AggieEP said:
You are insane. No one that works CT wants it to continue forever. I joined up after 9/11 for patriotic reasons and to make a difference in the world. I worked long nights away from my family hunting these guys so they couldn't harm you and you call this work "disgusting." Please look at what you write before you post.
Your work is not the part that is "disgusting". It's the fact that you parrot Palestinian propaganda ensuring that their policy of taking hostages, killing civilians (on both sides), and using them as human shields WORKS. You are doing your best to make sure that more of that happens. Whether or not you do so because of a twisted desire to cash out on unending war or because you are naive doesn't really matter. The results are the same. Hamas will continue doing what they are doing and will thank people like you, AggieEP, for doing your part in helping them achieving their goals.
Quote:
As for the question on the use of atomic weapons on Japan, there is a great book called Prompt and Utter Destruction that does a great job of discussing the legal and moral questions around the use of those weapons on civilian targets. If you want my personal opinion, I'm glad I'm not the one that had to make the call to use them. We vaporized infants and those two days are the two days with the most civilian deaths in the history of warfare. On the other hand, it ended a long and bloody war and brought our troops home without having to fight for the Japanese homeland. The weapons were also so frighteningly powerful that their use in that moment has given us 80 years without a war between states that have nuclear weapons. Basically, it's a complex issue that forces you into a moral dilemma.
Are you willing to kill innocent people, including children in order to win a war and save the lives of your own people?
That's a heavy question with deep moral implications, you obviously believe it to be a no brainer, but you should visit the museum in Hiroshima some day just to add some context on what the other side experienced that day.
It's not a complex issue. It was a no brainer. Killing 210,000 people is preferable to killing millions of people. I'm glad somebody of moral clarity, like Truman, made that decision rather than wishy washy people like yourself. If he made the opposite choice because of "feels", then he would have willingly causing the deaths of millions just so that he can sleep better so that he could pretend that he didn't actually make the decision. It would have been a disgraceful decision and Truman would have been judged as pathetic rather then wise.