***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

196,860 Views | 2283 Replies | Last: 11 hrs ago by Ag with kids
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 8:07p, 3/9/25
aggiehawg said:
Im Gipper said:
Congress does not write the rules of procedure.

The Supreme Court does!
Really?

US Code Title 18? Criminal Procedure?

US Code Title 28? Civil Procedure?


Yes, really.

The Supreme Court writes them and submits to Congress to include in the USC

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:09p, 3/9/25
Example here!

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/frcr23_d1pf.pdf

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:08p, 3/10/25
Margot Cleveland has started a new tracker for these cases at the Federalist. She also goes through case law analysis. For those interested the first installment is HERE
Reply Quote
jamieboy2014
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:10p, 3/10/25
Did the government wind up paying the 2 billion yet. Haven't seen anything on that. Did the administration appeal the case again after the judge clarified his order?
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:53p, 3/10/25
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:24p, 3/10/25
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:17p, 3/10/25
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:23p, 3/10/25


Reply Quote
1 edit
aggiejayrod
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 7:25p, 3/10/25
This is the right decision in the interim. You can't unring the bell if we deport him immediately. Give him his day in court then put him on the next flight out of the country.

I do question if they have jurisdiction because he's being held in Louisiana.
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:38p, 3/10/25
Reply Quote
FTAG 2000
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 7:56p, 3/10/25
will25u said:


Clown world. I missed where some district judge was elected grand supreme dictator of the United States.

This judge needs ear holed with a Ryan Prager fastball.
Reply Quote
Ag with kids
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 11:35p, 3/10/25
will25u said:
I hope the ultimate ending of all these judicial rulings is that the SCOTUS finally puts their foot down and tells the district courts that they CANNOT order a NATIONWIDE ruling...
Reply Quote
BusterAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:06a, 3/11/25
Here is the money shot of the Dellinger appeals decision, IMO.
Quote:
Never mind the tension between Dellinger's assertions that OSC is critically important to the public interest but simultaneously lacks significant executive power.

Based on my experience with litigation, most opinions hold one or two truths, and pages and pages of analysis that gives them permission to state those one or two truths. That is the nature of the legal industry, but, in the end, it is just one or two arguments that win or lose the day.

Here the appeals court is smacking down Dellinger for talking out of both sides of their mouth depending on which prong they are addressing.

This appeals opinion is pretty efficient.
Reply Quote
jamieboy2014
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jamieboy2014 • 12:26p, 3/11/25
jamieboy2014 said:
Did the government wind up paying the 2 billion yet. Haven't seen anything on that. Did the administration appeal the case again after the judge clarified his order?
Anyone have an update?
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:40p, 3/11/25
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:29p, 3/11/25
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:37p, 3/11/25
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:43p, 3/11/25
Reply Quote
titan
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 9:56p, 3/11/25
will25u said:
Excellent! This is one of the catch-22s that was outlined by this man's rather comprehensible take. That the Trump administration is invoking the need to post the figure means they are aware of it.

This is also kicking off the next stage of the process and means they are prepared.


FrioAg 00:
Leftist Democrats "have completely overplayed the Racism accusation. Honestly my first reaction when I hear it today is to assume bad intentions by the accuser, not the accused."
Reply Quote
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 5:08a, 3/12/25
That whole post is great news. Ali and his clerks really are complete clowns, imho.

Also, Africa Development chief who tried to lock out DOGE a ways back is…rejected by the courts in his suit claiming he can't be fired. Clown.
Reply Quote
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:14a, 3/12/25
LOL, Judge Ali worked for the MacArthur Foundation and previously litigated against Trump?


This clown needs to be removed from the bench.

ETA, meant to include this one which explains more of his history.

Quote:
The annual IRS 990 filings by the Roderick And Solange Macarthur Justice Center show that the center holds a massive stock portfolio including many companies with large financial fundings deals with USAID. Among those companies are Abbott Labs, Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer. The massive stock portfolio was held by the center while Ali was employed as the Executive Director.

Ali's recent ruling for USAID is not the first time that Amir Hatem Mahdy Ali has opposed the Trump administration on foreign matters.

In 2017, as an attorney representing the Roderick and Solange MacArthur Justice Center in Washington DC, Ali was listed with the Petitioners in the case of Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Petitioners v. International Refugee Assistance Project, et al. Docketed: June 2, 2017, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

This was the case where President Trump during the early days of his first time administration had signed Executive Order 13769, Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States (January 27, 2017) The original travel ban. Travel ban for people from seven majority-Muslim countries (Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen) for 90 days, with certain exceptions: Also suspended refugee resettlement for 120 days and banned Syrian refugees indefinitely. Lowered cap for refugee admissions for fiscal year 2017 from 110,000 to 50,000.
Reply Quote
1 edit
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:27p, 3/12/25
TRO issued.



Reply Quote
FTAG 2000
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 4:56p, 3/12/25
will25u said:
TRO issued.





I missed Howell being on the ballot in 2020. Another Obama - Biden loving judge decreeing themselves supreme dictator of the United States.

Where you at, Roberts and Amy Comey?
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:21p, 3/12/25



Reply Quote
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 5:37p, 3/12/25
It's just a disaster.

Spoiler alert; Chutkan will say the billions need to be disbursed immediately.
Reply Quote
txags92
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 5:37p, 3/12/25
will25u said:



Seems like another case that belongs in the court of Federal Claims, not district court.
Reply Quote
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:48p, 3/12/25
Chutkan is a piece of garbage. She's most likely never read the Constitution.

She invoked due process, just like Howell did in the Perkins Coie case. Corrupt *****.
Reply Quote
1 edit
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:03p, 3/12/25
Feel bad for the people doing work for DOGE. Their lives are about to get complicated if they weren't already.

Reply Quote
2 edits
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:09p, 3/12/25
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:30p, 3/12/25
Reply Quote
BusterAg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 9:52p, 3/12/25
will25u said:
Feel bad for the people doing work for DOGE. Their lives are about to get complicated if they weren't already.

DOGE has a lawyer on staff in every agency it is working with. They have plenty of legal representation.

I think that Judge Chutzpa is going to be sorely disappointed with what she finds.

All Doge does is point out information. Trump and the different department heads make all of the decisions, based on Doge's recommendations.

Doge has zero authority to do squat.
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:57p, 3/12/25
Punt.

Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BusterAg • 9:58p, 3/12/25
I was mostly commenting on them being doxxed by Judges order.
Reply Quote
will25u
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:00p, 3/12/25
Reply Quote
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 6:28a, 3/13/25
will25u said:
Those poor Catholic Bishops. If only there was a large organization with a huge financial endowment/resources they could go to, in support of their religious mission to charitably care for the poor. 'Non-profit' leadership celebrating the holy season of lent by suing to keep their taxpayer human trafficking operation going regardless of how voters their parishioners & the elected government feel about it.



Reply Quote
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.