DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list

172,545 Views | 2490 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by nortex97
Ervin Burrell
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Old McDonald • 7:22p, 7/27/25
Old McDonald said:
Ag CPA said:
OPAG said:
Let me tell ya how this is going to go.

Those that think Trump is stupid and impetuous and just fly's off the handle and has no ability to message or is just trying to CHA, are the same group that has been heavily gaslighted and programmed with TDS or they are the old guard Rino's seeking to divide the "Maga" camp.

Look at the timing of all this? Why did they have to even bring Epstein up at all at the time they did? You think it's just random coincidence? If you think that your are not very bright and have limited powers of critical / analytical thinking.

If you think the timing of the release of Bondi's message was just random, well, I don't know what to say.

And do you think Trump's response at the press meeting (as bad as it looked - was just a random melt down?

Again if you think that I can't help you.

Nothing done concerning this subject has been random or haphazard. They know this was a big deal to many in MAGA. Trump and team knew there was going to be a bruhah over the way he responded.

So what really happened here is that they drew the left into this. They can't resist. He threw them a steak and they couldn't help but pounce! And He and the team surely knew they would. I think they were area that there would be quite a response from MAGA as well. They are not dumb!

So what's going to happen here, is that the whole Epstein stuff will come out at the same time all the conspiracy stuff drops.

And what it is going to do is show that Trump personally is not part of the Pedo or any other of the nefarious aspects of Epstein. It will incriminate many on the left, and it will be a double whamy for them.

Wait and see.

lol, this sounds like something straight from the infamous QAnon thread.
I'm old enough to remember this poster as probably the single most prolific "contributor" to the Q thread, looks like old habits and beliefs die hard

trump will be dead and buried 10 years and we'll still be hearing "wait and see, this is all part of trump's master plan"


Imagine being one of the morons duped by QAnon, and having the gall to lecture people about "the way it is" just a few years later. And lol at him saying his "track record" is consistently right.
Reply Quote
flown-the-coop
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BBRex • 7:39p, 7/27/25
The is a series on a global pedo ring called "Operation Lost Boy" based on the case from Norway that expanded and went on for years.

You have to like subtitles but it was shocking, at least to me, the coordination and such that goes on in these pedo rings, including those in positions of power, be it small town power and such.

That said, I think the ability to actually cover these things up is much more difficult than people want to believe, especially once the "ring" has been exposed.

This thing may have some more twists or it may have peaked at Prince Andrew. At this point, release it all. Every detail, pic and video. Anything short of that leads to endless speculation.
Reply Quote
Richleau12
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 7:47p, 7/27/25
The problem, however, will be that regardless of the evidence declassified, there will be a great contingent that will never be satiated. First, you must protect those abused by this terrible scheme. Second, you must protect those that are innocent as we are a land governed by the rule of law. Third, because of these two obviously necessary steps, folks will never not clamor that the truth is being obfuscated even when they have no idea to the contrary.

It's a bad spot created by terrible people. The solution is there is not an adequate solution.
Reply Quote
Faustus
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ervin Burrell • 7:53p, 7/27/25
Ervin Burrell said:
Old McDonald said:
Ag CPA said:
OPAG said:
Let me tell ya how this is going to go.

Those that think Trump is stupid and impetuous and just fly's off the handle and has no ability to message or is just trying to CHA, are the same group that has been heavily gaslighted and programmed with TDS or they are the old guard Rino's seeking to divide the "Maga" camp.

Look at the timing of all this? Why did they have to even bring Epstein up at all at the time they did? You think it's just random coincidence? If you think that your are not very bright and have limited powers of critical / analytical thinking.

If you think the timing of the release of Bondi's message was just random, well, I don't know what to say.

And do you think Trump's response at the press meeting (as bad as it looked - was just a random melt down?

Again if you think that I can't help you.

Nothing done concerning this subject has been random or haphazard. They know this was a big deal to many in MAGA. Trump and team knew there was going to be a bruhah over the way he responded.

So what really happened here is that they drew the left into this. They can't resist. He threw them a steak and they couldn't help but pounce! And He and the team surely knew they would. I think they were area that there would be quite a response from MAGA as well. They are not dumb!

So what's going to happen here, is that the whole Epstein stuff will come out at the same time all the conspiracy stuff drops.

And what it is going to do is show that Trump personally is not part of the Pedo or any other of the nefarious aspects of Epstein. It will incriminate many on the left, and it will be a double whamy for them.

Wait and see.

lol, this sounds like something straight from the infamous QAnon thread.
I'm old enough to remember this poster as probably the single most prolific "contributor" to the Q thread, looks like old habits and beliefs die hard

trump will be dead and buried 10 years and we'll still be hearing "wait and see, this is all part of trump's master plan"


Imagine being one of the morons duped by QAnon, and having the gall to lecture people about "the way it is" just a few years later. And lol at him saying his "track record" is consistently right.


You don't hear much about the adrenochrome pedos anymore, but maybe they all kicked the habit.
Reply Quote
flown-the-coop
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:54p, 7/27/25
Evidently, according to most on here, they want the full exposure. So nothing should be redacted.

If people wanted justice, we could talk of protecting innocent, the non-accused and the victims.

But people are not seeking justice. So to satiate them, put it all out there and the public can decide what to do with it all.
Reply Quote
Richleau12
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Faustus • 12:54a, 7/28/25
Faustus said:
Ervin Burrell said:
Old McDonald said:
Ag CPA said:
OPAG said:
Let me tell ya how this is going to go.

Those that think Trump is stupid and impetuous and just fly's off the handle and has no ability to message or is just trying to CHA, are the same group that has been heavily gaslighted and programmed with TDS or they are the old guard Rino's seeking to divide the "Maga" camp.

Look at the timing of all this? Why did they have to even bring Epstein up at all at the time they did? You think it's just random coincidence? If you think that your are not very bright and have limited powers of critical / analytical thinking.

If you think the timing of the release of Bondi's message was just random, well, I don't know what to say.

And do you think Trump's response at the press meeting (as bad as it looked - was just a random melt down?

Again if you think that I can't help you.

Nothing done concerning this subject has been random or haphazard. They know this was a big deal to many in MAGA. Trump and team knew there was going to be a bruhah over the way he responded.

So what really happened here is that they drew the left into this. They can't resist. He threw them a steak and they couldn't help but pounce! And He and the team surely knew they would. I think they were area that there would be quite a response from MAGA as well. They are not dumb!

So what's going to happen here, is that the whole Epstein stuff will come out at the same time all the conspiracy stuff drops.

And what it is going to do is show that Trump personally is not part of the Pedo or any other of the nefarious aspects of Epstein. It will incriminate many on the left, and it will be a double whamy for them.

Wait and see.

lol, this sounds like something straight from the infamous QAnon thread.
I'm old enough to remember this poster as probably the single most prolific "contributor" to the Q thread, looks like old habits and beliefs die hard

trump will be dead and buried 10 years and we'll still be hearing "wait and see, this is all part of trump's master plan"


Imagine being one of the morons duped by QAnon, and having the gall to lecture people about "the way it is" just a few years later. And lol at him saying his "track record" is consistently right.


You don't hear much about the adrenochrome pedos anymore, but maybe they all kicked the habit.


And yet folks that followed Q (there is no Qanon) knew about Epstein long before anyone else. Pizzagate is another interesting rabbit hole to go down. Again, people love to disparage but many of these recent revelations have been discussed, researched and forwarded by Q and folks that researched the subjects broached. Any fair minded person can see that. Heck, here's a great way to carefully examine the validity of my statements. Staff, bring back the Q thread. I mean, why was it removed in the first place? Texags worried they would be shut down? Tigerdroppings pulled their Q thread nearly the same week. Interesting timing!
Reply Quote
nortex97
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Juan Lee Pettimore • 3:52a, 7/28/25
Juan Lee Pettimore said:
You liberals still have not addressed the single most important question in this saga. "Why didn't they get released earlier when the left had control?"

Someone said earlier "cause they wanted to protect Bill Clinton" which might be the single most ridiculous proclamation in all of this. There is literally no way they wouldn't have expended Bill Clinton as collateral damage if it meant stopping Trump. I mean, literally no freaking way.

OBAMA's ENTIRE FREAKING ADMINISTRATION COLLUDED AND CONSPIRED TO INVENT SOME NON-SENSICAL RUSSIA HOAX, EXPOSING ALL OF THEM TO TREASON AND SEDITION CHARGES AND A LIFETIME IN PRISON IF CAUGHT!

But hurting Bill Clinton was a line they weren't willing to cross?????

My God liberals are pathetic.

I agree on all of that. Then, I would note the Rogan-Mike Baker talk I listened to this weekend covered some of the inanity of Kash's claims about the 'suicide' and broken neck bones/lack of tapes/missing segments of the footage etc. Of course, Rogan is defensive about being a passive interviewer with Kash, but that's just who he is.

It just doesn't add up in my little brain, but maybe for some reason they are setting it up as such to then release it more completely? I don't know, as it just doesn't pass common sense to make the claims/support all of this, and that has nothing to do with whatever lies democrats are now saying (the latter have zero credibility of course on this topic or any other).
Reply Quote
austinAG90
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:48a, 7/28/25
Looking for the money from arms deals. https://www.forbes.com/sites/giacomotognini/2025/07/25/how-jeffrey-epstein-got-so-rich/
Reply Quote
HTownAg98
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:06a, 7/28/25

So the reason Trump got pissed at Epstein was…poaching?
Reply Quote
flown-the-coop
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to HTownAg98 • 11:13a, 7/28/25
Even more evidence he had nothing to do with Epsteins pedo side. Were you expecting something different?

He also said he doesn't drawn pics unless someone asks him to draw a basic building and that he has never drawn a cartoon of a woman.

Remember when Trump was supposedly ripping up post it notes and flushing them and people wanted him to hang for destroying presidential records and undermining White House plumbing? Cause that's about where this story is at now.
Reply Quote
J. Walter Weatherman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:23a, 7/28/25
Bill Clinton went to the island 28 times but he's not in the Epstein files? Why is Trump protecting him? Also calling it a "privilege" to go to a notorious sex offender's island. More of that exceptional Trump communication skills I guess.

Reply Quote
Look Out Below
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:25a, 7/28/25
Reply Quote
Rockdoc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to HTownAg98 • 11:26a, 7/28/25
You libs crack me up. This has become a comedy thread. But you guys keep trying!
Reply Quote
Look Out Below
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:29a, 7/28/25
In a follow-up question, Epstein was asked, "Have you ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18?"
Reply Quote
OPAG
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:30a, 7/28/25
"only one thing is important!"
Reply Quote
No Spin Ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to OPAG • 11:33a, 7/28/25
OPAG said:


Even more reason to release everything that doesn't include children and victims.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Reply Quote
flown-the-coop
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to J. Walter Weatherman • 11:35a, 7/28/25
Most consider getting flown by private jet to a private island to be a privilege.

But if all you hear is "it's a privilege to get flown on Lolita express to a secret island to rape underage girls for a weekend", then maybe TDS has spread to other areas.

Oh, and it's seems you have nothing to say about Clinton going 28 times. Just that Trump said the word "privilege".

Too funny.
Reply Quote
The Fall Guy
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:36a, 7/28/25
Yea this is ridiculous at this point for anyone to believe govt at this point.
Reply Quote
The Fall Guy
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rockdoc • 11:38a, 7/28/25
Rockdoc said:
You libs crack me up. This has become a comedy thread. But you guys keep trying!


Funny you think its just libs. Keep up with the ball licking of party over truth.
Reply Quote
1 edit
J. Walter Weatherman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 11:38a, 7/28/25
Trump seems to be the one with no issue with Clinton going 28 times since he apparently won't release all of the files showing how much Clinton and others were involved. The rest of us want all of the information released.
Reply Quote
flown-the-coop
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to No Spin Ag • 11:39a, 7/28/25
No Spin Ag said:
OPAG said:


Even more reason to release everything that doesn't include children and victims.


Negative. Release it all, no redactions.

If this is so serious that it continues to eat up the airtime, then nothing remains secret.

Else we get "Jane Doe #3 between the age of 14-17 at the alleged date of the incident, says she met Trump at (location redacted for privacy of victim) during the late 1990s (victim could not identify exact date due to trauma during that time)….".

So no, nothing gets redacted. If you want the information that bad, then you deal with the fallout.
Reply Quote
flown-the-coop
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to J. Walter Weatherman • 11:41a, 7/28/25
J. Walter Weatherman said:
Trump seems to be the one with no issue with Clinton going 28 times since he apparently won't release all of the files showing how much Clinton and others were involved. The rest of us want all of the information released.


Rest easy. You will get the videotape of Bill raping young girls that you desire so much. That is what you are looking for, right?

Do you have information on what documents Trump has instructed the DOJ not to release?
Reply Quote
aggiegolfer2012
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 11:42a, 7/28/25
flown-the-coop said:
No Spin Ag said:
OPAG said:


Even more reason to release everything that doesn't include children and victims.


Negative. Release it all, no redactions.

If this is so serious that it continues to eat up the airtime, then nothing remains secret.

Else we get "Jane Doe #3 between the age of 14-17 at the alleged date of the incident, says she met Trump at (location redacted for privacy of victim) during the late 1990s (victim could not identify exact date due to trauma during that time)….".

So no, nothing gets redacted. If you want the information that bad, then you deal with the fallout.


So basically if the claims are about the cult leader, you demand victim names and details. But if not, you'll just believe them because dear leader said so.
Reply Quote
flown-the-coop
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiegolfer2012 • 11:46a, 7/28/25
I am not sure what you are referring to about cult leader.

But yes, in America, where I live, one has a right to confront the accuser. We cannot continue to convict on vague accusations from decades ago where the accuser can hide behind vagueness, poor memory and such.

Before you continue to make such poor comments regarding some sort of cult leader, maybe learn why grand jury testimony remains secret. It's not to protect the victims.
Reply Quote
f1ghtintexasaggie
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 11:48a, 7/28/25
flown-the-coop said:
J. Walter Weatherman said:
Trump seems to be the one with no issue with Clinton going 28 times since he apparently won't release all of the files showing how much Clinton and others were involved. The rest of us want all of the information released.


Rest easy. You will get the videotape of Bill raping young girls that you desire so much. That is what you are looking for, right?

Do you have information on what documents Trump has instructed the DOJ not to release?


Christ, this is psychotic. No one, literally NO ****ING PERSON has said they wanted this. You are making **** up, for what? Your goal-tending of this issue has been disgraceful and disgusting. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Reply Quote
Look Out Below
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 11:53a, 7/28/25
Agree 100%
Reply Quote
J. Walter Weatherman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 11:55a, 7/28/25
What a weird response.

Trump's DOJ has said there is no list and nothing to release. So it would stand to reason that if there is proof of Clinton and others' involvement, it's being withheld. Especially considering how much Trump and co talked about releasing all information during the campaign.

The alternative is that there is no involvement from anyone besides Epstein and Maxwell.
Reply Quote
HTownAg98
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Rockdoc • 11:59a, 7/28/25
Rockdoc said:
You libs crack me up. This has become a comedy thread. But you guys keep trying!

If he'd said "I banned Jeff from Mar-a-Lago because I found out he was raping teenage girls," that would be an excellent reason, and help buttress the idea that a lot of people here have, including myself, that he wasn't a part of any of Epstein's sex trafficking crimes.

Did you miss the part where I said that I don't believe Trump was involved with Epstein's sex trafficking gambit, or did you ignore that so you can play some ridiculous game of Gotcha that you are evidently not very good at?
Reply Quote
flown-the-coop
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to f1ghtintexasaggie • 12:00p, 7/28/25
f1ghtintexasaggie said:
flown-the-coop said:
J. Walter Weatherman said:
Trump seems to be the one with no issue with Clinton going 28 times since he apparently won't release all of the files showing how much Clinton and others were involved. The rest of us want all of the information released.


Rest easy. You will get the videotape of Bill raping young girls that you desire so much. That is what you are looking for, right?

Do you have information on what documents Trump has instructed the DOJ not to release?


Christ, this is psychotic. No one, literally NO ****ING PERSON has said they wanted this. You are making **** up, for what? Your goal-tending of this issue has been disgraceful and disgusting. You should be ashamed of yourself.


Not at all. None of you Epstein Files fanaticals seem to be able to articulate what your goal is other than "release the files". So I am left with offering you options of what you are looking for.

What goal-tending is being done by saying to release it all? That would seem to be the opposite of goal-tending.

So that leaves the option of letting Trump and his DOJ continue to go through the process and release things determine to be factual or factually supported, to withhold things that are part of ongoing investigations (if any), and to release other information that has been subjected to DOJ factchecking and redaction. Or the option of releasing files as is, which violates tremendously the rights of the accused if victims names and other "innocents" are withheld.

Just be honest about what you really want here. Again, I say release every single file there is and ever was. But yet I am goal tending and psychotic? Check a mirror bruh.
Reply Quote
flown-the-coop
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to J. Walter Weatherman • 12:02p, 7/28/25
J. Walter Weatherman said:
What a weird response.

Trump's DOJ has said there is no list and nothing to release. So it would stand to reason that if there is proof of Clinton and others' involvement, it's being withheld. Especially considering how much Trump and co talked about releasing all information during the campaign.

The alternative is that there is no involvement from anyone besides Epstein and Maxwell.


So you do want to see the "proof" on Clinton, which is what I insinuated you were after.

Just admit what you want, it's not that hard.
Reply Quote
K2-HMFIC
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to K2-HMFIC • 12:18p, 7/28/25
K2-HMFIC said:
K2-HMFIC said:
How long before Maxwell gets pardoned?





Over Under - 1 Sept


https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/28/trump-ghislaine-maxwell-pardon-jeffrey-epstein-00479862

Looks like we need to be taking the under.
Reply Quote
No Spin Ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 12:20p, 7/28/25
flown-the-coop said:
No Spin Ag said:
OPAG said:


Even more reason to release everything that doesn't include children and victims.


Negative. Release it all, no redactions.

If this is so serious that it continues to eat up the airtime, then nothing remains secret.

Else we get "Jane Doe #3 between the age of 14-17 at the alleged date of the incident, says she met Trump at (location redacted for privacy of victim) during the late 1990s (victim could not identify exact date due to trauma during that time)….".

So no, nothing gets redacted. If you want the information that bad, then you deal with the fallout.

So you want to ruin even further the lives of victims just to thumb the nose at those who want nothing but the names, places, and horrible things they did regarding all things Epstein?

You do realize everything (names, etc.) that can put those involved in public light, and likely in jail, can be done without causing further trauma to the victims, right?

I don't think anyone is saying to show the videos, pictures, and names of the victims. At least not those who just want the names, whichever names they may be..
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Reply Quote
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to K2-HMFIC • 12:21p, 7/28/25
Same answer as when you posted Friday



Quote:
Over. Easy.


Sorry bud, its not happening, and especially not before Sept 1.

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
J. Walter Weatherman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to flown-the-coop • 12:23p, 7/28/25
flown-the-coop said:
J. Walter Weatherman said:
What a weird response.

Trump's DOJ has said there is no list and nothing to release. So it would stand to reason that if there is proof of Clinton and others' involvement, it's being withheld. Especially considering how much Trump and co talked about releasing all information during the campaign.

The alternative is that there is no involvement from anyone besides Epstein and Maxwell.


So you do want to see the "proof" on Clinton, which is what I insinuated you were after.

Just admit what you want, it's not that hard.


You understand that an investigation like this would have thousands of documents, interviews on file, background research, summary findings, etc right? Trump's DOJ hasn't said "we're still working on it." They said there's nothing left to investigate and for everyone to move on. If he's going to insinuate Clinton and others are involved then release the evidence from the investigation that implicates them. Otherwise he's no better than the dems who are implying Trump was involved with no evidence to back it up.

I'm not sure why your mind immediately went to the only thing that can be released is videos of the victims but that probably says more about you than anything else.
Reply Quote
flown-the-coop
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to No Spin Ag • 12:24p, 7/28/25
I didn't call for the publishing of the victims names or any of videos and photos of such.

I said release it. Whether it's published it's not up to me or on me.

But if you release anything you release it all. Else you do nothing to end the ongoing speculation. See my example above on "redacted" releases.
Reply Quote
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.