Agryan00 said:
MagnumLoad said:
HE had great difficulty throwing strikes. If you can't throw strikes when you have to, and locate pitches (no control), you can't pitch. That was the problem in top 9 in game 1 MO, and then Earley not recognizing it soon enough to pull him.
Your going to judge his control off of 18.1 mostly high pressure innings. How many times did Earley throw him in with the bases loaded and no outs usually because another reliever like Frescorn, Earleys pet project that was an abomination until Hoover, made a mess of things. Yes I know Jackson caused is own issues at times but it is alot harder to throw strikes when you trying to chip edges because anything put in play scores a run.
So by that rationale, a guy gets a pass on control issues bc he had control issues in pressure situations…which arguably is the most important time to have control??
Said no baseball coach ever.
In 3rd year in a program and you throw 97 and havent established any sort of consistency or defined role…I'd say yeah it's an issue.
Would I prefer he stay? Sure bc we need arms and he throws 97 and maybe can figure it out. But to give a guy a pass on struggling to throw strikes bc he was in pressure situations is an odd take. Players typically are judged how they do in pressure situations. Mark that one up as another irrationals Earley criticism "brought pitcher into game in tough situations".
Pretty sure Schloss brought in Evan A in crappy situation after crappy situation and was lights out. Somehow it seems to be possible to throw strikes in the heat of the moment.