****** The Official Houston Texans Thread 2025 ******

76,815 Views | 969 Replies | Last: 7 hrs ago by Drunken Overseas Bettor
Diggity
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agreed. I guess he loves these silly cases because he knows he'll get free media attention but he comes off as such an idiot in the interviews.
Buck Compton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Didn't Cary already lose in court trying to fight for ownership? Now he's saying he lost because of conspiracy?

He got the business, Cal got the franchise. Thought that was pretty clear…
Snake Jazz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agstro said:

I agree that he inherited a tough situation, but lots of missed opportunities and mistakes to go along with some good choices. I think he is very average and we can do much better. He doesn't prioritize explosive playmakers (see RB room). He doesn't know how to pick o-lineman. He couldn't help a rookie defensive minded coach put together a competent coaching staff on offense. He gets worked in draft pick trades constantly. I am just not impressed at all. I think the Cully, Easterby, Lovie fiasco falls in his lap and responsibility. He has done some nice things, but in my view the bad equals or outweighs the good. We could do much better.


He doesn't prioritize playmakers?

Drafted Nico. Drafted Tank. Traded for Diggs. Traded for Mixon. Obviously, we've had bad luck with injuries, but he has added playmakers.

Can't argue with offensive line, but Green, Scruggs and Fisher were all picked near where they were projected. Coaching and lack of development are factors here. We'll see how Ersery does, but he already looks more promising than the others.

He gets worked in draft trades? He gave up a lot to get Will, but can you point to anything outside of that? If anything, I love his style of compiling picks as ammo to move up when they see a player they like.

I agree that the Culley hire was a disaster, but Easterby was here before Nick, and he didn't last long once Nick got here.

I really don't want my GM telling my coach who he can hire for his staff.

Respectfully, I just disagree. Caserio has gotten it right more often than not.
Agstro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ya, we just disagree. No worries. I just think Caserio is very average. I think he overpays in draft capital in trades and often under delivers in the picks he makes. And I think he overpays mediocre vets also.

We don't have a RB with jet speed. We drafted Tank which is nice but obviously risky given his frame. No, I do not think he has added explosive playmakers to this team in a meaningful way except Nico.

Fine to disagree here, but I definitely think we could do better. (And I think he allowed the Easterby nightmare to last longer than it should have. )
Texan_Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Culley was a stop gap, needed a coach to embrace the tank and no good up and coming young coach would want that. Lovie was hired because the Texans got sued by Flores. Easterby was previous regime and Caserio got rid of him.

He needs to hit on offense, which may happen depending upon what happens with the Iowa State guys.

He has been bad at drafting OL, but even the Bears showed that you can go spend a ton of money and sign good OL players, but it may take a bit for it to come into form.
JCA1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agstro said:

Ya, we just disagree. No worries. I just think Caserio is very average. I think he overpays in draft capital in trades and often under delivers in the picks he makes. And I think he overpays mediocre vets also.

We don't have a RB with jet speed. We drafted Tank which is nice but obviously risky given his frame. No, I do not think he has added explosive playmakers to this team in a meaningful way except Nico.

Fine to disagree here, but I definitely think we could do better. (And I think he allowed the Easterby nightmare to last longer than it should have. )


Tank's first injury was on the coaches, IMO. Having a 180 lb WR in the middle of a goal line scrum was the dumbest decision ever. Whoever drew that play up should be exiled to the Big 12.
Texan_Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I rewatched some of the game, our offense actually did some pretty good things and it's apparent that there's just a lot of "new" everywhere. It will take a bit of time to gel together. They had a total of 3 players starting at the same position as last year with a new rookie OC. I'll be more concerned if by week 4/5 we're not scoring more TDs, but I never get too high or low after week 1.

2024
QB - Stroud
RB - Mixon
WR - Collins
WR - Dell
WR - Diggs
TE - Schultz
LT - Tunsil
LG - Green
C - Scruggs
RG - Mason
RT - Howard

2025
QB - Stroud
RB - Chubb
WR - Collins
WR - Higgins
TE - Schultz
TE - Stover
LT - Robinson
LG - Tomlinson
C - Andrew
RG - Howard
RT - Ersery
Noble07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Snake Jazz said:

He gets worked in draft trades? He gave up a lot to get Will, but can you point to anything outside of that? If anything, I love his style of compiling picks as ammo to move up when they see a player they like.




He gave a 2nd rd pick to Buffalo for just one year of Stefon Diggs. The injury was unfortunate, but why give up so much for 1 year? Caserio shortened Diggs deal to 1 year after trading for him.
Agstro
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Noble07 said:

Snake Jazz said:

He gets worked in draft trades? He gave up a lot to get Will, but can you point to anything outside of that? If anything, I love his style of compiling picks as ammo to move up when they see a player they like.




He gave a 2nd rd pick to Buffalo for just one year of Stefon Diggs. The injury was unfortunate, but why give up so much for 1 year? Caserio shortened Diggs deal to 1 year after trading for him.


Exactly. I think he overpays on draft pick trades maneuvering on draft day. And then Eagles and Ravens pick who we could have picked by staying put.
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ultimately the problem with the o-line...

it's preventing the Texans from making a legitimate evaluation of Stroud in regard to a second contract
Snake Jazz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Noble07 said:

Snake Jazz said:

He gets worked in draft trades? He gave up a lot to get Will, but can you point to anything outside of that? If anything, I love his style of compiling picks as ammo to move up when they see a player they like.




He gave a 2nd rd pick to Buffalo for just one year of Stefon Diggs. The injury was unfortunate, but why give up so much for 1 year? Caserio shortened Diggs deal to 1 year after trading for him.

Yeah, I didn't understand giving up a second rounder for one year of Diggs, either. However, if he stays healthy and leads us to the Super Bowl, nobody is complaining. They gambled that Diggs was that guy and they missed.
Snake Jazz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agstro said:

Noble07 said:

Snake Jazz said:

He gets worked in draft trades? He gave up a lot to get Will, but can you point to anything outside of that? If anything, I love his style of compiling picks as ammo to move up when they see a player they like.




He gave a 2nd rd pick to Buffalo for just one year of Stefon Diggs. The injury was unfortunate, but why give up so much for 1 year? Caserio shortened Diggs deal to 1 year after trading for him.


Exactly. I think he overpays on draft pick trades maneuvering on draft day. And then Eagles and Ravens pick who we could have picked by staying put.

The past two years he has traded out of the first, added another draft pick, and then drafted the guy they likely would have taken in the first round anyways. Lassiter looks like a steal. Let's see how Higgins ends up, but early buzz is good.

He trades up a lot, but he also trades back if he feels comfortable about the player they can get later.
MelvinUdall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Outside of his drafting/development of OL, he has done a good job of drafting.
Drunken Overseas Bettor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First Weekly Texans Bingo Update

I guess I should have made "Texans don't score a touchdown vs the Rams" into a category c'est la vie

Your early leaders in the clubhouse are: Snake Jazz, the aptly-named AlwaysNextYear89, and myself for having the confidence to predict the loss. We all have 2 squares, everybody else has 1.

A brief rundown of the Texans, and the rest. The picks and the progress are always available to view here

TEXANS
As you would expect in a 14-9 loss, a lot of sleepy offense. Only Dalton Schultz, aka "TexAgs Mr. Popularity" got anywhere close to the numbers he'll need to hit his bingo squares.

The defense recovered a fumble. 1 down, 13 to go!

OVER/UNDERS
After keeping an eye on Colts-Dolphins all day because I have Tyler Warren in FFL, my only question is: How soon, and how frequently can the Texans play the Dolphins, because holy **** they looked terrible.

AGS AROUND THE WORLD
AChane, who now I just want to call A-Train after binging the first 3 seasons of "The Boys", got 55 yards. It's sort of nuts to think that 17 games of 55 yards gets you 935 yards rushing.

Big Boy Myles with 2 sacks vs the Bengals. Makes 14 look very doable.

STAT MATCHUPS
Big personal shoutout to Joe Burrow, my dynasty league starting quarterback, for cranking out 113 yard like he's on the GD 7th grade B team.

Derrick Henry off to a solid pace of 2,873 rushing yards and 34 rushing touchdowns.

Justin Jefferson and Jamaar Chase combined for 70 yards receiving this week. I watched Monday night's game wondering how long before JJ asks for a trade, even though they did win.


Relevant Week 2 Matchups
Jags at Bengals
Giants at Cowboys
Rams at Titans
Broncos at Colts
Bucs at Texans MNF

JCA1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Caserio has done a decent to good job, especially considering what he started with. As others have said, his inability to assemble an OL and the Diggs trade are the 2 main questionable decisions he's had. But he has done a good job assembling a roster with those exceptions. However, it'll all be for naught if he doesn't figure out the OL asap.
LB12Diamond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
W said:

ultimately the problem with the o-line...

it's preventing the Texans from making a legitimate evaluation of Stroud in regard to a second contract

It will be clear this or next year prior to doing anything crazy.
LB12Diamond
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was busy last weekend. Why did Kirk not play?
Tx_Aggie15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hamstring issue I believe
Max Power
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LB12Diamond said:

W said:

ultimately the problem with the o-line...

it's preventing the Texans from making a legitimate evaluation of Stroud in regard to a second contract

It will be clear this or next year prior to doing anything crazy.

I'm curious how Caserio is going to handle the Stroud and WAJ extensions since they are both eligible for extensions after this season. It's pretty clear what WAJ is so it's a bit easier to calculate his contract than Stroud's. Just looking at Over The Cap edge rushers there's only 3 at or over $40MM/year which are Parsons, Watt, and Garrett but at no. 4 is Hunter at $35.6MM/season. I'm guessing he gets around Hunter's number but has more guaranteed money because Hunter is 31. Regardless of what happens with Stroud the WAJ extension gets done next offseason.

When I initially started this I thought QB was going to be trickier because of the sheer amount of money involved, but I actually don't think that's true. If Trevor Lawrence is getting $55MM/season then Stroud is getting at least that figure, also making $55MM/season are Burrow, Allen, and Love. Lawrence and the Jags won the AFC South and a playoff game the season before Stroud was drafted and I don't see how Houston comes to an agreement for less money than Trevor Lawrence is making in the same division. He might not be on the level of Burrow or Allen but there's zero chance Houston pays Stroud less than Lawrence. Lawrence getting $142MM guaranteed makes no sense to me though, that might be the only tricky part is agreeing on the guaranteed number.
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
the worst thing a franchise can do is give a second contract to an average or slightly above average QB

and there are many, many, many examples (past and present) of this. (Lawrence, Dak, Kyler, et al...)

it keeps a franchise stuck in "good" but never "great"
OPAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I meant to put Miles > 14 sacks and clicked the wrong one, So I will add

Miles Garret> 14 sacks. So at least I will get one right. besides Cowboys suck LOL
JCA1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
W said:

the worst thing a franchise can do is give a second contract to an average or slightly above average QB

and there are many, many, many examples (past and present) of this. (Lawrence, Dak, Kyler, et al...)

it keeps a franchise stuck in "good" but never "great"


And just when I was finally able to forget about Matt Schaub, you bring this up.
Pahdz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The only thing that makes me feel somewhat better about CJ if we don't extend is it's not like we're looking back at some superstar QB we took him over.

Put me in the no camp at the moment, for the reasons you stated.
OPAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mike Evans had 51 yards. receiving, just a little below the average he needs to get to 1000. He now needs to average about 60 a game to get there. Definitely do able.
Drunken Overseas Bettor
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OPAG said:

Mike Evans had 51 yards. receiving, just a little below the average he needs to get to 1000. He now needs to average about 60 a game to get there. Definitely do able.

Definitely, I should have included that. I'll get you guys squares updated in the next 24 hours. I have a huge project due tomorrow morning that I sort of forgot about that I need to get done first
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.