***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

176,316 Views | 2129 Replies | Last: 23 hrs ago by nortex97
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:11p, 7/20/25
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
3
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 4:48a, 7/21/25
AG
Note that this one wasn't a preliminary injunction/TRO, but after a trial on the merits found that the APA was violated. Not 'that big' a deal, but still, the finding that the NIH engaged in "pervasive racial discrimination in selecting grants for termination" this year sounds absurd on its face to me.

Reply Quote
5
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:00a, 7/21/25
AG
Trump wins again, after feebled Biden(*) WH proclaimed the ERA (nominally the 28th) had been ratified for no sane legal reason at all. In the 9th circuit.
Quote:
In a terse two-page order, the three judges rejected an appeal of a challenge to Selective Service registration on the basis that it violated Biden's imaginary 28th Amendment. It only took one paragraph to dispense with that claim, emphasis mine:
Quote:
The district court properly dismissed Valame's action because Valame failed to allege facts sufficient to state any plausible claim. See Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57, 83 (1981) (rejecting the argument that the MSSA is unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment); Newman v. Wengler, 790 F.3d 876, 880 (9th Cir. 2015) (explaining that "we do not engage in anticipatory overruling of Supreme Court precedent"); Somers v. Apple, Inc., 729 F.3d 953, 959 (9th Cir. 2013) (explaining that dismissal "under Rule 12(b)(6) is proper when the complaint either (1) lacks a cognizable legal theory or (2) fails to allege sufficient facts to support a cognizable legal theory"). We reject as meritless Valame's contention that the Equal Rights Amendment was ratified as the Twenty-Eighth Amendment to the Constitution.

Bu-bu-bu-but Biden said it was! Well, there's something even funnier about that, as Aaron points out. Even Biden's Department of Justice didn't share Biden's "belief":
Quote:
And not for nothing, but Joe Biden was one of the named parties in the court below, him being sued in his official capacity as President of the United States. The case was originally captioned Valame v. Biden, et al. Naturally today, it reads as Valame v. Trump, et al., because when the president is sued in his or her official capacity, it means the name on the caption is the current president. But what all of that tells you is that the Biden Administration had been fighting this case since June of 2023 and the government's lawyers never said, 'you know what? Valame is right! The ERA is part of the Constitution!' Even after Biden made his declaration that the ERA is part of the Constitution, his administration's lawyers were still fighting it through the end of his term.

It's almost as if Joe Biden wasn't really in charge of his administration or something. But that's just crazy talk!!!

The entire episode should embarrass everyone involved in it. It won't, because the Biden Regency is shameless, but it should.

At any rate, we now have yet another court decision ruling that the ERA never got successfully ratified. That should put an end to the chicanery of Democrats who cheered Biden's proclamation in January and who insisted that the National Archives ignore the record and adopt it anyway. The should in this case is pretty much equal to the should in the previous paragraph, however, because Democrats and their allies in the Protection Racket Media will continue to scream about the rule of law while arguing that presidents can unilaterally amend the Constitution. Shamelessness is the main feature of this political age.

FJB ad infinitum.
Reply Quote
9
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:31p, 7/21/25
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
11
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:34p, 7/21/25

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
4
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:41p, 7/21/25
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
10
Aggie Jurist
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:32p, 7/21/25
AG
Being on the federal bench used to mean something - apparently not any longer.

The damage being done to the legitimacy of the federal judiciary by these complete partisans cannot be adequately measured. They are turning our court system into something more recognizable in third world countries.
Reply Quote
12
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggie Jurist • 11:04p, 7/21/25
AG
Aggie Jurist said:
Being on the federal bench used to mean something - apparently not any longer.

The damage being done to the legitimacy of the federal judiciary by these complete partisans cannot be adequately measured. They are turning our court system into something more recognizable in third world countries.

Third world politics is exactly what the leftists want.
Reply Quote
12
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 4:07a, 7/22/25
AG
Indira Talwani is going to lose badly, yet again. She is a disgrace and is in my 'top 3 should be impeached immediately' Biden-Sotero judges.

Just as an example of the Senate GOP's utter fecklessness, this Berkeley JD clown was confirmed 94-0. Great job, Cornyn/Cruz. She is, simply put, a liar.


Congress and SCOTUS (by re-assigning cases on emergency appeal from activist, lawless partisans) need to act.

More at the thread.
Reply Quote
10
japantiger
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:58a, 7/22/25
S
So what's the tally now:

Total bull**** injunctions?
Total appealed to this point?
Total wins for POTUS?

Reply Quote
6
Mathguy64
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:12a, 7/22/25
AG
Can I find a Judge who will rule that Congress needs to include money in the budget for me? Or just rule that POTUS gives me money directly?

That seems fair.
Reply Quote
5
samurai_science
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to japantiger • 11:33a, 7/22/25
japantiger said:
So what's the tally now:

Total bull**** injunctions?
Total appealed to this point?
Total wins for POTUS?



Liberals are losing but it's taking a while and everything is getting appealed
Reply Quote
9
1 edit
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 11:42a, 7/22/25
AG
nortex97 said:
Indira Talwani is going to lose badly, yet again. She is a disgrace and is in my 'top 3 should be impeached immediately' Biden-Sotero judges.

Just as an example of the Senate GOP's utter fecklessness, this Berkeley JD clown was confirmed 94-0. Great job, Cornyn/Cruz. She is, simply put, a liar.


Congress and SCOTUS (by re-assigning cases on emergency appeal from activist, lawless partisans) need to act.

More at the thread.

So a Democrat appointee lied to Congress. Quelle surprise.

Ever notice these unconstitutional partisan rulings always come from the Democrat side of the aisle? Has a Republican judicial appointee done anything so egregious lately? Amazing.
Pro College Station Convention Center
Reply Quote
9
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Mathguy64 • 11:48a, 7/22/25
AG
Mathguy64 said:
Can I find a Judge who will rule that Congress needs to include money in the budget for me? Or just rule that POTUS gives me money directly?

That seems fair.

It's a free speech/equal protection matter alike now, that if gov't gave you money last year they have to give you more if you are talking about things, and if the funds aren't appropriated, a judge will order the executive branch to spend money/give it to you, anyway.

No kings, and no one is above the law, dude.
Reply Quote
2
dvldog
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to japantiger • 11:49a, 7/22/25
AG
japantiger said:
So what's the tally now:

Total bull**** injunctions?
Total appealed to this point?
Total wins for POTUS?


Not exactly what you're asking but a decent visual:

Reply Quote
12
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:06p, 7/22/25
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
5
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:46p, 7/22/25

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
7
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 12:53p, 7/22/25
AG
Quote:
More Humphrey's news--The D.C. Circuit (No. 25-5261) has entered an order in the Slaughter appeal administratively staying the district court's judgment directing Trump to rehire the former FTC commissioner. This just means the court is staying the order in order to consider whether to grant a stay on the merits. But what's really interesting about this is that the Trump administration sought a stay in the D.C. Circuit before the district court even ruled on its (still pending) motion to stay at the trial level. I've never seen that done before.

It is very unusual for federal appellate courts to act that quickly. But given the level of lawfare, happy it is happening.
Reply Quote
11
Mathguy64
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:54p, 7/22/25
AG
Seems to me that's a 10th amendment deal. It's not a federally mandated item in the constitution. Those states are free to find those programs themselves. With their own tax revenues. And if the voters in those states are ok with that then that's fine. If those voters are not ok with that, then they have a solution to their problem.
Reply Quote
3
txags92
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Mathguy64 • 1:02p, 7/22/25
AG
Mathguy64 said:
Seems to me that's a 10th amendment deal. It's not a federally mandated item in the constitution. Those states are free to find those programs themselves. With their own tax revenues. And if the voters in those states are ok with that then that's fine. If those voters are not ok with that, then they have a solution to their problem.

Import new voters?
Reply Quote
5
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:15p, 7/22/25
AG

They are scared. No recess, Thune. Get…it…done.
Reply Quote
9
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 1:18p, 7/22/25
nortex97 said:

They are scared. No recess, Thune. Get…it…done.

Not really horrible. Just put someone else in there even BETTER!

ETA: Has this ever been done before?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nortex97 • 1:20p, 7/22/25
LOL. No one is scared of Habba. She was wholly unqualified for the job.

But her back on TV looking hot, and get the real nominees lined up for confimration!

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
4
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 1:20p, 7/22/25
Quote:
Not really horrible. Just put someone else in there even BETTER!

Not a single US Attorney has been approved by the Senate since Trump took office.

And only one federal judge.

This is a problem.
Reply Quote
10
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 1:24p, 7/22/25
Ellis Wyatt said:
Quote:
Not really horrible. Just put someone else in there even BETTER!

Not a single US Attorney has been approved by the Senate since Trump took office.

And only one federal judge.

This is a problem.

Recess appointments incoming? House is Adjourned....

ETA: Doubtful it happens.
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 1:24p, 7/22/25
Can he do a recess appointment in this situation? I'm all for it, but what's the process?

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
3
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 1:25p, 7/22/25
They had better. The obstruction never stops. GOP always cooperates with democrats--- result: criminals on the bench and prosecuting innocent people.
Reply Quote
5
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:20p, 7/22/25
DOJ removed the one that the judges appointed. Look for Trump will probably appoint a new USA soon.

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
11
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:58p, 7/22/25
AG
Who fee if Habba will pop back over to NY to provide defense for Trump when Queen Letitia brings bribery charges against Trump for CBS firing Colbert (yes, it's been put out there).
Reply Quote
Deerdude
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:21p, 7/22/25
I thought she did mortgage fraud, how's she not behind bars?
Reply Quote
2
will25u
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:29p, 7/22/25
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Reply Quote
3
Ellis Wyatt
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 6:46p, 7/22/25
Letitia better mind her own business.
Reply Quote
3
flown-the-coop
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ellis Wyatt • 6:50p, 7/22/25
AG
No better way for her to distract from that than to get Trump.
Reply Quote
2
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 4:22a, 7/23/25
AG
Sure, but this was only possible by the communist judges because Thune's senate has now sat on her nomination for over 120 days, supposedly.

Grock says it was referred to the judiciary committee on June 30th. Grassley is not one I'd consider a 'snake in the grass' but when is it going to advance?
Reply Quote
6
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to will25u • 4:35a, 7/23/25
AG
will25u said:

That was a nice win. More at the link.
Quote:
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is allowed to end the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for roughly 10,000 Afghans and Cameroonians while a court challenge against the move continues to play out in court, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday. The court determined that while CASA an immigration advocacy group suing DHS has a plausible case, there is not enough evidence to block the TPS phaseout while the court challenge continues.

Also, New Jersey law shielding illegal aliens from detention is now history.
Quote:
An appeals court has overturned a New Jersey sanctuary law that attempted to ban state and local agencies, as well as private contractors, from partnering with the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to detain illegal aliens in detention centers.

On Tuesday, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in a 2-1 decision that New Jersey's law, known as AB 5207, "interferes with the federal government's core power to enforce immigration laws" by banning state and local agencies and private contractors from working with ICE to operate detention centers for illegal aliens.

"New Jersey is on the wrong side of that line. It dislikes some of the federal government's immigration tools, so it passed a law with the "intent" to forbid new contracts for civil immigration detention," the decision states:
Quote:
"[T]he National Government is, and must be, controlled by the people without collateral interference by the States." Because New Jersey knew that it could not openly bar the federal government from contracting to detain immigrants, it instead eliminated everyone with whom the federal government might contract within its borders. It asks us not to notice the federal elephant in the room. Yet we can see the law for what it really is, "claiming the authority to dictate the manner in which the federal [immigration] function is carried out." Letting states do that would "chang[e] totally the character of" our federal system by "transfer[ring] the supremacy, in fact, to the states." The U.S. Constitution is supreme, and intergovernmental immunity protects that supremacy. New Jersey's law directly regulates the federal government, so it is unconstitutional as applied to CoreCivic. We will affirm. [Emphasis added]

The ruling affirms a district court ruling that similarly found New Jersey's ban on private detention of illegal aliens to be unconstitutional.

New Jersey Democrats passed the ban in 2023 in an attempt to prevent CoreCivic, a longtime private detention contractor, from having its ICE contract in Elizabeth, New Jersey, renewed. As the appeals court states, though, ICE relies on state and local agencies as well as private contractors to operate such detention of illegal aliens.

As Homan has noted, working with local jails/law enforcement to arrest/detain illegal aliens already held in state/city facilities makes ICE/CBP officers safer, and the communities as well.
Reply Quote
7
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.