***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

176,142 Views | 2129 Replies | Last: 3 hrs ago by nortex97
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman said:


What did she know about Hilary and when did she know it?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What did she know about the Manafort prosecution? Massive Ukraine involvement there.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?



light_bulb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92 said:

Stat Monitor Repairman said:


What did she know about Hilary and when did she know it?


Her response "It wasn't me"

And the DOJ response: "no reasonable prosecutor…."
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
light_bulb said:

txags92 said:

Stat Monitor Repairman said:


What did she know about Hilary and when did she know it?


Her response "It wasn't me"

And the DOJ response: "no reasonable prosecutor…."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-just-ordered-attorney-general-041838098.html

Trump is going after these law firms, this is just posted along w the attorneys death, something's going on, wonder who is behind these attacks, this chick must have known too much ?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/former-us-attorney-jessica-aber-234747273.html
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:




Yes. Please halt the craziness.
Trump will fix it.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thread


Check out this thread at Thread Reader App. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1904180692872802790.html
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I like the comment to the top level tweet.

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hahaha.... Executive privilege?
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

I like the comment to the top level tweet.


Judge Boasberg needs to be held in contempt and put in jail until he will testify.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
akm91 said:

Hahaha.... Executive privilege?


Guessing that's either sarcasm or the Tweeter is clueless
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

will25u said:

I like the comment to the top level tweet.


Judge Boasberg needs to be held in contempt and put in jail until he will testify.
That was sarcasm.

We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BMX Bandit said:

akm91 said:

Hahaha.... Executive privilege?
Guessing that's either sarcasm or the Tweeter is clueless
It is both sad and telling that the news is so insane we don't know if this was serious.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

I like the comment to the top level tweet.



Sounds like contempt of Congress.
Trump will fix it.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DOJ goes to SCOTUS over NorCal district judge ordering thousands to be reinstated via TRO across multiple agencies.

Keep the pressure on Roberts. He'll crack eventually…because he is a weakling.

Let's see if Jim Jordan's bill at least can pass the House.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Quote:

Judge Boasberg needs to be held in contempt and put in jail until he will testify.
That was sarcasm.


Ah. Who can tell these days?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Live thread.

DOJ getting a lot of pushback it seems.

txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

Live thread.

DOJ getting a lot of pushback it seems.


Doesn't matter, they were here illegally and the president has the right to deport them for that alone.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ok, so just spitballing here, but why does some of this stuff have to happen via XO? Couldn't the Trump administration dodge some of the judges by just dissolving his XOs and having the cabinet head in charge of it order it to happen instead? Since the judges are ruling on the legality of Trump ordering the TdA members deported via XO, if he dissolves the XO, the judge's order is moot. Then DHS can issue their own orders from Kristi Noem doing the same thing, right?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92 said:

Ok, so just spitballing here, but why does some of this stuff have to happen via XO? Couldn't the Trump administration dodge some of the judges by just dissolving his XOs and having the cabinet head in charge of it order it to happen instead?
Why? Trump is THE EXECUTIVE either way. These judges have no constitutional authority to do what they're doing.This is obstruction and an attempt to delay. They know that if they delay enough, Trump's desired actions will never take place. This is not how our government was intended to function.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

txags92 said:

Ok, so just spitballing here, but why does some of this stuff have to happen via XO? Couldn't the Trump administration dodge some of the judges by just dissolving his XOs and having the cabinet head in charge of it order it to happen instead?
Why? Trump is THE EXECUTIVE either way. These judges have no constitutional authority to do what they're doing.This is obstruction and an attempt to delay. They know that if they delay enough, Trump's desired actions will never take place. This is not how our government was intended to function.
I agree with you, but I just think it would be an easy way to invalidate the rulings and stymie the attempt at lawfare without actually stopping the action. Bottom line is that I don't think it is a positive thing to enhance the power of ruling by XO, and having cabinet departments handle things within their focus is closer to what the founders intended. I understand that past actions and runaway bureaucracy have made it necessary, but I think the long term precedent set by doing it is not a positive thing.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92 said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

txags92 said:

Ok, so just spitballing here, but why does some of this stuff have to happen via XO? Couldn't the Trump administration dodge some of the judges by just dissolving his XOs and having the cabinet head in charge of it order it to happen instead?
Why? Trump is THE EXECUTIVE either way. These judges have no constitutional authority to do what they're doing.This is obstruction and an attempt to delay. They know that if they delay enough, Trump's desired actions will never take place. This is not how our government was intended to function.
I agree with you, but I just think it would be an easy way to invalidate the rulings and stymie the attempt at lawfare without actually stopping the action.
I wish you were right. These judges are leftists. They will obstruct the will of the voters regardless. The left is lawless.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txags92 said:

Ok, so just spitballing here, but why does some of this stuff have to happen via XO? Couldn't the Trump administration dodge some of the judges by just dissolving his XOs and having the cabinet head in charge of it order it to happen instead? Since the judges are ruling on the legality of Trump ordering the TdA members deported via XO, if he dissolves the XO, the judge's order is moot. Then DHS can issue their own orders from Kristi Noem doing the same thing, right?
It would be cluster ****y stupid if Trump's subordinate is able to perform this action, but her boss is not.



But, in Opposite World, where we and the judges live now, it makes perfect sense.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?



will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good. Put that judge in his place. We know the game he's trying to play.
Trump will fix it.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.