***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

224,506 Views | 2496 Replies | Last: 5 hrs ago by aggiehawg
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:32a, 7/11/25
Reply Quote
techno-ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 11:34a, 7/11/25
will25u said:


Another W for all those alternative viewpoints that struggled to break through the noise a few years ago.

Pro College Station Convention Center
Reply Quote
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to techno-ag • 11:35a, 7/11/25
Quote:
All they're doing now is desperately trying to tap the brakes. This is inevitable and they know it. Thus the egregious rulings.
They want to drag everything out in hopes of getting a marxist congress to reverse things.
Reply Quote
Stat Monitor Repairman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:38a, 7/11/25
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:46p, 7/11/25
Thread. Sua Sponte appeals court.

Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:12p, 7/11/25
Thread

Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:22p, 7/11/25

Reply Quote
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:15a, 7/12/25
Why hasn't the House judiciary announced impeachment proceedings this week????
Reply Quote
techno-ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 8:16a, 7/12/25
nortex97 said:
Why hasn't the House judiciary announced impeachment proceedings this week????


Quote:
A communist judge in LA has ordered ICE to report directly to her and radical left NGOs - not the president.

That isn't going to happen.
Pro College Station Convention Center
Reply Quote
BTHOB
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to techno-ag • 12:54p, 7/12/25
techno-ag said:
nortex97 said:
Why hasn't the House judiciary announced impeachment proceedings this week????


Quote:
A communist judge in LA has ordered ICE to report directly to her and radical left NGOs - not the president.

That isn't going to happen.


You know what else isn't going to happen? Accountability for these over-reaching judges.
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:24p, 7/12/25
Democrats nuking confirmation process is what made all this possible.

Each party in majority can essentially appoint anyone they want with no moderating to get to 60 votes.

Only way to fight it is to appoint constitutionalists only. No moderates.
Reply Quote
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 7:38a, 7/13/25
I'll just note again it is time to begin at least 5 impeachment articles vs. sitting federal Biden/Obama judges.

Oh, and notice TWENTY communist states now are worried about the federal government sharing database information between executive branch agencies as to fraud by illegal aliens they have long claimed doesn't exist, so they have filed litigation after forum shopping with Vince Chhabria in Northern California (another radical Obama judge from Berkeley law/San Francisco) to stop this horror from happening. Another communist Collins/Murk approved of (and even Lamar Alexander). Even Flake and McCain voted against him!

Never, ever vote for a Democrat. I think Margot is right, though, as to the longer-term game the Democrat-communists are playing being a losing one for them. The lawfare/pro-illegal aliens policies and violence will just empower Homan/more deportations, ultimately, even if they get more short-term propaganda wins from communists in judicial robes at the TC level.

Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:49p, 7/13/25
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:08a, 7/14/25

Reply Quote
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 9:12a, 7/14/25
Yep, LOL @ that last sentence. Filing. This should be another easy win. Communist judges are just going to get tired of losing their asses over the next 6 months me think.
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:34a, 7/14/25
Reply Quote
We fixed the keg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 12:44p, 7/14/25
Quote:
... and let Jackson submit her dissent later.

Reply Quote
1 edit
txags92
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to We fixed the keg • 1:08p, 7/14/25
We fixed the keg said:
Quote:
... and let Jackson submit her dissent later.


Is she still coloring in the exhibits? Or did Roberts hide her crayons?
Reply Quote
We fixed the keg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to txags92 • 1:10p, 7/14/25
Quote:
Is she still coloring in the exhibits? Or did Roberts hide her crayons?

I can't answer that,'I am not an artist."
Reply Quote
LMCane
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 1:12p, 7/14/25
Biden's money supply from his corruption train must be running out.

never heard of that law firm and we deal with all the best firms in DC.
Reply Quote
SupaManu
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to LMCane • 1:51p, 7/14/25
LMCane said:
Biden's money supply from his corruption train must be running out.

never heard of that law firm and we deal with all the best firms in DC.

I think its the fact that she's married to the judge presiding over some of the cases
Reply Quote
Aggie Jurist
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to LMCane • 1:51p, 7/14/25
She's got plenty of chops.
Reply Quote
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to LMCane • 1:58p, 7/14/25
LMCane said:
Biden's money supply from his corruption train must be running out.

never heard of that law firm and we deal with all the best firms in DC.

Looks like there are some heavy hitters you don't know about.

They aren't paying these kinds of salaries with low rates to Clients! lol

Quote:
[color=#222222][size=4][font=Lora, serif]Think the Cravath salary scale for associates is generous? Then feast your eyes upon the salary scale that's being offered by Kaplan Hecker & Fink, a firm that's been around for less than a decade but consistently punches above its weight when it comes to compensation.[/font][/size][/color]

https://abovethelaw.com/2022/03/kaplan-hecker-raise-2022/


(By the way, the "Kaplan" was Robert Kaplan, E. Jean Carroll attorney who left because she was a Giant B)

https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/news/international/roberta-kaplan-departs-kaplan-hecker-fink-amid-controversy-to-launch-new-firm/387273

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:35p, 7/14/25

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ThunderCougarFalconBird • 2:36p, 7/14/25
ThunderCougarFalconBird said:
Im Gipper said:
ThunderCougarFalconBird said:
So they've pretty much lost Kagan with the lawfare nonsense and now it looks like Sotomayor may be slipping away as well. Wow.


Don't hold your breath on that. For either.
Kagan yes, sotomayor no. I think Roberts "legitimacy of the court" rhetoric/rulings have rubbed off on ACB 100% and they're working on Kagan (who Scalia said to give her the job because she's smart).


Ahem.

Those two are still going to go left 95 and 99 times out of 100!

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:14p, 7/14/25
Thread.

Reply Quote
1 edit
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:21p, 7/14/25
This is what liberals will not listen to.

They only say that Trump has been injuncted 488399387 times. Even if they are all bunk.

Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:53p, 7/14/25
Reply Quote
ThunderCougarFalconBird
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to txags92 • 8:54p, 7/14/25
txags92 said:
We fixed the keg said:
Quote:
... and let Jackson submit her dissent later.


Is she still coloring in the exhibits? Or did Roberts hide her crayons?
they got her some circles of paper and safety pencils.
Reply Quote
Mathguy64
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 9:14p, 7/14/25
will25u said:

So the same judge that said "ICE now reports to me" now wants the lawyers to tell her whether they think her decision can be appealed?

What does she think they will say?

Govt: "Lady you do know the Buck doesnt stop with you right?"

Plaintiff: "You got this! Go girl!"

In what world does she think she is the ultimate authority here?
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:53p, 7/14/25
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
techno-ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 7:15a, 7/15/25
will25u said:

They shower him with useless lawsuits but the constitution is his umbrella.
Pro College Station Convention Center
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:02a, 7/16/25
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 9:16a, 7/16/25
will25u said:


Shocker
“ How you fellas doin? We about to have us a little screw party in this red Prius over here if you wanna join us.”
Reply Quote
Deerdude
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:32a, 7/16/25
If they admittedly bias, how can they remain judges?
Reply Quote
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.