***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

176,335 Views | 2129 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by nortex97
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No doubt about it. That's why we need to slam their phone lines.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The SC is going to have to stop this *****
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

Is everyone ready for Boasberg to pick the DC USA? Maybe Norm Eisen?

Thx a lot Cornyn. You're doing a great job for us.
Cornyn is crazy if he doesn't get on board quickly. This would be the nail in his coffin politcally if he doesn't vote to approve. He damages his chance at winning another term every minute he waits.

Then again, he may already suspect he is toast and either just flat doesn't care, or he is playing to RINOs and Democrats in trying to put together a majority two party coalition just like Burrows did in the Speaker's race.

He cannot be run out of DC quickly enough in my book.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Certifying a class in a habeas action where none of the petitioners are physically present in the district is a legal version of the Ship of Theseus.

You can only change a thing so much until it isn't that thing anymore.

And thats the case with this habeas deal. They making it up as they go along.
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why does everyone think that bozoberg gets to pick the DC USA if Trump's nominee isn't confirmed?
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ThunderCougarFalconBird said:

Why does everyone think that bozoberg gets to pick the DC USA if Trump's nominee isn't confirmed?
Because the acting USA is limited to serve for 120 days without a confirmed appt. After that, the chief judge of the DC district is tasked with naming somebody until an appt is confirmed. Boasberg is the chief judge for the DC courts.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thom Tillis is going to block Ed Martin from even getting a floor vote…over J6. Seriously, Trump needs to savage this guy and find a primary opponent.

nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seattle Biden judge Jamaal Whitehead orders refugees to be admitted again, despite February 9th circuit order over-ruling him.
Quote:

The plaintiffs involved in this garbage lawsuit include the International Refugee Assistance Project, the Jewish refugee resettlement agency HIAS, Lutheran Community Services Northwest, and individual refugees and family members. They claimed that unless Trump's order were reversed, they would have great difficulty providing services to refugees.
Trump lawyers, though, have rightfully pointed out that the president had explicit constitutional authority to deny entry to foreign nationals who, if allowed into the country, "would be detrimental to the interests of the United States."
In January, President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14155, titled "Realigning the United States Refugee Admissions Program," which suspended the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) effective January 27, 2025.
This order stopped refugees from entering America and barred federal funding to organizations assisting refugees, including those already in the country. The suspension will remain in effect until a determination is made that resuming the program is aligned with U.S. interests.
Again, more USAID NGO allies trying to run US foreign policy through the judiciary still. This will also be overturned. Whitehead is KBJ weapons-grade stupid.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


If they are going to certify them as a class, then if Trump wins, the administrations shouldn't have to have individual habeas hearing for them, right? They're all bound by the class judgement.

Can't have it both ways - prevent immediate deportation as a class then need individual hearings later on. You're either a class or not a class.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

Seattle Biden judge Jamaal Whitehead orders refugees to be admitted again, despite February 9th circuit order over-ruling him.
Quote:

The plaintiffs involved in this garbage lawsuit include the International Refugee Assistance Project, the Jewish refugee resettlement agency HIAS, Lutheran Community Services Northwest, and individual refugees and family members. They claimed that unless Trump's order were reversed, they would have great difficulty providing services to refugees.
Trump lawyers, though, have rightfully pointed out that the president had explicit constitutional authority to deny entry to foreign nationals who, if allowed into the country, "would be detrimental to the interests of the United States."
In January, President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14155, titled "Realigning the United States Refugee Admissions Program," which suspended the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) effective January 27, 2025.
This order stopped refugees from entering America and barred federal funding to organizations assisting refugees, including those already in the country. The suspension will remain in effect until a determination is made that resuming the program is aligned with U.S. interests.
Again, more USAID NGO allies trying to run US foreign policy through the judiciary still. This will also be overturned. Whitehead is KBJ weapons-grade stupid.
Let them in and drop them all off in Seattle.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm reading some stuff this am (The Hill and elsewhere) that makes me think the senate will just give up on getting Ed Martin out of committee, let alone to a floor vote before the 20th, and the FBI has decided not to even complete the background check now as he will wind up having to withdraw.

Very frustrating but it is where we are at.



Anyway, I should probably shut down posting on this for the day before I violate TOS. Effing Thune and Tillis.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The swamp is a real place.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There may be 46 open judge positions, but Trump did not even appoint any judges until last week.

Getting those scheduled for hearings is on Grassley and the judiciary committee, not Thune.

Thune can and MUST get the Ed Martin confirmation set for hearing before the full Senate. Even if they can't push him through, make those who are against him put their name in the "nay" column!

I'm Gipper
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have contacted Cornyn and Thom Tillis.

Tired of the bull*****
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Notice Boasberg acting as a party, not a judge here, in the American manner (common law) he is 'ordinarily' supposed to behave. He fashions himself as an inquisitor, not a dispassionate justice. Again, impeachment is highly appropriate.

He's as sanctimoniously disingenuous as this hag:

Judges arrogating themselves not just jurisdiction, but judicial roles/powers where it doesn't exist is…unamerican at best and at worst a violation of the judicial code of conduct and their oaths.

More ludicrous lawfare; appellate court holds that ICE has to bring 'doctoral student' back from Louisiana to Vermont pending her habeas case. Her student visa has been revoked and a final order of removal is pending. She can say whatever she wants about Israel/Hamas once sent home.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:


More ludicrous lawfare; appellate court holds that ICE has to bring 'doctoral student' back from Louisiana to Vermont pending her habeas case. Her student visa has been revoked and a final order of removal is pending. She can say whatever she wants about Israel/Hamas once sent home.

So, apparently if you file habeas in the wrong jurisdiction, they can just require you to be moved to that jurisdiction?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

So, apparently if you file habeas in the wrong jurisdiction, they can just require you to be moved to that jurisdiction?
A few months ago, I'd have laughed this off and mocked someone asserting something like that as an imbecile. But, here we are.

That's not the way it's supposed to work, no. I mean, even a month ago SCOTUS made this clear.
Quote:

After she was arrested, Ozturk was transported to Methuen, Massachusetts, then Lebanon, New Hampshire, followed by St. Albans, Vermont, where she was kept overnight. On the morning of March 26, in Burlington, Vermont, Ozturk was put on a plane and flown to Louisiana, where she is currently in custody at an immigration facility in Basile.

Ozturk's lawyers filed a petition challenging her arrest and detention as a violation of the First and Fifth Amendments in federal district court in Massachusetts. But the case was transferred to the U.S. district court in Vermont after it was determined that Ozturk was detained in that state at the time the petition was filed.

The Justice Department sought to dismiss Ozturk's petition, claiming the district court in Vermont lacks jurisdiction since Ozturk is confined in Louisiana. But Ozturk's lawyers asked U.S. District Judge William Sessions to order her to be released or transferred to Vermont while her claims are adjudicated. Sessions last month ruled that Ozturk had to be transferred to ICE custody in Vermont by May 1. He also set a bail hearing for May 9, with Ozturk appearing in person, and will consider the merits of her habeas petition on May 22.

The 2nd Circuit then temporarily halted Sessions' order while it considered the Trump administration's emergency appeal.

The judges said that Ozturk's constitutional challenge to her detention can move forward, even amid a potential challenge to deportation from the U.S., which would arise after an order of removal has been entered by an immigration judge and affirmed by the Board of Immigration Appeals.

"She asserts that the government arrested and detained her to prevent speech with which it disagrees. Such an act would be a violation of the Constitution quite separate from the removal procedures followed by the immigration courts," they wrote.
They cite Ex parte Endo from 1944 as a rationale that it was properly transferred to Vermont (because her poor lawyers didn't know where she was for 24 hours), and then go on that the government 'technically did nothing wrong' in the transfer of the inmate to Louisiana, but claim they still have the proper right to get her back to commie land judges based on the filing date/time.

The opinion drips with disdain for the government and sympathy for her. Not sure if this one is worth the gov't appealing to SCOTUS or not, it could be worth letting Obama-judge William K Sessions III (snobby elitist yankee perhaps?) issue a final ruling (as we all know he wants to do) that is easy to crush.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
To protect separation of powers, the Executive Branch must appeal. This court does not have the jurisdiction or power to MAKE the Executive do this.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pirro? LOL.

Tillis is a feckless moron of a pawn, fwiw. He doesn't even know the game he's engaged in, let alone how to win.
TxAgLaw03RW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fox is now reporting this is confirmed.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Judge Jeanine has some axes to grind. This could be epic.

Popcorn in the kettle, heat turned on. LFG.

Excellent move by Trump!
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My question is why/how would this be a 'win'?

Even accepting arguendo that Boasberg would agree to it, she's a blow hard, period with no demonstrable record of getting anything done leading a team of attorneys.

We seem to be reading the headlines without really knowing the underlying script, imho.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pirro? Uhm, no.
Aggie Jurist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
eh, it's a political position. Trump is trying to teach someone a lesson - and I'm OK with it.

As for the "Boasberg won't approve" note above - Boesberg doesn't have anything to say about this - at least for 120 days.
jt2hunt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Pirro? Uhm, no.

He did!
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ouch. Admittedly a lot of her legal experience was politically oriented but she's has been a pretty big champion of helping women regarding domestic abuse cases.

It's a fun experiment for him to put her as interim.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I guess. It's amusing, in any case.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?



Dems just keep walking right into it.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh man, he'd have really helped DC, but I like him much better in this role too.

Bring it on.
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Pirro? Uhm, no.


Im not a fan of her, but have to admit this is a hilarious move my Trump!

Don't like Martin? Well how about these apples!!!'??

I'm Gipper
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump keeps knocking it outta the park.
Trump will fix it.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Exactly. He's teabagging them. And this will give them something to whine about.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.