Francis Macomber said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

Who knew MAGA was so pedophile enabling?

---

From the party that promotes and grooms the MAPs. Lol

---

I have no clue what this means. And I don't consider myself a democrat, anyways.

---

El Gallo Blanco said:

---

To the limp wristed liberals and CM's calling MAGA a "cult" and claiming that Trump's followers all have his back and will goaltend for him no matter what...you need to venture out more. He and his son and various influencers are getting RAKED over the coals by MAGA peeps over this Epstein stuff. These are not bots, these are real Trump supporters who voted for him 3 times who feel betrayed and are PISSED OFF at the insulting tone he is directing at them.

---

We fixed the keg said:

---

Aginlakeway has a point here.

Releasing a list of actual names of people that haven't been charged with, let alone convicted, of a crime would be attempting to solve a problem while creating others. At best you might be able to release a redacted set with "Politician A" or "Actor B", but even then it might be opening up accusations against the wrong politicians or actors.

Having said that, (1) I don't trust that any politicians or 3 letter agencies have prosecuted everyone that has committed crimes associated with Epstein, (2) as such, I believe there are things her to be investigated and most likely to end in prosecutions, and (3) it is possible, because I am in this list, to think the messaging/PR by the Trump Admin has been horrid and made things worse, BUT it doesn't derail my support for all the great things being done.

Maybe a special prosecutor is the way to go, but whatever path is taken, there needs to be people beyond question teamed up to do this. Not a cherry-picked loyalist.

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

Who knew MAGA was so pedophile enabling?

---

From the party that promotes and grooms the MAPs. Lol

---

I have no clue what this means. And I don't consider myself a democrat, anyways.

---

Then what do you consider yourself, because all of your posting history sounds just like what a modern day Democrat would say.

---

AgDev01 said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

They will say the desired goal is to stop pedos.

But the real desire is either to get off on conspiracy theories or to enjoy some sort of take down of public figures so they can talk about it on the internet.

The fact they don't clamor first for justice but instead to see names and evidence tells you what you need to know.

---

This is some incredible gaslighting. You are basically arguing that the government covering up crimes is okay because the people asking for information from the coverup are asking the wrong question.

Releasing the evidence is the first step in getting justice, the same as it was when people were calling on the j6 committee to release all of their documents. Keeping this stuff from coming out sure isn't the path to justice for anyone.

---

El Gallo Blanco said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

Who knew MAGA was so pedophile enabling?

---

From the party that promotes and grooms the MAPs. Lol

---

I have no clue what this means. And I don't consider myself a democrat, anyways.

---

Then what do you consider yourself, because all of your posting history sounds just like what a modern day Democrat would say.

---

At the very best, he's a "Lincoln Project" CM...

---

BQ78 said:

---

If they are not going to be prosecuted (which seems to be the case), release their names. That way, maybe their constituents won't send them back to office again or the consumers of their products can go to another source, versus funding their sick fetishes.

---

Southlake said:

---

The Royal Family is behind this.

---

We fixed the keg said:

---

Aginlakeway has a point here.

Releasing a list of actual names of people that haven't been charged with, let alone convicted, of a crime would be attempting to solve a problem while creating others. At best you might be able to release a redacted set with "Politician A" or "Actor B", but even then it might be opening up accusations against the wrong politicians or actors.


Maybe a special prosecutor is the way to go, but whatever path is taken, there needs to be people beyond question teamed up to do this. Not a cherry-picked loyalist.

---

Pumpkinhead said:

---

The AG (Bondi) is the one who have to appoint a special prosecutor whom would then report to Bondi. A special prosecutor in this case would just be a dog and pony show.

---

Im Gipper said:

---

"Dam is breaking" is the new "walls are closing in". I miss "noose is tightening"

I’m told that the WSJ article about the Trump letter to Epstein is just the tip of the iceberg. “The dam is breaking”.

More to come…

— Brian Krassenstein (@krassenstein) July 18, 2025

---

NormanEH said:

---

So tired of the twitter morons "leaking" that "big news" is about to break. Nothing burger every time.

---

BQ78 said:

---

If they are not going to be prosecuted (which seems to be the case), release their names. That way, maybe their constituents won't send them back to office again or the consumers of their products can go to another source, versus funding their sick fetishes.

---

Pumpkinhead said:

---

Anyone who has strong feelings about wanting to know 'everything' about Epstein is going to be deeply disappointed and underwhelmed. Lots of stuff is going to be redacted and kept out of the public, to protect victim's privacy and to not create new victims - and inviting law suits against the government - of a mob witch hunt by putting the names of people out there whom there is no credible evidence against of criminal wrongdoing doing.


Could more have been released then there has been? Sure. Probably. Did Bondi in particular mismanage this topic? Definitely. But whatever more is released is never going to put to rest the conspiracy theories or satisfy the folks who have bought into the theories. And there will always be bloggers and media channels pushing theories to get clicks and views making $$$ off the conspiracy theory industry.

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Pumpkinhead said:

---

Anyone who has strong feelings about wanting to know 'everything' about Epstein is going to be deeply disappointed and underwhelmed. Lots of stuff is going to be redacted and kept out of the public, to protect victim's privacy and to not create new victims - and inviting law suits against the government - of a mob witch hunt by putting the names of people out there whom there is no credible evidence against of criminal wrongdoing doing.


Could more have been released then there has been? Sure. Probably. Did Bondi in particular mismanage this topic? Definitely. But whatever more is released is never going to put to rest the conspiracy theories or satisfy the folks who have bought into the theories. And there will always be bloggers and media channels pushing theories to get clicks and views making $$$ off the conspiracy theory industry.

---

This x 1000. Seems obvious to me. You can't release the "files" or all the names just because they were associates.

Do neighbors and/or associates of serial killers have their names released to the public?

This won't ever happen.

---

Rapier108 said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Pumpkinhead said:

---

Anyone who has strong feelings about wanting to know 'everything' about Epstein is going to be deeply disappointed and underwhelmed. Lots of stuff is going to be redacted and kept out of the public, to protect victim's privacy and to not create new victims - and inviting law suits against the government - of a mob witch hunt by putting the names of people out there whom there is no credible evidence against of criminal wrongdoing doing.


Could more have been released then there has been? Sure. Probably. Did Bondi in particular mismanage this topic? Definitely. But whatever more is released is never going to put to rest the conspiracy theories or satisfy the folks who have bought into the theories. And there will always be bloggers and media channels pushing theories to get clicks and views making $$$ off the conspiracy theory industry.

---

This x 1000. Seems obvious to me. You can't release the "files" or all the names just because they were associates.

Do neighbors and/or associates of serial killers have their names released to the public?

This won't ever happen.

---

Sadly, a lot of people just want "the list" so they can try to publicly destroy everyone who had even a passing association with Epstein.

Hell, some people even seem to want all the kiddie porn videos made public, probably because they think they will get to see people like Clinton, Gates, Trump, DiCaprio, etc. etc. etc. raping kids. (This is not referring to anyone here, just some of the hardcore Epsteiners around the Internet.)

Few even seems to want actual justice anymore. Most just want mob "justice" and a chance to dunk on their political enemies by yelling "see what your guy did." We see that with all the leftists here who, in their minds, have convicted Trump of pedophilia.

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

Somehow Russia will be the centerpiece of any conspiracy involving Trump.

I bet Epstein had dirt on Trump, most likely hours and hours of video of Trump with underage girls, and Putin knew this and used it to get classified information from Trump after he got Trump elected by embarrassing Hillary.

This is all starting to make sense.

-libs and cms..., probably

---

74OA said:

---

The amount of unreleased evidence the government has possession of is a bit mindboggling.

For example: "The three-page index is a report generated by the FBI that lists the evidence inventoried by federal law enforcement during the multiple investigations into his conduct. According to that index, the remaining materials include 40 computers and electronic devices, 26 storage drives, more than 70 CDs and six recording devices. The devices hold more than 300 gigabytes of data, according to the DOJ. The evidence also includes approximately 60 pieces of physical evidence, including photographs, travel logs, employee lists...."

WOW

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

74OA said:

---

The amount of unreleased evidence the government has possession of is a bit mindboggling.

For example: "The three-page index is a report generated by the FBI that lists the evidence inventoried by federal law enforcement during the multiple investigations into his conduct. According to that index, the remaining materials include 40 computers and electronic devices, 26 storage drives, more than 70 CDs and six recording devices. The devices hold more than 300 gigabytes of data, according to the DOJ. The evidence also includes approximately 60 pieces of physical evidence, including photographs, travel logs, employee lists...."

WOW

---

But nobody in any of those files right? Just fluff.

---