DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list

284,333 Views | 3403 Replies | Last: 14 hrs ago by AggieVictor10
Joseydog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

Joseydog said:

aginlakeway said:

Joseydog said:

aginlakeway said:

So you're seeking proof that he's not guilty?

Near zero chance Trump did anything wrong here. It would have come out a long time ago. IMO. But I don't have inside info like some posters here apparently do.

If Trump did not do anything wrong, then why would his Administration ever make any deals with Maxwell. It simply belies common sense.


What deal did the administration make with Maxwell?

Again, you're trying to prove innocence.

Good luck with that.

Explain to me why she was transfer prisons if there was no deal made.



No idea. You're the one who said a deal was made. I assumed you had knowledge of a deal.

Hello common sense. The DOJ does not move a convicted child molester and child trafficker to a minimum security prison without a purpose. And then have the 2nd person in command with the DOJ, who just happens to be the president's former personal attorney, conduct an interview with said child molester.

BTW: I do know a bit about the DOJ and AUSAs and I have never seen anyone at the level of Blanche be personally involved in "investigations."
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Joseydog said:

aginlakeway said:

Joseydog said:

aginlakeway said:

Joseydog said:

aginlakeway said:

So you're seeking proof that he's not guilty?

Near zero chance Trump did anything wrong here. It would have come out a long time ago. IMO. But I don't have inside info like some posters here apparently do.

If Trump did not do anything wrong, then why would his Administration ever make any deals with Maxwell. It simply belies common sense.


What deal did the administration make with Maxwell?

Again, you're trying to prove innocence.

Good luck with that.

Explain to me why she was transfer prisons if there was no deal made.



No idea. You're the one who said a deal was made. I assumed you had knowledge of a deal.

Hello common sense. The DOJ does not move a convicted child molester and child trafficker to a minimum security prison without a purpose. And then have the 2nd person in command with the DOJ, who just happens to be the president's former personal attorney, conduct an interview with said child molester.

BTW: I do know a bit about the DOJ and AUSAs and I have never seen anyone at the level of Blanche be personally involved in "investigations."



When it comes to sex crimes, in prefer facts to opinions.

Bottom line: No idea how to prove innocence. That's a new concept to me. And I know a bit too.

Agree to disagree.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Danimal said:

Money distorts a lot of things. Don't be naive. He did it. He has the money to clean it up. End of story.

Yall really think the pics of him and the verified comments he's made about epstein are fake? This is ludicrous.

Money distorts a lot of things, but Hunter Biden totally never sold influence and Kamala Harris had $1.5billion she sod t and still lost. But Trump and Epstein are the real problem.
Joseydog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

Joseydog said:

aginlakeway said:

Joseydog said:

aginlakeway said:

Joseydog said:

aginlakeway said:

So you're seeking proof that he's not guilty?

Near zero chance Trump did anything wrong here. It would have come out a long time ago. IMO. But I don't have inside info like some posters here apparently do.

If Trump did not do anything wrong, then why would his Administration ever make any deals with Maxwell. It simply belies common sense.


What deal did the administration make with Maxwell?

Again, you're trying to prove innocence.

Good luck with that.

Explain to me why she was transfer prisons if there was no deal made.



No idea. You're the one who said a deal was made. I assumed you had knowledge of a deal.

Hello common sense. The DOJ does not move a convicted child molester and child trafficker to a minimum security prison without a purpose. And then have the 2nd person in command with the DOJ, who just happens to be the president's former personal attorney, conduct an interview with said child molester.

BTW: I do know a bit about the DOJ and AUSAs and I have never seen anyone at the level of Blanche be personally involved in "investigations."



When it comes to sex crimes, in prefer facts to opinions.

Bottom line: No idea how to prove innocence. That's a new concept to me. And I know a bit too.

Agree to disagree.

We will agree to disagree. Cheers!

More importantly, beat the hell out of tu!


No matter how we may disagree politically, we are all Aggies and I hope that we treat each other respectfully.
Gig'em


Wildmen03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

Danimal said:

I wish so badly we could put to a vote whether we believe Trump ever violated sexual assault laws and/or underage sexual contact laws. With our names.

I'd love to see real names behind all this goal post moving defense of him. He did it. They scrubbed it. It took a couple months and he has his "credible" source now.

People who don't believe that are only brave enough to defend him on message boards behind a username. They desperately don't want their team to lose. Shame.


What did he do? And how do you know what he did? And if he did it, why didn't it come out while Democrats were in charge of the files?

IMO, this comes out years ago IF Trump did anything wrong.

Unsure why you're interested in real names.

The left loves to dox people and sic the mob after them.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggies don't convict others of crimes with zero evidence. So no, we are not all Aggies. Either say Trump is innocent or put up some actual evidence. This is America, right?

I mean you folks think States can behave whichever way they want, felons can carry bazookas and some folks are just guilty cause I don't like their style.
Pizza
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

This is America, right?

I mean you folks think States can behave whichever way they want, felons can carry bazookas and some folks are just guilty cause I don't like their style.


....felons with bazookas?

ETA: this sounds like a Randy Marsh quote.
mslags97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Danimal said:

Money distorts a lot of things. Don't be naive. He did it. He has the money to clean it up. End of story.

Yall really think the pics of him and the verified comments he's made about epstein are fake? This is ludicrous.


How can this troll continue to be allowed to post on here. Nobody can be this stupid. And how Texags hammers others and deletes posts and allows this will never make sense.
mslags97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Joseydog said:

flown-the-coop said:

And you would still clamor that "it's not enough" or "surely they held back files" and "you know Bondi covered for Trump".

Can you admit that you will hold Trump guilty or at least in doubt no matter what?

Cause admitting the problem is your first step to dealing with it and moving on.

I absolutely am open to evidence that Trump is not guilty.




Guess the thing called presumption of innocence just goes out the door….

The insanity that anyone thinks Trump did anything wrong and had anything to do with Epstein in any unsavory way is beyond comprehension.

The dems have done everything they can to take him down. They have tried to kill him. They have tried to manufacture crimes to imprison him. They have lied and been caught repeatedly in those lies. They have covered up tons of insane BS. They lied repeatedly about Russia…. About the Hunter laptop. They were as openly dishonest as can be. All to make sure Trump is taken down.

And still the massive TDS morons think he is covering up Epstein stuff…. The massive stupidity that has to be involved in thinking this is the case when there is no way this is kept quiet if it would take Trump down is incomprehensible!!!

And the dims think he should have to prove he had nothing to do with Epstein…. Dumb, dumb, dumb…..
mslags97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Joseydog said:

aginlakeway said:

So you're seeking proof that he's not guilty?

Near zero chance Trump did anything wrong here. It would have come out a long time ago. IMO. But I don't have inside info like some posters here apparently do.

If Trump did not do anything wrong, then why would his Administration ever make any deals with Maxwell. It simply belies common sense.


If Trump DID something wrong then why didn't the dems do something about it for the last 5 years.

Stupid is as stupid does.
Joseydog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Believe what ever makes you sleep better at night…



And Democrats are a bunch of beotches. That is why they are sinking in the polls. Not because they are woke or because of trans issues. It's because they are going to send "strongly worded letters." Whatever. Democrats are weak and that is why their polls numbers are dropping. Republicans will sweep the midterms unless the Democrats grow a spine, which is doubtful.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

Since the other threads got locked.

$10 Billy!




Maxwell says in her interview she can't recall who submitted notes/drawings for the birthday book
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

In her interview with the DOJ, Ghislaine Maxwell said she "absolutely never" heard of President Trump doing anything inappropriate with anyone related to her or Epstein.
BREAKING: woman seeking pardon from president for sex trafficking children says he wasn't involved! pack it up everyone, nothing to see here!
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tough morning for you.
Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Troll account but Dems had 8 years to go thru this evidence to find dirt. Why do you always omit that in all conversations? I guess it's just your MO. Same goes with wets that you forget are illegally in the country before they start committing crimes.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All of these can be true at the same time:

Maxwell has zero credibility. She's a felon trying to get lienancy, commutation or pardon

Trump didn't traffic or have sex with minors.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

will25u said:




The Trump haters won't believe this.


Maga wouldn't believe it if she showed video of Trump having sex with a tween, but that's neither here nor there because Twitter, yet again, was right that since she was sent to the day spa prison, she'd say things to make Trump and his maga happy.

Now to see how right Twitter is in that she will be pardoned and be home for Christmas.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do you not agree that Biden and DNC would have used anything related to Trump in Epstein garbage? Simple question.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Deerdude said:

Do you not agree that Biden and DNC would have used anything related to Trump in Epstein garbage? Simple question.

Yes.

Do you not agree that Trump and those in the position to, should do what they told maga they would do and release everything there is on Epstein?
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BMX Bandit said:

All of these can be true at the same time:

Maxwell has zero credibility. She's a felon trying to get lienancy, commutation or pardon

Trump didn't traffic or have sex with minors.


Most likely scenario IMO.
suburban cowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Was everyone actually naive enough to believe there was a physical list?.

The point is Maxwell knows names to make a list.
mslags97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Awful lot of spinning from the no spin guy…..

This is a non-topic for you TDS guys. You all are just too stupid to recognize that.

If there was ANYTHING in there that would hurt Trump, it absolutely would have already been used.

But keep spinning.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
mslags97 said:

Awful lot of spinning from the no spin guy…..

This is a non-topic for you TDS guys. You all are just too stupid to recognize that.

If there was ANYTHING in there that would hurt Trump, it absolutely would have already been used.

But keep spinning.

I never said Trump did anything wrong.

I, like many a maga, am just wanting Trump to do what he said he was going to. You know, a promise made and all that.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No Spin Ag said:

mslags97 said:

Awful lot of spinning from the no spin guy…..

This is a non-topic for you TDS guys. You all are just too stupid to recognize that.

If there was ANYTHING in there that would hurt Trump, it absolutely would have already been used.

But keep spinning.

I never said Trump did anything wrong.

I, like many a maga, am just wanting Trump to do what he said he was going to. You know, a promise made and all that.


Politicians make promises all the time.

He's done a ton of what he said that he'd do. I don't know anyone who cares about Epstein more than 10 other issues that he's doing well on.
Sweep4-2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When someone says they'll do something and they don't it's called a lie.

But it's ok because all politicians lie. It's what they do. They have to in order to work minimal hours and become insanely wealthy despite a mediocre salary.
Consistency: It's only a virtue if you're not a screw-up.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

No Spin Ag said:

mslags97 said:

Awful lot of spinning from the no spin guy…..

This is a non-topic for you TDS guys. You all are just too stupid to recognize that.

If there was ANYTHING in there that would hurt Trump, it absolutely would have already been used.

But keep spinning.

I never said Trump did anything wrong.

I, like many a maga, am just wanting Trump to do what he said he was going to. You know, a promise made and all that.


Politicians make promises all the time.

He's done a ton of what he said that he'd do. I don't know anyone who cares about Epstein more than 10 other issues that he's doing well on.

And I, like others. don't see why it can't be done. It's not as if it requires 2/3 of Congress to make it happen. I'd imagine it would be as easy as him doing an EO, which we all know he does all the time.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No Spin Ag said:

aginlakeway said:

No Spin Ag said:

mslags97 said:

Awful lot of spinning from the no spin guy…..

This is a non-topic for you TDS guys. You all are just too stupid to recognize that.

If there was ANYTHING in there that would hurt Trump, it absolutely would have already been used.

But keep spinning.

I never said Trump did anything wrong.

I, like many a maga, am just wanting Trump to do what he said he was going to. You know, a promise made and all that.


Politicians make promises all the time.

He's done a ton of what he said that he'd do. I don't know anyone who cares about Epstein more than 10 other issues that he's doing well on.

And I, like others. don't see why it can't be done. It's not as if it requires 2/3 of Congress to make it happen. I'd imagine it would be as easy as him doing an EO, which we all know he does all the time.


OK. I guess we'll see what happens.

Me ... I am very happy with some things Trump has gotten done so far. This is an interesting message board topics -- until next weekend -- but very few voters care about this issue. Not even in their top 10 issues. Maybe top 20.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

No Spin Ag said:

aginlakeway said:

No Spin Ag said:

mslags97 said:

Awful lot of spinning from the no spin guy…..

This is a non-topic for you TDS guys. You all are just too stupid to recognize that.

If there was ANYTHING in there that would hurt Trump, it absolutely would have already been used.

But keep spinning.

I never said Trump did anything wrong.

I, like many a maga, am just wanting Trump to do what he said he was going to. You know, a promise made and all that.


Politicians make promises all the time.

He's done a ton of what he said that he'd do. I don't know anyone who cares about Epstein more than 10 other issues that he's doing well on.

And I, like others. don't see why it can't be done. It's not as if it requires 2/3 of Congress to make it happen. I'd imagine it would be as easy as him doing an EO, which we all know he does all the time.


OK. I guess we'll see what happens.

Me ... I am very happy with some things Trump has gotten done so far. This is an interesting message board topics -- until next weekend -- but very few voters care about this issue. Not even in their top 10 issues. Maybe top 20.

I'm happy with pretty much everything he's done as well, and honestly, had it not been made such a big deal of (Binders and right-wing influencers at the WH and all), I think this would have faded a long time ago. But, like you said, we'll see.

Either way, so long as the economy continues on the path to turning around, it's as great as start as one can hope for.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No Spin Ag said:

Deerdude said:

Do you not agree that Biden and DNC would have used anything related to Trump in Epstein garbage? Simple question.

Yes.

Do you not agree that Trump and those in the position to, should do what they told maga they would do and release everything there is on Epstein?


Absolutely, but I'm not acting like a spoiled petulant child. It will come out in due time. My guess is that as he usually does, he's playing the TDS folks for all he can get out of it. Get every possible TDS pundit to make their ridiculous prognostications about doom and then once again prove them wrong. It's a game that liberals love to lose.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You were just showing you have a different strain of TDS.

There is no 4D chess being played. Nothing more is coming out. We are never going to know the names of the unindicted co-conspirators


Epstein is over.

I'm Gipper
Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'll put a $100 spot that it comes out. Not unredacted to protect victims. Care to ante up?
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sure, but I'm over 60! How long you think I'm going to live?

I'm Gipper
Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm 66 and not worried about it. Have not lost a bit of sleep over it, and won't. It will happen at most opportune time for him, his presidency, and the RNC.

Not you and me.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pretty sure their username is meant as sarcasm. All I see is spin.

People will never let Trump be innocent. To do so would mean they were wrong and always wrong about who Trump is.

Same folks think he banged Stormy, gave E Jean Carroll his digits, and peed on hookers in a Moscow hotel room.
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

You were just showing you have a different strain of TDS.

There is no 4D chess being played. Nothing more is coming out. We are never going to know the names of the unindicted co-conspirators


Epstein is over.


It'll only be over because maga and conservatives let it be over. Not an ounce of integrity to be had and we all know being lied to is apparently something his side enjoys. Hell, he goes as far as to call them stupid and they still defend him.

Once again, for the millionth time, he campaigned on this. He campaigned on releasing the epstien info. Then suddenly it's a Democrat hoax, you're all stupid, the dems are all stupid, suddenly we're moving Maxwell around (????), sending fake videos, saying nothing exists now.

Are you guys serious?

Don't deflect to "but the dems". They control nothing. They didn't campaign on releasing info. I bet some prominent dem names are in the 'files'. Some republicans too.


Guess what, release it all. Why would you not want that? Both sides should be pushing to have all of this info released. The fealty to one person is absolutely bizarre.

Oh wait nvm...
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.