***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

176,231 Views | 2129 Replies | Last: 7 hrs ago by nortex97
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:47p, 5/28/25
AG
Geeze.
Reply Quote
2
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:28p, 5/28/25
AG
A different kind of court:

Pro College Station Convention Center
Reply Quote
Stat Monitor Repairman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:34p, 5/28/25
Trump got these judges jonesing for a Trump case.

The Birkin bag of mommy jurisprudence.

The ultimate status symbol, and every judge wants one.
Reply Quote
1
ttha_aggie_09
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:06p, 5/28/25
AG
Where the hell is the Supreme Court to tell all of these courts to EAD?
Reply Quote
6
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to techno-ag • 9:51p, 5/28/25
AG
techno-ag said:
A different kind of court:

Well, I guess they can send their army to force the US to stop charging the tariffs. Members who wish to abide by the court's decision are welcome to stop sending products to the US for sale until the US complies with the ruling.
Reply Quote
4
Correction
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ttha_aggie_09 • 9:59p, 5/28/25
ttha_aggie_09 said:
Where the hell is the Supreme Court to tell all of these courts to EAD?
SCOTUS probably isn't going to tell the US Court of International Trade to "eat a dick" given that it's the exact venue where litigation concerning customs laws is supposed to be filed.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
ttha_aggie_09
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Correction • 10:06p, 5/28/25
AG
Wanna bet?
Reply Quote
4
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:09a, 5/30/25
AG
Friggin' lovebird's favorite FISC judge Rudy Contreras, still doing the bidding of foreign powers from his courtroom.

Rogue lower court judges, Russian collusion-gate called out at WH.

Reply Quote
5
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:54a, 5/30/25
The Supreme Court just stayed a lower court order that blocked the Trump administration from deporting roughly 500,000 migrants from Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. The decision is a near-term victory for President Donald Trump as he moves to crack down on border security and immigration priorities in his second term.

The Supreme Court decision stays, for now, a lower court ruling that halted Trump's plans to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) protections for some migrants living in the U.S., which allows individuals to live and work in the U.S. legally if they cannot work safely in their home country due to a disaster, armed conflict or other "extraordinary and temporary conditions."
“ How you fellas doin? We about to have us a little screw party in this red Prius over here if you wanna join us.”
Reply Quote
9
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Dirty_Mike&the_boys • 9:57a, 5/30/25
AG
Great to see.
Reply Quote
9
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 11:16a, 5/30/25
AG
MOAR!
Pro College Station Convention Center
Reply Quote
4
Stat Monitor Repairman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:18a, 5/30/25
Quote:
Liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson fumed about the decision.
Reply Quote
4
BigRobSA
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Dirty_Mike&the_boys • 11:19a, 5/30/25
Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:
The Supreme Court decision stays, for now, a lower court ruling that halted Trump's plans to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) protections for some migrants living in the U.S., which allows individuals to live and work in the U.S. legally if they cannot work safely in their home country due to a disaster, armed conflict or other "extraordinary and temporary conditions."
An actual "TPS report"? I hope he put a coverpage on it.



Reply Quote
2
samurai_science
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ttha_aggie_09 • 11:42a, 5/30/25
ttha_aggie_09 said:
Where the hell is the Supreme Court to tell all of these courts to EAD?
Its a slow process, but it will happen (and has in a few cases).
Reply Quote
3
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to samurai_science • 4:50p, 5/30/25
AG
At least two of the 'justices' (KBJ and Sotomayor) are entirely oblivious (at best) to the burden of proof, or legal posture of the parties/case, and are entirely blinded by their partisan motives.

No, the government doesn't bear any such burden referenced. This is legally idiotic, at best, and more likely an example of reasoning via feelings, not the law or jurisprudence.
Reply Quote
7
Aggie Jurist
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 6:17p, 5/30/25
AG
KBJ and the wise Latina are not serious jurists. Then again, neither is 1/3 of the judiciary. Thanks Biden(auto pen)/Durbin.
Reply Quote
9
Cougar11
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggie Jurist • 6:25p, 5/30/25
Aggie Jurist said:
KBJ and the wise Latina are not serious jurists. Then again, neither is 1/3 of the judiciary. Thanks Biden(auto pen)/Durbin.
There are two brain dead dei women on the SC its a joke.
Reply Quote
16
Deerdude
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:27p, 5/30/25
Nailed it. Exactly why DEI in law school is not working
Reply Quote
5
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:14p, 6/2/25
Reply Quote
3
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:39p, 6/2/25
Reply Quote
10
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 3:59p, 6/2/25
AG
Finally. Been waiting on that one, which has always seemed obvious.

For others (I am sure Will is aware), the standard for equal protection challenges as to a state actor are much higher to defend against. I don't expect SCOTUS (other than the 3 communist justices) would view trans-athletes in womens sports under a rational basis test.
Reply Quote
7
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:38p, 6/2/25


It's RigGEd!!!

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
3
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 7:40p, 6/2/25
AG
You know that will NOW be the claim by the left for sure.

Will a liberal judge in Hawaii issue an injunction saying the DC court cannot have this?
Reply Quote
5
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 9:14p, 6/2/25
AG
We may throw the dice, but the LORD determines how they fall.

Proverbs 16:33 (NLT)
Pro College Station Convention Center
Reply Quote
5
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:01p, 6/3/25
Reply Quote
1
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 1:08p, 6/3/25
AG
will25u said:
Libs believe Jeffrey Dahmer should be allowed to serve in the military, be allowed to oversee disposal of nuclear waste, teach your kids and tell America how to be healthy. So this is not surprising.
Reply Quote
6
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:32a, 6/4/25
Reply Quote
5
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 8:44a, 6/4/25
AG
LOL. Dems don't want to follow the law when their guy is not in power.
Pro College Station Convention Center
Reply Quote
3
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:22a, 6/5/25
AG

It's unsurprising.

Standing and jurisdiction, just two things that don't matter when the priority is 'stop Trump.'

Reply Quote
5
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:38a, 6/5/25
AG
Not really a Trump battle, or new jurisprudence, but nice to see a unanimous opinion on this.
Reply Quote
6
Stat Monitor Repairman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:46p, 6/9/25
Reply Quote
4
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:28p, 6/9/25
Reply Quote
2
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 10:56p, 6/9/25
AG
will25u said:
Cool. Newsome doesn't understand that the POTUS is the commander in chief of all of the National Guard which is able to nationalize the STATE guard.

Well, at least he's going to get a lesson in how the government works.

Maybe he can read the court decision at the French Laundry...
Reply Quote
6
Aggie Jurist
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag with kids • 4:20a, 6/10/25
AG
Quote:
Cool. Newsome doesn't understand that the POTUS is the commander in chief of all of the National Guard which is able to nationalize the STATE guard.

Well, at least he's going to get a lesson in how the government works.
He doesn't care - the suit is just virtue signaling. He's hoping another District Court "activist in a robe" care's little about their reputation and issues an order that the 9th Circuit will quickly enjoin.

This is the one situation where the Trump administration might actually refuse to follow a court order - as the courts have zero authority here.
Reply Quote
6
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:48a, 6/10/25
Reply Quote
1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.