DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list

221,881 Views | 3105 Replies | Last: 11 min ago by FWTXAg
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
techno-ag said:

74OA said:

Agit8r said:

Deerdude said:

Shouldn't your request be to the judge, and not the Trump admin?

I assume the DOJ asked the judge to do just that, which the judge (obviously) denied.


So, pushing to bring wealthy serial abusers of minors to justice is unreasonable?

I'm at a loss to understand what you're worried about given your confidence that any Trump involvement is utterly implausible.

If so, help release the files and let the chips fall where they may.

Why are you fighting release so hard? I just don't get it.

I don't think anyone is "fighting the release." The judge stands by the norm of keeping grand jury stuff confidential. I suspect there's a lot of innocent names in there, including victims and perhaps falsely accused people. Regardless, if there was really some gotcha that nails Trump, you can be rest assured the Biden administration would have released it already. I mean, look at what they did with all the other false accusations, lawfare and fake 34 felonies etc. etc. etc.

The judge read through it, and said there's no names besides Maxwell and Epstein in the grand jury transcript. Also, pretty much everything there was already made public in her trial, and DOJ vastly over-exaggerated what was in the transcript to the point of almost lying to the court. This was just a disingenuous move by DOJ to either serve as a distraction, or so they could say, "Well, dag nab it, we tried getting the transcript, but that mean ol' judge wouldn't release it." Or maybe both.
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Barr is testifying in Congress today about the Epstein scandal
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Comer also said Barr testified about Trump, saying the former attorney general said he "never had conversations with President Trump pertaining to a client list" related to Epstein and that "he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this."

"Democrats' goal is to try to dig up some type of dirt on President Trump. And what Attorney General Barr testified in there was that he never had conversations with President Trump pertaining to a client list. He didn't know anything about a client list. He said that he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this, and that he believed if there had been anything pertaining to President Trump, with respect to the Epstein list, that he felt like the Biden administration would have probably leaked it out."
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

Comer also said Barr testified about Trump, saying the former attorney general said he "never had conversations with President Trump pertaining to a client list" related to Epstein and that "he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this."

"Democrats' goal is to try to dig up some type of dirt on President Trump. And what Attorney General Barr testified in there was that he never had conversations with President Trump pertaining to a client list. He didn't know anything about a client list. He said that he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this, and that he believed if there had been anything pertaining to President Trump, with respect to the Epstein list, that he felt like the Biden administration would have probably leaked it out."


So….. we don't got im?


/Dems
Pro College Station Convention Center
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

Comer also said Barr testified about Trump, saying the former attorney general said he "never had conversations with President Trump pertaining to a client list" related to Epstein and that "he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this."

"Democrats' goal is to try to dig up some type of dirt on President Trump. And what Attorney General Barr testified in there was that he never had conversations with President Trump pertaining to a client list. He didn't know anything about a client list. He said that he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this, and that he believed if there had been anything pertaining to President Trump, with respect to the Epstein list, that he felt like the Biden administration would have probably leaked it out."

Great. So we all now agree that there's absolutely no reason not to go after the rich pedos documented in the FBI's Epstein evidence files, yes? No more stalling and goaltending……
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
74OA said:

aginlakeway said:

Comer also said Barr testified about Trump, saying the former attorney general said he "never had conversations with President Trump pertaining to a client list" related to Epstein and that "he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this."

"Democrats' goal is to try to dig up some type of dirt on President Trump. And what Attorney General Barr testified in there was that he never had conversations with President Trump pertaining to a client list. He didn't know anything about a client list. He said that he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this, and that he believed if there had been anything pertaining to President Trump, with respect to the Epstein list, that he felt like the Biden administration would have probably leaked it out."

Great. So we all now agree that there's absolutely no reason not to go after the rich pedos documented in the FBI's Epstein evidence files, yes? No more stalling and goaltending……


Correct. As long as innocent names aren't released. 100% agree.

But no Trump = a non story to the media.
Danimal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never seeing anything means nothing

74OA said:

aginlakeway said:

Comer also said Barr testified about Trump, saying the former attorney general said he "never had conversations with President Trump pertaining to a client list" related to Epstein and that "he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this."

"Democrats' goal is to try to dig up some type of dirt on President Trump. And what Attorney General Barr testified in there was that he never had conversations with President Trump pertaining to a client list. He didn't know anything about a client list. He said that he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this, and that he believed if there had been anything pertaining to President Trump, with respect to the Epstein list, that he felt like the Biden administration would have probably leaked it out."

Great. So we all now agree that there's absolutely no reason not to go after the rich pedos documented in the FBI's Epstein evidence files, yes? No more stalling and goaltending……
Juan Lee Pettimore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Danimal said:

Never seeing anything means nothing

74OA said:

aginlakeway said:

Comer also said Barr testified about Trump, saying the former attorney general said he "never had conversations with President Trump pertaining to a client list" related to Epstein and that "he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this."

"Democrats' goal is to try to dig up some type of dirt on President Trump. And what Attorney General Barr testified in there was that he never had conversations with President Trump pertaining to a client list. He didn't know anything about a client list. He said that he had never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this, and that he believed if there had been anything pertaining to President Trump, with respect to the Epstein list, that he felt like the Biden administration would have probably leaked it out."

Great. So we all now agree that there's absolutely no reason not to go after the rich pedos documented in the FBI's Epstein evidence files, yes? No more stalling and goaltending……



So pathetic:
OPAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here is the problem with the TDS ers. There is absolutely no way that you can prove you didn't do something if given enough time frame.

This especially true when you can go back years into the past and then say. "Prove that you have not ever been a pedo!" This cannot ever be proven. You can not offer up evidence to disproves something you never did!

Yet that is the TDSer to the core, They have decided that he is guilty of this and nothing will ever disuade them.

So know years later, 'witnesses' show up, and they are to be believed, well because Trump is really guilty and they are desperate to find anything to verify it. No matter what,

The Russia Russia Russia lie was totally a created lie, but there are still TDSers who believe he in the golden showers, etc and is Putin's puppet and still is. Nothing can be done to dissuade them otherwise. Even thought the massive amounts of real evidence shows that he is anything but.

The fact that previous victimes said Trump was not one of them and was in fact helpful in helping them with their case, DOES NOT MATTER.

These are truly deceived ones, they are not worth the time spent on them.
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Michael Wolff is live right now on Patrick Bet David talking about his 100s of hours of Epstein interviews, and made the claim the reason Bannon hasn't released his 10 hr interview of Epstein is because Bannon doesn't own the videos. He paid Bannon to interview him to try and clean up his Social presence and the Epstein estate owns the tapes and Bannon is just fund raising off the hint he will eventually release them and he can't.

Consider the source and a grain of salt take


"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bannon is the king of the grift so it would not be a surprise.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
OPAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

Bannon is the king of the grift so it would not be a surprise.

Ah the word 'grifter' the new ad hominen attack to replace 'conspiracy theorist'.

Every one who was a 'conspiracy theorist' is now called a 'grifter', File updated. LOL
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OPAG said:

Rapier108 said:

Bannon is the king of the grift so it would not be a surprise.

Ah the word 'grifter' the new ad hominen attack to replace 'conspiracy theorist'.

Every one who was a 'conspiracy theorist' is now called a 'grifter', File updated. LOL

Very wrong on this one.

Bannon has never been described as a conspiracy theorist

Grifter has a specific meaning. It fits Bannon to a tee.

How much you send him?

I'm Gipper
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OPAG said:

Rapier108 said:

Bannon is the king of the grift so it would not be a surprise.

Ah the word 'grifter' the new ad hominen attack to replace 'conspiracy theorist'.

Every one who was a 'conspiracy theorist' is now called a 'grifter', File updated. LOL



Considering the source here applies too
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ah yes, can't refute what I said, so straight to the personal attacks.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
TheCurl84
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rapier108 said:

Oh yes, can't refute what I said, so straight to the personal attacks.

Projection much???
OPAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

OPAG said:

Rapier108 said:

Bannon is the king of the grift so it would not be a surprise.

Ah the word 'grifter' the new ad hominen attack to replace 'conspiracy theorist'.

Every one who was a 'conspiracy theorist' is now called a 'grifter', File updated. LOL

Very wrong on this one.

Bannon has never been described as a conspiracy theorist

Grifter has a specific meaning. It fits Bannon to a tee.

How much you send him?

Nothing, I am not a Bannon guy at all. I just see the word 'grift' and 'grifter' used a whole lot now>
It's the ad hominen attack. Everyone who is not of our ilk is a 'griftter'.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:




Nothing burger. Long live the intelligence agencies and the deep state.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The timing seems to indicate that the files where in John Bolton's garage and have just been seized.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:




Dude flops like Romney on the Epstein issue lol
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good to see this being released.

I'm Gipper
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Ghislaine Maxwell plainly says says no Jeffrey Epstein client list exists on the DOJ interview recordings that were just released along with the transcript

"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But there was a phone book that Epstein's servants were instructed to always keep at hand for his use but not in the more public spaces of his homes. That phone book had all of the names and contact information of his extensive social group.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Crazy that some out there still think there's a "list" out there.

I'm Gipper
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:



1. She'd say anything to not spend her life rotting in real prison, and it worked, she's now in a minimum-security farm on work release during the day. It is beyond suspicious that someone convicted of her particular crime got this break, particularly as it came almost immediately after speaking to DOJ. Quid pro quo? Who knows.
2. Having said that, I'm fine with accepting that Trump is clean. But that's never been my primary interest. Going after the wealthy pedo's is what I want and don't tell me that the absence of a nice, convenient client list prevents the FBI from combing the wealth of evidence it has to find out who they are. Remember:

"The three-page index is a report generated by the FBI that lists the evidence inventoried by federal law enforcement during the multiple investigations into his (Epstein's) conduct. According to that index, the remaining materials include 40 computers and electronic devices, 26 storage drives, more than 70 CDs and six recording devices. The devices hold more than 300 gigabytes of data, according to the DOJ. The evidence also includes approximately 60 pieces of physical evidence, including photographs, travel logs, employee lists...."

WOW
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?


"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.