And yet, they haven't.Quote:
That's part of the complaint. The local response should be able to handle it.
Correct.torrid said:But seemed disinclined to do so.The Chair said:
The local response should be able to handle it.
But they didn't. They left the ICE agents to fend for themselves, so the feds brought in the NatGuard to defend the fed facilities. All the other action has been foreigners and anarchists attacking local and state police and looting and vandalizing non-federal facilities because the local and state police still can't get the situation under control by themselves.The Chair said:
Except that it really has been very localized the entire time. It is not widespread like 2020 or Rodney King or anything like that. That's never really been up for debate.
That's part of the complaint. The local response should be able to handle it.
AlaskanAg99 said:
Local and State politicians are encouraging this. Specifically rioting around and against Federal buildings/staff. So Trump brought in resources to protect Federal assets and that's where things went sideways as the lefts message was NG troops were part of the active effort to out down the "protests".
Inflammative language and messaging to rile people up more.
What's funny is I don't recall this response when Obama departed 5,000,000 people. Which tells you all you need to know is this entire event, and others nationwide, is Dem propaganda.
But the local response refused to handle it initially, things got out of control, and local and federal law enforcment were needlessly put in harms way.The Chair said:
Except that it really has been very localized the entire time. It is not widespread like 2020 or Rodney King or anything like that. That's never really been up for debate.
That's part of the complaint. The local response should be able to handle it.
samurai_science said:AlaskanAg99 said:
Local and State politicians are encouraging this. Specifically rioting around and against Federal buildings/staff. So Trump brought in resources to protect Federal assets and that's where things went sideways as the lefts message was NG troops were part of the active effort to out down the "protests".
Inflammative language and messaging to rile people up more.
What's funny is I don't recall this response when Obama departed 5,000,000 people. Which tells you all you need to know is this entire event, and others nationwide, is Dem propaganda.
That message from the Democrats has failed because the voters want law and order.
Ag87H2O said:But the local response refused to handle it initially, things got out of control, and local and federal law enforcment were needlessly put in harms way.The Chair said:
Except that it really has been very localized the entire time. It is not widespread like 2020 or Rodney King or anything like that. That's never really been up for debate.
That's part of the complaint. The local response should be able to handle it.
Posts like this that try to minimize the seriousness of the insurrectionists actions are how you know it's not going well for their Marxists handlers that are coordinating their actions.
That really is the issue and straight from the Dem playbook. They always try to minimize criminal activity in a way that justifies it. "Mostly peaceful" (instead of violent) and other code words like "undocumented immigrants" (instead of illegal aliens).Ag87H2O said:But the local response refused to handle it initially, things got out of control, and local and federal law enforcment were needlessly put in harms way.The Chair said:
Except that it really has been very localized the entire time. It is not widespread like 2020 or Rodney King or anything like that. That's never really been up for debate.
That's part of the complaint. The local response should be able to handle it.
Posts like this that try to minimize the seriousness of the insurrectionists actions are how you know it's not going well for their Marxists handlers that are coordinating their actions.
samurai_science said:
The new LA district attorney appears to be not willing to let the criminals get away with the violence this time
I am not trying to minimize the seriousness of anything. I was responding to a poster and posters who somehow think that this is widespread. It was never widespread which is the damning thing for the mayor amd governor. They should have easily handled it on their own but refused to. And Trump had to act, correctly, before it got out of control.Ag87H2O said:But the local response refused to handle it initially, things got out of control, and local and federal law enforcment were needlessly put in harms way.The Chair said:
Except that it really has been very localized the entire time. It is not widespread like 2020 or Rodney King or anything like that. That's never really been up for debate.
That's part of the complaint. The local response should be able to handle it.
Posts like this that try to minimize the seriousness of the insurrectionists actions are how you know it's not going well for their Marxists handlers that are coordinating their actions.
1. I've been living in California for almost 10 years and have had a good opportunity to look around, so much so that we moved from blue to red county to mitigate the presence of the crazy, violent, and indolent whose daily lives seem to primarily focus on interfering with everyone else going about theirs.Gig em G said:
I'm just saying....look around you. Most people aren't crazy idiots burning American flags, causing violence and destroying sh**. They are going about their lives.
The fed government and Palantir would rather you be scared so they can justify the Patriot Act 2.0 bill and "conservatives" will support it
Thread activity on texags, reddit, foxnews comment sections, facebook, your text group, etc don't create reality.LMCane said:AtticusMatlock said:
I've been following traffic patterns on Google Maps. Basically just a few streets around the federal area downtown. Everything else is open with no one blocking roads or anything.
34 pages of posts in this thread
1154 individual posts in this thread
"but really believe me it's just a few streets!! I can see it on Google maps!!"
So, how much rioting and looting are acceptable and allowable?Gig em G said:
The overwhelming majority of LA is fine…and only a fraction are rioting and looting. The media always love to fearmonger
https://www.youtube.com/live/3LXQWU67Ufk?si=FSJqVu6ys_fK_pHN
Buddy was with 3/7 Weapons his last deployment to Iraq 2008-09. He still lives in Cali for some strange reason even after retiring back in 2014.Eliminatus said:
How it be:
On a serious note though, my thoughts are definitely with 2/7, the USMC infantry bubbas called out to be attacked later. It's my old unit and though I have no doubt they will conduct themselves as consummate professionals, I am wary of the protestors and whatever bad actors may be seeded throughout.
Dad-O-Lot said:So, how much rioting and looting are acceptable and allowable?Gig em G said:
The overwhelming majority of LA is fine…and only a fraction are rioting and looting. The media always love to fearmonger
https://www.youtube.com/live/3LXQWU67Ufk?si=FSJqVu6ys_fK_pHN
At what point SHOULD law enforcement get involved?
Is "some" rioting OK as long as there are 10x more people being peaceful?
Is say, 1 burning car per 1000 "peaceful protestors" an acceptable ratio?
What are the acceptable levels of assaults on LEO and burning cars and shutting down highways and looting?The Chair said:
Except that it really has been very localized the entire time. It is not widespread like 2020 or Rodney King or anything like that. That's never really been up for debate.
That's part of the complaint. The local response should be able to handle it.
will25u said:
Grain of salt and all that...🚨BREAKING: News Leaks suggest rioters in Los Angeles are planning to attack the 500 Marines tonight in a 5th night of violence
— The Patriot Oasis™ (@ThePatriotOasis) June 10, 2025
fc2112 said:What are the acceptable levels of assaults on LEO and burning cars and shutting down highways and looting?The Chair said:
Except that it really has been very localized the entire time. It is not widespread like 2020 or Rodney King or anything like that. That's never really been up for debate.
That's part of the complaint. The local response should be able to handle it.
Reminds me of JD Vance's response to that idiot lib Raddatz:Dad-O-Lot said:So, how much rioting and looting are acceptable and allowable?Gig em G said:
The overwhelming majority of LA is fine…and only a fraction are rioting and looting. The media always love to fearmonger
https://www.youtube.com/live/3LXQWU67Ufk?si=FSJqVu6ys_fK_pHN
At what point SHOULD law enforcement get involved?
Is "some" rioting OK as long as there are 10x more people being peaceful?
Is say, 1 burning car per 1000 "peaceful protestors" an acceptable ratio?
Quote:
Sen. JD Vance responded to criticism of Donald Trump's comments about the Venezuelan "Tren de Aragua" gang in Aurora, Colorado, during an interview with Martha Raddatz, Sunday morning on ABC's "This Week."
"Do you support Donald Trump making those claims that the Republican mayor says were grossly exaggerated and have hurt the city's identity and sense of safety?" Raddatz asked. "The incidents were limited to a handful of apartment complexes and the mayor said our dedicated police officers have acted on those concerns -- a handful of problems."
"Do you hear yourself?" Vance replied. "Only 'a handful' of apartment complexes in America were taken over by Venezuelan gangs, and Donald Trump is the problem? Not Kamala Harris's open border?"
More fear mongering, I guess.samurai_science said:
I doubt the Marines see any action
🚨BREAKING: News Leaks suggest rioters in Los Angeles are planning to attack the 500 Marines tonight in a 5th night of violence
— The Patriot Oasis™ (@ThePatriotOasis) June 10, 2025
usmcbrooks said:More fear mongering, I guess.samurai_science said:
I doubt the Marines see any action🚨BREAKING: News Leaks suggest rioters in Los Angeles are planning to attack the 500 Marines tonight in a 5th night of violence
— The Patriot Oasis™ (@ThePatriotOasis) June 10, 2025
yes, but for local Law Enforcement, it was too little too late and they admitted that they were "overwhelmed".samurai_science said:Dad-O-Lot said:So, how much rioting and looting are acceptable and allowable?Gig em G said:
The overwhelming majority of LA is fine…and only a fraction are rioting and looting. The media always love to fearmonger
https://www.youtube.com/live/3LXQWU67Ufk?si=FSJqVu6ys_fK_pHN
At what point SHOULD law enforcement get involved?
Is "some" rioting OK as long as there are 10x more people being peaceful?
Is say, 1 burning car per 1000 "peaceful protestors" an acceptable ratio?
Law enforcement is involved
