***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

179,765 Views | 2162 Replies | Last: 20 hrs ago by BusterAg
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Boasberg is a political partisan. He should be removed from the bench, disbarred, and financially ruined.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chutkan is also a political partisan. An anti-American hack.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


When?
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Supreme court justices gonna be hating life. Trump is gonna ruin their entire summer.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Thursday's order defers a ruling on the applications until after the newly scheduled oral arguments on May 15 meaning Trump's plan will remain blocked, for now.
LINK
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

Supreme court justices gonna be hating life. Trump is gonna ruin their entire summer.
Their own fault for inviting this kind of stuff to continue with the rulings so far instead of vigorously stomping on the judges indulging this kind of crap.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

will25u said:


When?


It's only on the motion for stay.

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3523779/last#last

I'm Gipper
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


Seems to me that something like this would be an appropriate response:

"The government has no further information regarding Mr. Garcia's disposition since we handed him over to the custody of the El Salvadoran government. Since this court is not holding a habeas corpus hearing for him and would have no jurisdiction to do so, we do not recognize the court's jurisdiction for any further pleadings in this case pursuant to recent SCOTUS determinations. Since the government believes we have properly deported the individual under the powers recognized by the SCOTUS, we have not taken, nor do we plan any further diplomatic efforts aimed at facilitating his return to the US. If his attorneys file a habeas corpus petition in the appropriate court in the district where he was last held prior to deportation, we will comply fully with the orders of that court in the matter."
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:




This is a big one. It's the one Judge Thomas has been asking/waiting for. Hopefully the rabid leftist judges have finally given him what he needs to convince a majority of the court to put a halt to it.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag87H2O said:

will25u said:




This is a big one. It's the one Judge Thomas has been asking/waiting for. Hopefully the rabid leftist judges have finally given him what he needs to convince a majority of the court to put a halt to it.
ACB and Roberts are going to be tough...I think Barrett will rule correctly but who knows about Roberts. Hopefully he's lazy and thinks this will clear their dockets of nonsense for a while.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Amy Berman Jackson is barely even capable of being called a judge, more like a fraud in a robe.

Back to Boasberg's threatening bs:

flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We are in DC hoping to crash the Easter Egg Roll on Monday. Let me know sign suggestions for an impromptu court protest and I will see if we can squeeze it in after we place a wreath at BLM plaza.

These judges are simply out of control. Abolish the judiciary.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

Amy Berman Jackson is barely even capable of being called a judge, more like a fraud in a robe.

Back to Boasberg's threatening bs:



Yup. In legalese they said, "You can't do it, Judge."

Trump will fix it.
FatZilla
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

We are in DC hoping to crash the Easter Egg Roll on Monday. Let me know sign suggestions for an impromptu court protest and I will see if we can squeeze it in after we place a wreath at BLM plaza.

These judges are simply out of control. Abolish the judiciary.


Boasberg likes to eat crayons!

Write it in big bold crayon letters and put a few backwards.
When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth!
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

To understand the procedural mechanics, Rule 42 does allow a federal judge to initiate criminal contempt proceedings and, if the Department of Justice declines to prosecute, to appoint a private attorney to do so. This occurred most notably in the controversial case of Steven Donziger, an environmental lawyer found in contempt after refusing to comply with court orders. The U.S. Attorney's Office declined to prosecute, prompting the presiding judge to appoint private counsel. Though challenged as unconstitutional under the Appointments Clause, the Second Circuit upheld the process, and the Supreme Court declined review.

Fine. The machinery exists. But what is legal is not always just, and what is possible is not always permissible in a constitutional order. Boasberg, who would preside over his own contempt proceeding after appointing his own prosecutor to target executive branch officials, embodies precisely the kind of self-referential, self-aggrandizing judicial authority the Framers warned against. The Founders knew from bitter colonial experience that a judge who acts as both adjudicator and instigator is no judge at all.
LINK

That is exactly the problem I have with Rule 42. Judge can't be both prosecutor and judge.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Branca is going off on that 4th Circuit opinion. Entertaining.

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thread


"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thread


"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump will fix it.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EVERYTHING Trump admin does is getting TROs/Injuctions. lol



"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is the kind of crap I don't understand how the judges are asserting any jurisdiction. Ok, so Trump decides to fire nearly everybody saying he can complete the legislatively mandated responsibilities without them. This should not be actionable by a court until such time as Trump actually fails to fulfill the mandated responsibilities. Until that point there is no actionable offense that has a legit judicial remedy.

If it happens, then the judge can step in and one of the possible remedies would be to require rehiring some number of employees after hearing all the evidence of what proper staffing levels should be. But until then, there is no basis in judicial procedure for the judge to just decide he or she doesn't agree with Trump's plans to staff the agency and require them to not fire anybody.

There is no line item veto for the president against the legislative branch and there is no line item supervisory power granted to the judicial branch over the executive in the absence of failure to follow the law or constitution. The law doesn't say thou shalt have X number of CFPB employees, it says you must accomplish these tasks. The judge has no business butting into the executive's decision on how best to staff accomplishing those tasks.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.