***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

177,957 Views | 2141 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by FTAG 2000
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:06p, 3/29/25
Reply Quote
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:19p, 3/29/25
“ How you fellas doin? We about to have us a little screw party in this red Prius over here if you wanna join us.”
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:47p, 3/29/25
Seems like a better idea, but a few districts would still pump them out.

Reply Quote
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:00a, 3/30/25
In hilarious move, Trump files preliminary motion to set aside last minute 5-year Biden collective bargaining deals with federal unions, a few minutes after signing the EO, in…Waco, TX.

Quote:
The Department of Justice issued a press release declaring: "The plaintiff agencies have collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) with the defendants, which are locals, councils, and Division 10 of the American Federation of Government Employees; those CBAs prevent the plaintiffs from implementing workforce policies that would help them further their national security missions. The plaintiff agencies therefore wish to terminate their CBAs. But to avoid unnecessary labor strife and to ensure legal certainty, they filed this declaratory judgment action to confirm that they are legally entitled to do so."

"We are taking this fight directly to the public-sector unions," said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. "By affirmatively suing in Texas, we are aggressively protecting President Trump's efforts to ensure unions no longer interfere in the national security functions of the government."

The lawsuit makes special mention of the last-minute collective bargaining agreements signed by several agencies with a five-year term that seemed to have no purpose other than to stymie actions President Trump had announced he would take, like ordering federal workers back to the office, before he was inaugurated.

What makes this case so interesting is that the suit was filed on behalf of the Departments of Defense, Agriculture, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Justice, Veterans Affairs, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Social Security Administration in the single-judge Waco Division of the Western District of Texas. It was also filed minutes after President Trump issued his union-busting executive order.
Reply Quote
Ag with kids
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 11:32a, 3/30/25
will25u said:
What's interesting is that the district court thinks it has nationwide jurisdiction, while the appeals court rightly knows their jurisdiction has been strictly defined and their rulings only apply there.

Which is why this other case wasn't thrown out - the DC Circuit stay didn't apply in Seattle.

Apparently, district court judges are now the most powerful people in the country...
Reply Quote
1 edit
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:09p, 3/30/25
Reply Quote
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 6:09p, 3/30/25
Won't get passed without filibuster rule changes, at least.
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:30p, 3/30/25
Shot:

Chaser:
Reply Quote
BusterAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 6:46p, 3/30/25
Im Gipper said:
BusterAg said:
TAM85 said:
It would make sense to consolidate all the cases against Trump's EO into a single district court, perhaps in the Eastern District of Texas in Marshall. And if any of the cases go beyond the TRO/TI stage, pick a jury and try it in Marshall.


Waco would be better these days. But, I like where your mind is.



Waco? Trump filing a patent case? Lol


There is one place and one place only to file:

AMARILLO


Um, apparently someone on Pam Bondi's team follows me on Texags.
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:11p, 3/31/25


Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:12p, 3/31/25


Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:38p, 3/31/25
Won't pass Senate, but would neuter district judges from nationwide injunctions.

Reply Quote
1 edit
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:59p, 3/31/25
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:35p, 3/31/25
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:34p, 3/31/25
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:38p, 3/31/25
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:15p, 3/31/25

Reply Quote
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 5:26a, 4/1/25
will25u said:
This one is pure BS even by 9th circuit prior holding.

Oh btw, his nomination/confirmation was heavily supported by the CCP.

FJB, and all democrats (every senator, btw) who voted for this treasonous pos.
And, just another Boasberg idiotic ruling.
Reply Quote
GenericAggie
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:23a, 4/1/25
The 9th circuit. LOL.
Reply Quote
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:44a, 4/1/25
Boasberg is sick in the head. He truly thinks he is in charge of the country.
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:37a, 4/1/25
Really good line of questioning here by Kennedy.

Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:48a, 4/1/25
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:29a, 4/1/25
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:49a, 4/1/25
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:01p, 4/1/25

Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:13p, 4/1/25
Reply Quote
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 12:14p, 4/1/25
Maybe he will find time to subpoena Ray Epps.

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:55p, 4/1/25
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:03p, 4/1/25

Reply Quote
Ag with kids
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 5:10p, 4/1/25
will25u said:

Why does the appeals court have no jurisdiction but the district court does?

Shouldn't the superior court have a greater jurisdiction than the district court?
Reply Quote
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag with kids • 5:18p, 4/1/25
Quote:
Why does the appeals court have no jurisdiction but the district court does?

Shouldn't the superior court have a greater jurisdiction than the district court?
Procedurally, a TRO expires by its own terms. In that respect, not considered a final order from which an appeal can occur.

But I share your frustration with the loosey goosely manner of which court has jurisdiction and which do not. Maddening. A very tiny fig leaf for what is essentially judicial obstruction.
Reply Quote
txags92
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ag with kids • 5:32p, 4/1/25
Ag with kids said:
will25u said:

Why does the appeals court have no jurisdiction but the district court does?

Shouldn't the superior court have a greater jurisdiction than the district court?
I would love to see them make TROs only available to plaintiffs who are before the court. If they want a nationwide injunction, they either need to get a class action certified so they can speak for a larger group or go ahead and go through full hearing to adjudicate a PI.
Reply Quote
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to txags92 • 5:50p, 4/1/25
Quote:
I would love to see them make TROs only available to plaintiffs who are before the court. If they want a nationwide injunction, they either need to get a class action certified so they can speak for a larger group or go ahead and go through full hearing to adjudicate a PI.
They are currently only applicable to the parties before them. And certifying a class action also is supposed to follow a set procedure.

None of the federal rules of civil procedures are being adhered to by these courts. Why I term it as judicial obstruction. Under the rules, courts can delay all they want from issuing a decision and opinion after a hearing/trial. (Witness Judge Totenberg issuing her ridiculous ruling from a 17 day trial before in January OF LAST YEAR!)

But what is happening now is a vast contortion of the laws that are binding upon them. Nor do they GAS.
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:04p, 4/1/25

Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:20p, 4/1/25
Reply Quote
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.