a fricking Tuesday and "protests" are spreading plus getting more combative


I'm fine with having them protect federal buildings that come under attack, but I'm not for using them anywhere else unless this were to get way way way more out of control. Sure have them in the area and ready to respond if the states don't do their part, however, we don't need the federal guard to be showing up when it's unneeded, that's not a good precedent to set
They are National Guard, and what you said you are fine with, is ALL they have DONE. It almost like you don't quite know what you want to talk about.


Bro- I know it's the national guard (federal forces) all I'm saying is watch out what you wish for, Trump deploying the national guard (fed forces) to other places in a city that doesn't need them could lead to other uses down the road. He can protect federal buildings and they can be held in reserve if needed in a city- but they need to be careful and not make this a precedent every time something happens - we don't need them showing up a Aggie games because some Dem is in power and some idiot calls in a threat - that's all that m saying and that my option - no harm no foul bro


And I'm all for deporting these illegals - make them walk home like they got here.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Its not
Its been co opted, just as blm was
outofstateaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hubert J. Farnsworth said:



These half-wits have obviously never heard of the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo.



usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

outofstateaggie said:

Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

All of this over ICE catching and deporting criminals. It is sad to see how many complete idiots we have in this country. Liberalism has rotted the minds of Americans.


Not what this is about at all.


Then what is it about?


Deportation of criminal illegal aliens. The narrative of the left would have you believe it is about all criminals and Latinos to include American Citizens. And the low information people continue to eat it up.
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fullback44 said:

smstork1007 said:

fullback44 said:

TAMUallen said:

fullback44 said:

To be honest this is all pretty much under control, there are a few idiots out there which will either disperse or go to jail. There is no real need for federal guard to be used now. Maybe keep a few in front of federal buildings, no other force is needed at this time. The idiots in LA now have this under control it seems


If National Guard wasn't there at the federal building then things would have gone really sour. They're absolutely still needed. Dont forget this is a fricking Tuesday and "protests" are spreading plus getting more combative


I'm fine with having them protect federal buildings that come under attack, but I'm not for using them anywhere else unless this were to get way way way more out of control. Sure have them in the area and ready to respond if the states don't do their part, however, we don't need the federal guard to be showing up when it's unneeded, that's not a good precedent to set
They are National Guard, and what you said you are fine with, is ALL they have DONE. It almost like you don't quite know what you want to talk about.


Bro- I know it's the national guard (federal forces) all I'm saying is watch out what you wish for, Trump deploying the national guard (fed forces) to other places in a city that doesn't need them could lead to other uses down the road. He can protect federal buildings and they can be held in reserve if needed in a city- but they need to be careful and not make this a precedent every time something happens - we don't need them showing up a Aggie games because some Dem is in power and some idiot calls in a threat - that's all that m saying and that my option - no harm no foul bro


They aren't being used in any capacity except for protecting Federal assets. They are not entering combat, detaining or arresting anyone at this point on time.
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fullback44 said:

smstork1007 said:

fullback44 said:

TAMUallen said:

fullback44 said:

To be honest this is all pretty much under control, there are a few idiots out there which will either disperse or go to jail. There is no real need for federal guard to be used now. Maybe keep a few in front of federal buildings, no other force is needed at this time. The idiots in LA now have this under control it seems


If National Guard wasn't there at the federal building then things would have gone really sour. They're absolutely still needed. Dont forget this is a fricking Tuesday and "protests" are spreading plus getting more combative


I'm fine with having them protect federal buildings that come under attack, but I'm not for using them anywhere else unless this were to get way way way more out of control. Sure have them in the area and ready to respond if the states don't do their part, however, we don't need the federal guard to be showing up when it's unneeded, that's not a good precedent to set
They are National Guard, and what you said you are fine with, is ALL they have DONE. It almost like you don't quite know what you want to talk about.


Bro- I know it's the national guard (federal forces) all I'm saying is watch out what you wish for, Trump deploying the national guard (fed forces) to other places in a city that doesn't need them could lead to other uses down the road. He can protect federal buildings and they can be held in reserve if needed in a city- but they need to be careful and not make this a precedent every time something happens - we don't need them showing up a Aggie games because some Dem is in power and some idiot calls in a threat - that's all that m saying and that my option - no harm no foul bro


The be more accurate, the federal forces can be used to enforce any federal law, not only protecting federal buildings. You might notbthink it's wise but blame it on Thomas Jefferson because he signed the bill into law.
smstork1007
How long do you want to ignore this user?
usmcbrooks said:

fullback44 said:

smstork1007 said:

fullback44 said:

TAMUallen said:

fullback44 said:

To be honest this is all pretty much under control, there are a few idiots out there which will either disperse or go to jail. There is no real need for federal guard to be used now. Maybe keep a few in front of federal buildings, no other force is needed at this time. The idiots in LA now have this under control it seems


If National Guard wasn't there at the federal building then things would have gone really sour. They're absolutely still needed. Dont forget this is a fricking Tuesday and "protests" are spreading plus getting more combative


I'm fine with having them protect federal buildings that come under attack, but I'm not for using them anywhere else unless this were to get way way way more out of control. Sure have them in the area and ready to respond if the states don't do their part, however, we don't need the federal guard to be showing up when it's unneeded, that's not a good precedent to set
They are National Guard, and what you said you are fine with, is ALL they have DONE. It almost like you don't quite know what you want to talk about.


Bro- I know it's the national guard (federal forces) all I'm saying is watch out what you wish for, Trump deploying the national guard (fed forces) to other places in a city that doesn't need them could lead to other uses down the road. He can protect federal buildings and they can be held in reserve if needed in a city- but they need to be careful and not make this a precedent every time something happens - we don't need them showing up a Aggie games because some Dem is in power and some idiot calls in a threat - that's all that m saying and that my option - no harm no foul bro


They aren't being used in any capacity except for protecting Federal assets. They are not entering combat, detaining or arresting anyone at this point on time.
He either knows that and is playing obtuse, or is clueless and should probably educate himself a little more before commenting.
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Says the non ag tag guy in the political section - bro I've got a degree from A&M and contribute plenty to this school - no I'm not a military Ag either
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Broooooo. - yes non military people know that. What do you not see- I'm just saying we shouldn't use them in any capacity not needed. - it's obvious they have only been used so far to protect federal property
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fullback44 said:

Says the non ag tag guy in the political section - bro I've got a degree from A&M and contribute plenty to this school - no I'm not a military Ag either


You seem strangely off on this and it is noted though
outofstateaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who?mikejones! said:

Its not
Its been co opted, just as blm was


This is correct. The 2020 riots were never about George Floyd or racism and these riots are not about immigration or deportation. These are leftist/communist radicals dead set on bringing down the United States and Western Civilization through violent revolution.
Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Married to a Latina. She's just fine. Asleep actually. We're all good here.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.