flown-the-coop said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

I can say I don't support Pedos. All pedos must be eradicated. Those that defending not releasing the full list well....

---

---

---

---

That's certainly quite the take. "Wanting to see evidence which shines light on/exposes child rapists so they can be held accountable is just as bad as ****ing children." What a warped opinion, all because you're trying to defend a guy who wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire.

---

You really want to watch the videos? Yes. that is sick to me.

Nah, you just want to see the names so you can figure out your political spin on it.

I notice a lot of you folks are not necessary calling for justice, but are calling for exposure of names and other conspiracies.

I still have not seen one person join me in questioning where the parents and guardians are who are equally accountable for sending their children to pedo playgrounds.

I believe the original charges on Epstein actually resulted from the mother of a girl whose friend took her to Epstein without the parent's permission or knowing. If you wanted justice, you would clamor for accountability there.

But you don't. Why?

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

You are full of hot takes this morning, and all of them are embarrassing...again, because you're desperately trying to defend an egomaniac who couldn't care less about you.

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

I can say I don't support Pedos. All pedos must be eradicated. Those that defending not releasing the full list well....

---

---

---

---

That's certainly quite the take. "Wanting to see evidence which shines light on/exposes child rapists so they can be held accountable is just as bad as ****ing children." What a warped opinion, all because you're trying to defend a guy who wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire.

---

You really want to watch the videos? Yes. that is sick to me.

Nah, you just want to see the names so you can figure out your political spin on it.

I notice a lot of you folks are not necessary calling for justice, but are calling for exposure of names and other conspiracies.

I still have not seen one person join me in questioning where the parents and guardians are who are equally accountable for sending their children to pedo playgrounds.

I believe the original charges on Epstein actually resulted from the mother of a girl whose friend took her to Epstein without the parent's permission or knowing. If you wanted justice, you would clamor for accountability there.

But you don't. Why?

---

Jesus Christ, where/when did I say that? The fact that's where your mind goes when you hear somebody says "let's see the evidence" is...disturbing. There's a universe of difference between wanting to know names or see evidence and watching a video of it happening...dafuq is wrong with you?

And yes, the parents of the kids are the real bad guys here.

You are full of hot takes this morning, and all of them are embarrassing...again, because you're desperately trying to defend an egomaniac who couldn't care less about you.

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

I can say I don't support Pedos. All pedos must be eradicated. Those that defending not releasing the full list well....

---

---

---

---

That's certainly quite the take. "Wanting to see evidence which shines light on/exposes child rapists so they can be held accountable is just as bad as ****ing children." What a warped opinion, all because you're trying to defend a guy who wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire.

---

You really want to watch the videos? Yes. that is sick to me.

Nah, you just want to see the names so you can figure out your political spin on it.

I notice a lot of you folks are not necessary calling for justice, but are calling for exposure of names and other conspiracies.

I still have not seen one person join me in questioning where the parents and guardians are who are equally accountable for sending their children to pedo playgrounds.

I believe the original charges on Epstein actually resulted from the mother of a girl whose friend took her to Epstein without the parent's permission or knowing. If you wanted justice, you would clamor for accountability there.

But you don't. Why?

---

Jesus Christ, where/when did I say that? The fact that's where your mind goes when you hear somebody says "let's see the evidence" is...disturbing. There's a universe of difference between wanting to know names or see evidence and watching a video of it happening...dafuq is wrong with you?

And yes, the parents of the kids are the real bad guys here.

You are full of hot takes this morning, and all of them are embarrassing...again, because you're desperately trying to defend an egomaniac who couldn't care less about you.

---

So you want to see names and evidence? Has that ever happened before in a criminal matter?

I still have a fundamental misunderstanding of what the end goal is here. Seeing names of people who haven't been convicted or even charged? Seeing who associated with Epstein?

What is the desired end goal?

---

FWTXAg said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

I can say I don't support Pedos. All pedos must be eradicated. Those that defending not releasing the full list well....

---

---

---

---

That's certainly quite the take. "Wanting to see evidence which shines light on/exposes child rapists so they can be held accountable is just as bad as ****ing children." What a warped opinion, all because you're trying to defend a guy who wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire.

---

You really want to watch the videos? Yes. that is sick to me.

Nah, you just want to see the names so you can figure out your political spin on it.

I notice a lot of you folks are not necessary calling for justice, but are calling for exposure of names and other conspiracies.

I still have not seen one person join me in questioning where the parents and guardians are who are equally accountable for sending their children to pedo playgrounds.

I believe the original charges on Epstein actually resulted from the mother of a girl whose friend took her to Epstein without the parent's permission or knowing. If you wanted justice, you would clamor for accountability there.

But you don't. Why?

---

Jesus Christ, where/when did I say that? The fact that's where your mind goes when you hear somebody says "let's see the evidence" is...disturbing. There's a universe of difference between wanting to know names or see evidence and watching a video of it happening...dafuq is wrong with you?

And yes, the parents of the kids are the real bad guys here.

You are full of hot takes this morning, and all of them are embarrassing...again, because you're desperately trying to defend an egomaniac who couldn't care less about you.

---

So you want to see names and evidence? Has that ever happened before in a criminal matter?

I still have a fundamental misunderstanding of what the end goal is here. Seeing names of people who haven't been convicted or even charged? Seeing who associated with Epstein?

What is the desired end goal?

---

Finding out who associated with Epstein, and to what extent, would be a start. Great idea why hasn't anyone else thought of that?

We'll get to the CIA and Mossad next.

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Ship says lawsuit incoming....

Trump is going to sue the WSJ - just like he sued CBS and ABC.

— Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) July 18, 2025

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

Who knew MAGA was so pedophile enabling?

---

aginlakeway said:

---

FWTXAg said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

I can say I don't support Pedos. All pedos must be eradicated. Those that defending not releasing the full list well....

---

---

---

---

That's certainly quite the take. "Wanting to see evidence which shines light on/exposes child rapists so they can be held accountable is just as bad as ****ing children." What a warped opinion, all because you're trying to defend a guy who wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire.

---

You really want to watch the videos? Yes. that is sick to me.

Nah, you just want to see the names so you can figure out your political spin on it.

I notice a lot of you folks are not necessary calling for justice, but are calling for exposure of names and other conspiracies.

I still have not seen one person join me in questioning where the parents and guardians are who are equally accountable for sending their children to pedo playgrounds.

I believe the original charges on Epstein actually resulted from the mother of a girl whose friend took her to Epstein without the parent's permission or knowing. If you wanted justice, you would clamor for accountability there.

But you don't. Why?

---

Jesus Christ, where/when did I say that? The fact that's where your mind goes when you hear somebody says "let's see the evidence" is...disturbing. There's a universe of difference between wanting to know names or see evidence and watching a video of it happening...dafuq is wrong with you?

And yes, the parents of the kids are the real bad guys here.

You are full of hot takes this morning, and all of them are embarrassing...again, because you're desperately trying to defend an egomaniac who couldn't care less about you.

---

So you want to see names and evidence? Has that ever happened before in a criminal matter?

I still have a fundamental misunderstanding of what the end goal is here. Seeing names of people who haven't been convicted or even charged? Seeing who associated with Epstein?

What is the desired end goal?

---

Finding out who associated with Epstein, and to what extent, would be a start. Great idea why hasn't anyone else thought of that?

We'll get to the CIA and Mossad next.

---

So you want the public to be given the list of who associated with Epstein, and to what extent?

Is it legal to release that? How is that not an invasion of privacy? Is it really the publicist business?

I hate what Epstein and others do. But the solution isn't to release all the name of all his associates. I'd wager most of them didn't do anything wrong.

I'm unsure about releasing names when there's no proof that those names being released did anything wrong. That seems backwards to me.

IMO.

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

Who knew MAGA was so pedophile enabling?

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

Oh look, aginlakeway is "just asking questions" and trying to bait people into stupid ass wagers. Must be a day that ends in 'y'.

---

japantiger said:

---

Some of you guys have pretty poor pattern recognition skills...the Never Trumper WSJ publishes unsourced salacious story that seems as believable as all the other Never Trump stories they've published in the last 10 years; and you just gobble it up...

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

Who knew MAGA was so pedophile enabling?

---

FYI ... I do a lot of work with an abused women's shelter in HB. And many were abused as minors.

I am about as anti-pedophile as they com. But I am also against the innocent being treated like they were guilty.

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

Who knew MAGA was so pedophile enabling?

---

FYI ... I do a lot of work with an abused women's shelter in HB. And many were abused as minors.

I am about as anti-pedophile as they com. But I am also against the innocent being treated like they were guilty.

---

Good thing that's not what people are asking for.

---

FWTXAg said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

FWTXAg said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

The Fall Guy said:

---

I can say I don't support Pedos. All pedos must be eradicated. Those that defending not releasing the full list well....

---

---

---

---

That's certainly quite the take. "Wanting to see evidence which shines light on/exposes child rapists so they can be held accountable is just as bad as ****ing children." What a warped opinion, all because you're trying to defend a guy who wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire.

---

You really want to watch the videos? Yes. that is sick to me.

Nah, you just want to see the names so you can figure out your political spin on it.

I notice a lot of you folks are not necessary calling for justice, but are calling for exposure of names and other conspiracies.

I still have not seen one person join me in questioning where the parents and guardians are who are equally accountable for sending their children to pedo playgrounds.

I believe the original charges on Epstein actually resulted from the mother of a girl whose friend took her to Epstein without the parent's permission or knowing. If you wanted justice, you would clamor for accountability there.

But you don't. Why?

---

Jesus Christ, where/when did I say that? The fact that's where your mind goes when you hear somebody says "let's see the evidence" is...disturbing. There's a universe of difference between wanting to know names or see evidence and watching a video of it happening...dafuq is wrong with you?

And yes, the parents of the kids are the real bad guys here.

You are full of hot takes this morning, and all of them are embarrassing...again, because you're desperately trying to defend an egomaniac who couldn't care less about you.

---

So you want to see names and evidence? Has that ever happened before in a criminal matter?

I still have a fundamental misunderstanding of what the end goal is here. Seeing names of people who haven't been convicted or even charged? Seeing who associated with Epstein?

What is the desired end goal?

---

Finding out who associated with Epstein, and to what extent, would be a start. Great idea why hasn't anyone else thought of that?

We'll get to the CIA and Mossad next.

---

So you want the public to be given the list of who associated with Epstein, and to what extent?

Is it legal to release that? How is that not an invasion of privacy? Is it really the publicist business?

I hate what Epstein and others do. But the solution isn't to release all the name of all his associates. I'd wager most of them didn't do anything wrong.

I'm unsure about releasing names when there's no proof that those names being released did anything wrong. That seems backwards to me.

IMO.

---

Yeah. They're not going to just start hanging Epsteins innocent friends for no reason.


The FBI and CIA know every single thing Jeffrey Epstein has ever done.

If I started planning a Revolution tomorrow the intelligence agencies would have an Encyclopedia written about my entire history and life and they'd make sure they stopped me before I even got started.

Where is the Epstein Encyclopedia?

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

Who knew MAGA was so pedophile enabling?

---

FYI ... I do a lot of work with an abused women's shelter in HB. And many were abused as minors.

I am about as anti-pedophile as they com. But I am also against the innocent being treated like they were guilty.

---

Good thing that's not what people are asking for.

---

So what are people asking for?

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

Who knew MAGA was so pedophile enabling?

---

FYI ... I do a lot of work with an abused women's shelter in HB. And many were abused as minors.

I am about as anti-pedophile as they com. But I am also against the innocent being treated like they were guilty.

---

Good thing that's not what people are asking for.

---

So what are people asking for?

---

Jesus you're insufferable.

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

They will say the desired goal is to stop pedos.

But the real desire is either to get off on conspiracy theories or to enjoy some sort of take down of public figures so they can talk about it on the internet.

The fact they don't clamor first for justice but instead to see names and evidence tells you what you need to know.

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

Who knew MAGA was so pedophile enabling?

---

FYI ... I do a lot of work with an abused women's shelter in HB. And many were abused as minors.

I am about as anti-pedophile as they com. But I am also against the innocent being treated like they were guilty.

---

Good thing that's not what people are asking for.

---

So what are people asking for?

---

Jesus you're insufferable.

---

Then block me.

Asking what people want to see if not a crazy question. Sorry. I am sincerely unaware of what specifically people want to see.

The "files" ... what does that mean? Do they want to see list of associates? Every piece of paper from prior investigations?

Me ... I want those who broke the law to get convicted and sent away.

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

Who knew MAGA was so pedophile enabling?

---

FYI ... I do a lot of work with an abused women's shelter in HB. And many were abused as minors.

I am about as anti-pedophile as they com. But I am also against the innocent being treated like they were guilty.

---

Good thing that's not what people are asking for.

---

So what are people asking for?

---

Jesus you're insufferable.

---

Then block me.

Asking what people want to see if not a crazy question. Sorry. I am sincerely unaware of what specifically people want to see.

The "files" ... what does that mean? Do they want to see list of associates? Every piece of paper from prior investigations?

Me ... I want those who broke the law to get convicted and sent away.

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

Who knew MAGA was so pedophile enabling?

---

FYI ... I do a lot of work with an abused women's shelter in HB. And many were abused as minors.

I am about as anti-pedophile as they com. But I am also against the innocent being treated like they were guilty.

---

Good thing that's not what people are asking for.

---

So what are people asking for?

---

Jesus you're insufferable.

---

Then block me.

Asking what people want to see if not a crazy question. Sorry. I am sincerely unaware of what specifically people want to see.

The "files" ... what does that mean? Do they want to see list of associates? Every piece of paper from prior investigations?

Me ... I want those who broke the law to get convicted and sent away.

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

Who knew MAGA was so pedophile enabling?

---

FWTXAg said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

Who knew MAGA was so pedophile enabling?

---

FYI ... I do a lot of work with an abused women's shelter in HB. And many were abused as minors.

I am about as anti-pedophile as they com. But I am also against the innocent being treated like they were guilty.

---

Good thing that's not what people are asking for.

---

So what are people asking for?

---

Jesus you're insufferable.

---

Then block me.

Asking what people want to see if not a crazy question. Sorry. I am sincerely unaware of what specifically people want to see.

The "files" ... what does that mean? Do they want to see list of associates? Every piece of paper from prior investigations?

Me ... I want those who broke the law to get convicted and sent away.

---

We're past justice ever happening for the victims. What we have to result to now is FORCING the government to release every single piece of investigative material related to Jeffrey Epstein. His financial records, his friends, his correspondence. All of it.

Then someone much smarter than I is going to figure out how and why he was protected by our government for 20 years, and is now being protected by the people who said they were going to expose the cover-up. That's when the market will crash and the world will turn on its head.

That's the answer to every single question you've asked on this topic for the past week.

Have a nice day!

---

bobbranco said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

Who knew MAGA was so pedophile enabling?

---

From the party that promotes and grooms the MAPs. Lol

---

I’m told that the WSJ article about the Trump letter to Epstein is just the tip of the iceberg. “The dam is breaking”.

More to come…

— Brian Krassenstein (@krassenstein) July 18, 2025

Im Gipper said:

---

"Dam is breaking" is the new "walls are closing in". I miss "noose is tightening"

I’m told that the WSJ article about the Trump letter to Epstein is just the tip of the iceberg. “The dam is breaking”.

More to come…

— Brian Krassenstein (@krassenstein) July 18, 2025

---

aginlakeway said:

---

FWTXAg said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

Who knew MAGA was so pedophile enabling?

---

FYI ... I do a lot of work with an abused women's shelter in HB. And many were abused as minors.

I am about as anti-pedophile as they com. But I am also against the innocent being treated like they were guilty.

---

Good thing that's not what people are asking for.

---

So what are people asking for?

---

Jesus you're insufferable.

---

Then block me.

Asking what people want to see if not a crazy question. Sorry. I am sincerely unaware of what specifically people want to see.

The "files" ... what does that mean? Do they want to see list of associates? Every piece of paper from prior investigations?

Me ... I want those who broke the law to get convicted and sent away.

---

We're past justice ever happening for the victims. What we have to result to now is FORCING the government to release every single piece of investigative material related to Jeffrey Epstein. His financial records, his friends, his correspondence. All of it.

Then someone much smarter than I is going to figure out how and why he was protected by our government for 20 years, and is now being protected by the people who said they were going to expose the cover-up. That's when the market will crash and the world will turn on its head.

That's the answer to every single question you've asked on this topic for the past week.

Have a nice day!

---

Thank you for the answer.

Is that legal for them to do? What about the innocent people who are his friends, part of his correspondences, etc.? Those names and communications will be released?

I don't understand how doing this isn't a massive invasion or privacy, and certain to name names of innocent people.

---

bobbranco said:

---

You thinking your commentary is apolitical is almost as funny as your political views. And yes Democrats actively want to mutilate children.

---

bobbranco said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

Who knew MAGA was so pedophile enabling?

---

From the party that promotes and grooms the MAPs. Lol

---