***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

179,737 Views | 2162 Replies | Last: 17 hrs ago by BusterAg
techno-ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to fc2112 • 10:36a, 6/24/25
And they said Trump would be the one ignoring SCOTUS.
Pro College Station Convention Center
Reply Quote
ThunderCougarFalconBird
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:03a, 6/24/25
Whelp. Trump filed a brief with scotus pointing out the district court's defiance. Asked for clarification that the administration can ignore the district court and to reassign the case on remand for willful defiance of scotus.
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:16a, 6/24/25
Reply Quote
Get Off My Lawn
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ThunderCougarFalconBird • 11:16a, 6/24/25
ThunderCougarFalconBird said:
Whelp. Trump filed a brief with scotus pointing out the district court's defiance. Asked for clarification that the administration can ignore the district court and to reassign the case on remand for willful defiance of scotus.
Nice. "Hey, Roberts: this twerp is defying your authority. You gonna keep being a ***** or man up and get your subordinates in line?"
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:36p, 6/24/25
Reply Quote
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:38p, 6/24/25

Democrat hero's, all of them.
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:42p, 6/24/25
So I guess there is a House Oversight hearing today on Auto Pen Biden. Trump waived executive privilege for one of the guests. Don't have time to follow this more right now.

Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:53p, 6/24/25
Reply Quote
BMX Bandit
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 12:54p, 6/24/25
now you will see biden saying the privilege is for the former president, and Trump saying the current president gets to decide privilege. recall the case where chutkan said "Presidents are not kings, and Plaintiff is not
President."?

sorry joe, whats good for the goose is good for the gander.
Reply Quote
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BMX Bandit • 1:01p, 6/24/25
BMX Bandit said:


sorry joe, whats good for the goose is good for the gander.

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:03p, 6/24/25
Reply Quote
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 1:08p, 6/24/25
Quoting Sotomayor? That's showing he is as stupid as she is.
Reply Quote
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:08p, 6/24/25
Eisen digging for legal turds as usual vs. Trump.
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:55p, 6/24/25
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:10p, 6/24/25
Thread.

Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:36p, 6/24/25
Reply Quote
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:06a, 6/25/25
And, another injunction; Biden District Court judge (from Taipei, confirmed 52-45) finds Trump can't undo what Peepaw funded.
Quote:
A federal judge on Tuesday issued a ruling blocking the Trump administration from withholding funds for electric vehicle charger infrastructure from 14 states.
U.S. District Judge Tana Lin said the government overstepped their Constitutional authority by refusing to disperse dollars attached to the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act passed by former President Biden.

The initiative was created to help rid EV drivers of range anxiety, which is defined as the unease experienced by electric vehicle ("EV") drivers when they are unsure where the next charging station might be and whether their car's battery has sufficient charge to get them there.
"Congress appropriated $5 billion to fund a National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure ("NEVI") Formula Program, the purpose of which wasand still is 'to strategically deploy electric vehicle charging infrastructure and to establish an interconnected network to facilitate data collection, access, and reliability,'" Lim's order.
Reply Quote
CatD11Ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:03a, 6/25/25
Reply Quote
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to CatD11Ag • 6:36a, 6/25/25
Yes that's been the primary discussion over the past 24 hours. Yesterday around this time the chief of staff at the DoJ noted this is an Article III insurrection. The question is, why haven't they done anything about it other than tweet?


Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:08p, 6/25/25
Reply Quote
techno-ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 1:12p, 6/25/25
will25u said:

Good. Time to stop pulling punches. The federal judiciary has stepped out of constitutional bounds repeatedly in their fight against Trump.
Pro College Station Convention Center
Reply Quote
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:38p, 6/25/25
Reply Quote
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:48p, 6/25/25
More on the 'auto-injunctions' the MD circuit has enabled.
Reply Quote
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:59a, 6/26/25
Perkins Coie (sigh) files motion for emergency relief for travel ban related matter impacting their clients from Somalia/Afghanistan who want to come to the US as refugees, in Western District of Washington (Seattle).

Breyer bro is back in action about posse comitatus national guard issue he wants to litigate and rule on, despite not having jurisdiction and having lost already anyway on a similar issue.
Reply Quote
FTAG 2000
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:08a, 6/26/25
Hey Pam,

Take a break from Fox News and ring up Eisen for sedition.
Reply Quote
Stat Monitor Repairman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:48p, 6/26/25

Is this for real?
Reply Quote
1 edit
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:52p, 6/26/25

Reply Quote
1 edit
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:38a, 6/27/25
So was scotus ruling this morning, will the government have to file motions for removing them nationwide? Or do they revert to just being preliminary injunctions for the plaintiffs?
Reply Quote
BMX Bandit
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 10:47a, 6/27/25
motions will need to be filed, but remember this does not apply to those cases under the administrative procedures act

Quote:
Nothing we say today resolves the distinct question whether the Administrative Procedure Act authorizes federal courts to vacate federal agency action
Reply Quote
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BMX Bandit • 10:50a, 6/27/25
BMX Bandit said:
motions will need to be filed, but remember this does not apply to those cases under the administrative procedures act

Quote:
Nothing we say today resolves the distinct question whether the Administrative Procedure Act authorizes federal courts to vacate federal agency action
So is that saying, "We'll smack those down later?"
Reply Quote
BMX Bandit
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 10:52a, 6/27/25
maybe, but how would they?

the decision today was based on there being no inherent right to issue a universal injunction and no power from congress granting it. the APA specifically grants that power.
Reply Quote
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BMX Bandit • 10:56a, 6/27/25
BMX Bandit said:
maybe, but how would they?

the decision today was based on there being no inherent right to issue a universal injunction and no power from congress granting it. the APA specifically grants that power.
Depends on the case. Those deportation cases have found that habeas is not provided under the APA, I thought. And class action is not conducive to habeas.
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:57a, 6/27/25
90+ Nationwide injunctions have been issued against Trump since inauguration Day.

Per Harvard legal review, over half of All Nationwide injunctions since they were first implemented (70+ years ago) have been taken against Trump.
Reply Quote
BMX Bandit
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 10:58a, 6/27/25
so in cases where the APA does not apply, the APA injunction power cannot be used. I don't think that is in question.

I don't see a path for the court to hold that in APA actions, the district courts cannot issue injunctions stopping agency action
Reply Quote
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BMX Bandit • 11:00a, 6/27/25
BMX Bandit said:
so in cases where the APA does not apply, the APA injunction power cannot be used. I don't think that is in question.

I don't see a path for the court to hold that in APA actions, the district courts cannot issue injunctions stopping agency action
Agree but the problem is the APA is being improperly used in many of these cases.
Reply Quote
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.