A.G.S.94 said:

---

I also know only one man walked on water and that was a while back.

---

Gig em G said:

---

Queso1 said:

---

Are we still interested in this? It's seems to have gone from a MAGA demand to lefties and Tucker listeners issue.

---

Yes. Still want answers

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

Tea Party said:

---

Juan Lee Pettimore said:

---

And how exactly does America benefit by that coming out?

---

He's trolling.

---

Not trolling at all. Trolling is not engaging in the conversation. I have done plenty of that. Genuinely done that until the horse has been thoroughly demised. At some point, it becomes ripe for sarcasm to point out the outlandish was of those still rooting for ****** Massie.

Sarcasm = / = Trolling

---

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3548558/replies/70745850

Here you are saying you keep coming back to this thread in order to make fun of people. Pretty sure that's trolling.

---

ETFan said:

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

Tea Party said:

---

Juan Lee Pettimore said:

---

And how exactly does America benefit by that coming out?

---

He's trolling.

---

Not trolling at all. Trolling is not engaging in the conversation. I have done plenty of that. Genuinely done that until the horse has been thoroughly demised. At some point, it becomes ripe for sarcasm to point out the outlandish was of those still rooting for ****** Massie.

Sarcasm = / = Trolling

---

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3548558/replies/70745850

Here you are saying you keep coming back to this thread in order to make fun of people. Pretty sure that's trolling.

---

Only us liberals get banned for la croix trolling. Can't even get near full-blown trolling.

Anyway, bump. What's the word on this?

---

“I can’t see another reason,” Adelita Grijalva tells Rolling Stone.

“It doesn’t change the majority, Democrats are still in the minority. That seems to be the only outstanding issue that I can see."

Story: https://t.co/AcrFZv7XoY pic.twitter.com/AP1ZbYshfU

— Rolling Stone (@RollingStone) September 30, 2025

KIKIAggies859 said:

---

Boy, this is quite the dilemma for our mainstream Marxist press. They completely ignored this during the addled-brain Biden administration, but you know they would love to skewer Trump for this obvious B.S. However, if they go after Trump for this, that brings a HUGE amount of unwanted attention to their buddies/DNC spiritual leaders/fellow members of the slimy media. What a delicious conundrum these little weasels find themselves in!

---

KIKIAggies859 said:

---

Boy, this is quite the dilemma for our mainstream Marxist press. They completely ignored this during the addled-brain Biden administration, but you know they would love to skewer Trump for this obvious B.S. However, if they go after Trump for this, that brings a HUGE amount of unwanted attention to their buddies/DNC spiritual leaders/fellow members of the slimy media. What a delicious conundrum these little weasels find themselves in!

---

ETFan said:

---

KIKIAggies859 said:

---

Boy, this is quite the dilemma for our mainstream Marxist press. They completely ignored this during the addled-brain Biden administration, but you know they would love to skewer Trump for this obvious B.S. However, if they go after Trump for this, that brings a HUGE amount of unwanted attention to their buddies/DNC spiritual leaders/fellow members of the slimy media. What a delicious conundrum these little weasels find themselves in!

---

I'm not attached to any politician - investigate and jail anyone involved in trafficking or rape. Period. Easy.

But your concern about Biden not releasing them misses the point: neither president has the power to just 'release' court documents and sealed FBI files. That's not how the legal system works. Most releases come through court orders, not the White House. The Biden admin let these releases go through normal legal channels, and a LOT of information was released.

Now imagine if Biden had ordered his DOJ to release "the list" during an election year - you'd have called it political interference.

Here's what's actually suspicious: Trump and his team campaigned on releasing this information. They showed us binders, tweeted about it, talked about it constantly. Then he called his base stupid and dropped it entirely. Now his administration is against releasing more information, and so are his agencies.

Biden never had agencies blocking releases - they followed the law. Trump took over and apparently decided the oligarchy's pedophile ring isn't a problem anymore. And neither do you or any Republican in Congress, apparently.

They are literally blocking the legal avenues for releasing more information to the American public.

---

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told @mirandadevine on this week's episode of "Pod Force One" that late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein was "the greatest blackmailer ever." Subscribe here: https://t.co/Hx8mlCYjjN pic.twitter.com/AMBu8zfFlN

— New York Post (@nypost) October 1, 2025

ETFan said:

---

Also, Lutnick apparently bought his/a home from Epstein for $10. Weird **** everywhere you look.

---

Quote:

---

Epstein also had ties to the house next door at 11 East 71st Street, now owned by Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, his neighbor for at least two decades. In 1988, SAM Conversion Corp. -- a company based in Columbus, Ohio registered to an address then associated with Wexner -- purchased the three-story home for an undisclosed amount.

---

RED AG 98 said:

---

Quote:

---

Epstein also had ties to the house next door at 11 East 71st Street, now owned by Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, his neighbor for at least two decades. In 1988, SAM Conversion Corp. -- a company based in Columbus, Ohio registered to an address then associated with Wexner -- purchased the three-story home for an undisclosed amount.

---

https://www.forbes.com/sites/giacomotognini/2025/07/22/epsteins-properties-were-allegedly-the-sites-of-sexual-exploitation-now-theyve-all-been-sold/

The $10 sale amount isn't real; it's a common placeholder for "undisclosed" amount.

---

Quote:

---

Lutnick told "Pod Force One" host Miranda Devine that Epstein was a "disgusting person" from whom he and his wife kept their distance.

The Commerce secretary, who was Epstein's ex-neighbor, described to Devine his interaction with the financier during a tour of Epstein's home. Lutnick said the space was centered around a massage table surrounded with candles.

"I say to him, 'Massage table in the middle of your house? How often do you have a massage?' And he says, 'Every day,'" Lutnick told Devine.

"And then he like gets like weirdly close to me, and he says, 'And the right kind of massage," he added.

Lutnick said he and his wife immediately left and that he decided he "will never be in the room with that disgusting person ever again."

---

flown-the-coop said:

---

RED AG 98 said:

---

Quote:

---

Epstein also had ties to the house next door at 11 East 71st Street, now owned by Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, his neighbor for at least two decades. In 1988, SAM Conversion Corp. -- a company based in Columbus, Ohio registered to an address then associated with Wexner -- purchased the three-story home for an undisclosed amount.

---

https://www.forbes.com/sites/giacomotognini/2025/07/22/epsteins-properties-were-allegedly-the-sites-of-sexual-exploitation-now-theyve-all-been-sold/

The $10 sale amount isn't real; it's a common placeholder for "undisclosed" amount.

---

Thanks. That was what I was seeing as well.

Also, regarding the innuendo by ETFan regarding Lutnick and Epstein... evidently they didn't care to check out the OP and what Lutnick had to say on Epstein and the house next door.

Quote:

---

Lutnick told "Pod Force One" host Miranda Devine that Epstein was a "disgusting person" from whom he and his wife kept their distance.

The Commerce secretary, who was Epstein's ex-neighbor, described to Devine his interaction with the financier during a tour of Epstein's home. Lutnick said the space was centered around a massage table surrounded with candles.

"I say to him, 'Massage table in the middle of your house? How often do you have a massage?' And he says, 'Every day,'" Lutnick told Devine.

"And then he like gets like weirdly close to me, and he says, 'And the right kind of massage," he added.

Lutnick said he and his wife immediately left and that he decided he "will never be in the room with that disgusting person ever again."

---

---

ETFan said:

---

It was about the weakest possible "innuendo" I could have used? I just threw it out as something else that looked weird. This whole thing is weird, you know it. I appear to be wrong about the $10 thing. I will ride off in shame... lol

Anyway, possibility of tapes, and the things that actually matter. A conservative controlled government doing everything it can to deflect from the Epstein issue.

---

Quote:

---

So, who was he BLACKMAILING?

---