74OA said:

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

74OA said:

---

The amount of unreleased evidence the government has possession of is a bit mindboggling.

For example: "The three-page index is a report generated by the FBI that lists the evidence inventoried by federal law enforcement during the multiple investigations into his conduct. According to that index, the remaining materials include 40 computers and electronic devices, 26 storage drives, more than 70 CDs and six recording devices. The devices hold more than 300 gigabytes of data, according to the DOJ. The evidence also includes approximately 60 pieces of physical evidence, including photographs, travel logs, employee lists...."

WOW

---

But nobody in any of those files right? Just fluff.

---

It's hard to believe. More:

"The unreleased evidence notably includes multiple documents related to two islands Epstein owned in the U.S. Virgin Islands, Little Saint James -- where his compound was located -- and Greater Saint James. According to the index, the files include a folder containing Island blueprints, photographs and other documents.
Some of the documents could shed light on who visited the island. According to the index, the files also include a Little Saint James logbook as well as multiple logs of boat trips to and from the island.
The evidence also includes multiple lists, one vaguely described as a "document with names" and an employee contact list."

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

That probably sounded funnier between you and your keyboard.

---

74OA said:

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

74OA said:

---

The amount of unreleased evidence the government has possession of is a bit mindboggling.

For example: "The three-page index is a report generated by the FBI that lists the evidence inventoried by federal law enforcement during the multiple investigations into his conduct. According to that index, the remaining materials include 40 computers and electronic devices, 26 storage drives, more than 70 CDs and six recording devices. The devices hold more than 300 gigabytes of data, according to the DOJ. The evidence also includes approximately 60 pieces of physical evidence, including photographs, travel logs, employee lists...."

WOW

---

But nobody in any of those files right? Just fluff.

---

It's hard to believe. More:

"The unreleased evidence notably includes multiple documents related to two islands Epstein owned in the U.S. Virgin Islands, Little Saint James -- where his compound was located -- and Greater Saint James. According to the index, the files include a folder containing Island blueprints, photographs and other documents.
Some of the documents could shed light on who visited the island. According to the index, the files also include a Little Saint James logbook as well as multiple logs of boat trips to and from the island.
The evidence also includes multiple lists, one vaguely described as a "document with names" and an employee contact list."

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

That probably sounded funnier between you and your keyboard.

---

The fact you keep mentioning Libs and Cms's shows your in bed with govt. This is not about political parties, libs, magas, cms's. Its pretty damn clear

---

bobbranco said:

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

That probably sounded funnier between you and your keyboard.

---

The fact you keep mentioning Libs and Cms's shows your in bed with govt. This is not about political parties, libs, magas, cms's. Its pretty damn clear

---

What is it about? Be clear.

At this point it is only about dumping on Trump and his administration.

---

bobbranco said:

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

That probably sounded funnier between you and your keyboard.

---

The fact you keep mentioning Libs and Cms's shows your in bed with govt. This is not about political parties, libs, magas, cms's. Its pretty damn clear

---

What is it about? Be clear.

At this point it is only about dumping on Trump and his administration.

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

That probably sounded funnier between you and your keyboard.

---

The fact you keep mentioning Libs and Cms's shows your in bed with govt. This is not about political parties, libs, magas, cms's. Its pretty damn clear

---

What is it about? Be clear.

At this point it is only about dumping on Trump and his administration.

---

So the last 4 years nobody dumped on Clinton or Prince Andrew. Puuullleeeze. I was happy when that happened because I have not taken a side on a dead pedophile and an imprisoned sex trafficker.

Both sides don't want this out. Stop goaltending for a party.

---

FWTXAg said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

That probably sounded funnier between you and your keyboard.

---

The fact you keep mentioning Libs and Cms's shows your in bed with govt. This is not about political parties, libs, magas, cms's. Its pretty damn clear

---

What is it about? Be clear.

At this point it is only about dumping on Trump and his administration.

---

You partisan hacks on both sides see and hear what you want to.


The only point is exposing the depraved nature of our government overlords while they continuously grow government and take money out of our pockets. Get with the program.

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

That probably sounded funnier between you and your keyboard.

---

The fact you keep mentioning Libs and Cms's shows your in bed with govt. This is not about political parties, libs, magas, cms's. Its pretty damn clear

---

bobbranco said:

---

FWTXAg said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

That probably sounded funnier between you and your keyboard.

---

The fact you keep mentioning Libs and Cms's shows your in bed with govt. This is not about political parties, libs, magas, cms's. Its pretty damn clear

---

What is it about? Be clear.

At this point it is only about dumping on Trump and his administration.

---

You partisan hacks on both sides see and hear what you want to.


The only point is exposing the depraved nature of our government overlords while they continuously grow government and take money out of our pockets. Get with the program.

---

Then get elected and fix it. Otherwise keep typing.

---

JUST IN: The Justice Department's bid to relesae Epstein grand jury info comes with a huge caveat that it will seek to redact not just victim info but other "personal identifying information." https://t.co/WCpLLLZSi5 pic.twitter.com/4WG20VFcog

— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) July 18, 2025

FobTies said:

---

Ok, "will he file a lawsuit". He knew the story was coming, he could have had a 1 paragraph legal letter drafted. Point is whether or not he will actually challenge in court where those DOJ assessments could be made public.

You seem to be an expert on lawsuits. Do you think he will go to court with WSJ?

---

We fixed the keg said:

---

Aginlakeway has a point here.

Releasing a list of actual names of people that haven't been charged with, let alone convicted, of a crime would be attempting to solve a problem while creating others. At best you might be able to release a redacted set with "Politician A" or "Actor B", but even then it might be opening up accusations against the wrong politicians or actors.

Having said that, (1) I don't trust that any politicians or 3 letter agencies have prosecuted everyone that has committed crimes associated with Epstein, (2) as such, I believe there are things her to be investigated and most likely to end in prosecutions, and (3) it is possible, because I am in this list, to think the messaging/PR by the Trump Admin has been horrid and made things worse, BUT it doesn't derail my support for all the great things being done.

Maybe a special prosecutor is the way to go, but whatever path is taken, there needs to be people beyond question teamed up to do this. Not a cherry-picked loyalist.

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

We fixed the keg said:

---

Aginlakeway has a point here.

Releasing a list of actual names of people that haven't been charged with, let alone convicted, of a crime would be attempting to solve a problem while creating others. At best you might be able to release a redacted set with "Politician A" or "Actor B", but even then it might be opening up accusations against the wrong politicians or actors.

Having said that, (1) I don't trust that any politicians or 3 letter agencies have prosecuted everyone that has committed crimes associated with Epstein, (2) as such, I believe there are things her to be investigated and most likely to end in prosecutions, and (3) it is possible, because I am in this list, to think the messaging/PR by the Trump Admin has been horrid and made things worse, BUT it doesn't derail my support for all the great things being done.

Maybe a special prosecutor is the way to go, but whatever path is taken, there needs to be people beyond question teamed up to do this. Not a cherry-picked loyalist.

---

How much would it really impact the people that associated with him, though?

We are aware he and Trump were buddies and that didn't stop him from becoming President.

We know he associated with Bill Clinton, Elon Musk, Bill Gates, and a number of others and none of their lives have been meaningfully altered.

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

We fixed the keg said:

---

Aginlakeway has a point here.

Releasing a list of actual names of people that haven't been charged with, let alone convicted, of a crime would be attempting to solve a problem while creating others. At best you might be able to release a redacted set with "Politician A" or "Actor B", but even then it might be opening up accusations against the wrong politicians or actors.

Having said that, (1) I don't trust that any politicians or 3 letter agencies have prosecuted everyone that has committed crimes associated with Epstein, (2) as such, I believe there are things her to be investigated and most likely to end in prosecutions, and (3) it is possible, because I am in this list, to think the messaging/PR by the Trump Admin has been horrid and made things worse, BUT it doesn't derail my support for all the great things being done.

Maybe a special prosecutor is the way to go, but whatever path is taken, there needs to be people beyond question teamed up to do this. Not a cherry-picked loyalist.

---

How much would it really impact the people that associated with him, though?

We are aware he and Trump were buddies and that didn't stop him from becoming President.

We know he associated with Bill Clinton, Elon Musk, Bill Gates, and a number of others and none of their lives have been meaningfully altered.

---

It would greatly impact the hundreds of associates or friends or employees that aren't famous. Why should their names be dragged into this?

I don't recall mass murderer's friends and associates being named.

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

It's very, very fake news. It has Trump listed as pro se. No way in hell he does that.

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Nevermind. It was fake!

---

Im Gipper said:

---

They cannot release any grand jury documents.

They can release anything in their file that they want if approved by the President.

---

Im Gipper said:

---

They cannot release any grand jury documents.

They can release anything in their file that they want if approved by the President.

---

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump is seeking $10 BILLION in damages against the Wall Street Journal for their fake Epstein hit piece against him

It’s about to be renamed the TRUMP Street Journal 🤣🔥 pic.twitter.com/hkGWX9Y0QV

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) July 18, 2025

Im Gipper said:

---

Grand jury testimony cannot be made public without a court order. Yes, in theory, they could just release it and break the rules of the court, but this administration will not do that. The Trump Department of Justice is not lawless like liberals.

---