DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list

293,571 Views | 3446 Replies | Last: 1 min ago by flown-the-coop
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FWTXAg said:

captkirk said:




This is not left vs right this is Rich Vs. the Rest of Us


Well, you've also got hundreds of male criminals running free, and the only person actually in prison is a woman. Nothing to see here.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
Sweepscc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let her under secretary take care of it then. She needs to start doing more action less talk. Indictments should be coming out by the dozens everyday on these traitorous DC scum.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sweepscc said:

Let her under secretary take care of it then. She needs to start doing more action less talk. Indictments should be coming out by the dozens everyday on these traitorous DC scum.


Seems like the best way to be done with this Epstein distraction would be to release everything then lol
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FWTXAg said:

Sweepscc said:

No one cares about this. How bout Pam start doing her job and prosecuting the scum who abused their tremendous powers in the intel community


No. Everyone who isn't a partisan sheep cares about this. Democrats are a corrupt embarrassment, so are Republicans. What the partisan hack supporters fail to realize is that their "leaders" who they cheer for like a football team are all on the same side and they laugh at their supporters while they cash their checks and play badminton together.




This guy gets it.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Sweepscc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions said:

Sweepscc said:

Let her under secretary take care of it then. She needs to start doing more action less talk. Indictments should be coming out by the dozens everyday on these traitorous DC scum.


Seems like the best way to be done with this Epstein distraction would be to release everything then lol

Let's do it. Problem now is either **** gets doctored after 25 plus years or they'll keep stalling as a stunt. It's clear Trump wasn't on that pedo train or that **** would've been released 12 years ago
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bernie Sanders has more in common with Donald Trump than his supporters do.
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sweepscc said:

Let her under secretary take care of it then. She needs to start doing more action less talk. Indictments should be coming out by the dozens everyday on these traitorous DC scum.


I don't understand.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
5thGenAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gig em G said:

I swear if Trump ends up pardoning a convicted pedophile child trafficker...after all that he campaigned on, I'm done.


Don't worry, she won't get pardoned until Trump's last day in office- so you have a few years to stay on board.
AggieVictor10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
5thGenAg said:

Gig em G said:

I swear if Trump ends up pardoning a convicted pedophile child trafficker...after all that he campaigned on, I'm done.


Don't worry, she won't get pardoned until Trump's last day in office- so you have a few years to stay on board.


They'll all stay on board as long as he owns the libs (or says he's owning the libs).
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FWTXAg said:

Keep this at the top. Other political topics are elementary.

Why haven't they sworn in the 218th signature which will compel a vote to release? Insane.

Johnson is a snake.

Still a snake. Bump.


Conservatives desperately protecting a pedophile ring. Full stop.
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
94chem said:

FWTXAg said:

captkirk said:




This is not left vs right this is Rich Vs. the Rest of Us


Well, you've also got hundreds of male criminals running free, and the only person actually in prison is a woman. Nothing to see here.

For now. Not if maga has their way, she'll be free too.

I'm not doing both sides on this one. There are 217 votes waiting and an R majority EXPLICITLY not voting on this.

EDIT: Snake:

No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ETFan said:

FWTXAg said:

Keep this at the top. Other political topics are elementary.

Why haven't they sworn in the 218th signature which will compel a vote to release? Insane.

Johnson is a snake.

Still a snake. Bump.


Conservatives desperately protecting a pedophile ring. Full stop.

I don't know if they're protecting pedophiles, but there sure does seem to be more that they could do to bring justice to the pedo's victims.

For the party of supposed law and order, there sure does not seem to be much desire to bring either when all it would take is releasing a list.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
AtomicActuator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's mind-numbingly transparent what happened. They were all gung ho about releasing them until they saw what was in them and who was implicated.

This is an issue we should all be able to get behind. It's clear that powerful people on both sides would go down. Good.
f1ghtintexasaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ETFan said:

FWTXAg said:

Keep this at the top. Other political topics are elementary.

Why haven't they sworn in the 218th signature which will compel a vote to release? Insane.

Johnson is a snake.

Still a snake. Bump.


Republicans desperately protecting a pedophile ring. Full stop.


FIFY

The most conservative member of Congress is leading the charge against the Rs to do the right thing here.
Gig em G
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AtomicActuator said:

It's mind-numbingly transparent what happened. They were all gung ho about releasing them until they saw what was in them and who was implicated.

This is an issue we should all be able to get behind. It's clear that powerful people on both sides would go down. Good.


That's what I don't understand. I thought we had a pretty good idea what was in them and who was implicated like 5 or 6 years ago….What did they expect?

I don't care though. Predators among the elites and politicians must face consequences, no matter their left or right leanings or what position they hold. And Epstein's intelligence connections need to be publicly acknowledged
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk said:




Whoa. Devastating.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag said:

captkirk said:




Whoa. Devastating.


Entire topic is devastating for both parties. Gotta love it.

Thanks for the bump
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ETFan said:

94chem said:

FWTXAg said:

captkirk said:




This is not left vs right this is Rich Vs. the Rest of Us


Well, you've also got hundreds of male criminals running free, and the only person actually in prison is a woman. Nothing to see here.

For now. Not if maga has their way, she'll be free too.

I'm not doing both sides on this one. There are 217 votes waiting and an R majority EXPLICITLY not voting on this.

EDIT: Snake:




Give them bread and circuses and they will never revolt.
revvie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
P Diddy, Ghislaine Maxwell, or Epstein files..... Which is released first? My bet is Epstein files released last. Nothing that warrants a criminal prosecution, but embarrassing details that neither party wants brought to light.
NormanEH
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ttt for our new friends just learning of politicians protecting pedos.

https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/3566344
Aggie_Journalist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Did Republicans ever try to force a vote on the Epstein files when Biden was in office?

Or is the current attempt to make them public by the Democrats + Massie the first time either party attempted a concerted vote on the matter?
Thanks and gig'em
AtomicActuator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The story is that they needed to wait for all of Maxwell's appeals to be exhausted, which just happened a couple days ago technically when SCOTUS denied her appeal.

So Biden had an excuse of sorts, but there aren't really any valid excuses left.
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Apparently, the FBI did an incredibly sloppy examination of Epstein's cell after his death.

"Details pulled from 90 photos of the cell and other evidence collected in the hours after Epstein's death but before FBI agents arrived to process the scene appear to show a succession of basic oversights, ranging from an absence of evidence markers to items being moved, experts told CBS News."

"The FBI literally has all of the best tools. I mean, spared no expense. They have every tool you can imagine. And they used none of it as far as we can tell," forensic analyst Nick Barreiro said after reviewing the photos, many of which have never been published. "How are there not way more people pointing out the absurdity of this?"

FORENSICS?


ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Almost pushed to page 4, this government shutdown to protect rich pedophiles is crazy.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
diamondag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
91AggieLawyer said:

I argued back when this happened that the case for suicide was actually stronger than the alternative. "They" had all that time to kill him when he wasn't in custody and waited until he was, which didn't make a whole lot of sense.



HOWEVER, the idea that he didn't have a client list is beyond preposterous. How the hell did he grow his fortune? Have a private island? LIVE? He had no other means of income and his cover of being a financial whatever was blown sky high. He didn't know stock options from the wishbone option.

Besides, what exactly was Ghislaine Maxwell convicted of if not running girls for Epstein's clients. Either she had a client list or Epstein did.




Why don't they just ask her(Maxwell)? She knows who the clients were first hand

Why can't they then research the list I am sure people will talk

The victims The girls recruited will know who they were forced to be with

Seems the agencies are all of a sudden incompetent to do their CSI ??
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"A posthumous memoir by Jeffrey Epstein accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre offers an expanded account about her long-standing claims to have been sexually trafficked by the late financier to billionaires, politicians and Britain's Prince Andrew.

Many Epstein victims have told their stories publicly over the years, but Giuffre always stood apart with her claim to have been "loaned" to Epstein's rich and powerful friends and acquaintances."

PEDOS
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
More pedo smoke, but we'll never know how big the fire is until Congress votes to release the files.

"Prince Andrew, younger brother of King Charles III and son of the late Queen Elizabeth II, will no longer use his royal titles amid renewed scrutiny over his relationship with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein."

FIRE
RogerFurlong
How long do you want to ignore this user?
74OA said:

More pedo smoke, but we'll never know how big the fire is until Congress votes to release the files.

"Prince Andrew, younger brother of King Charles III and son of the late Queen Elizabeth II, will no longer use his royal titles amid renewed scrutiny over his relationship with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein."

FIRE

Look like the no kings protest is working. And yall thought they were dumb.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Trump pitching another fit at Paul/Massie. Funny how he's mad that the principled politicians he previously endorsed continue to follow those principles
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

More pedo smoke, but we'll never know how big the fire is until Congress votes to release the files.

"Prince Andrew, younger brother of King Charles III and son of the late Queen Elizabeth II, will no longer use his royal titles amid renewed scrutiny over his relationship with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein."

FIRE


We're not getting those files brother. We live in a simulation.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

More pedo smoke, but we'll never know how big the fire is until Congress votes to release the files.

"Prince Andrew, younger brother of King Charles III and son of the late Queen Elizabeth II, will no longer use his royal titles amid renewed scrutiny over his relationship with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein."

FIRE


You know it was Congress who released the additional files yesterday, released the birthday book, etc. But yeah, just one more vote and we will finally know the truth!

C'mon, just give credit where it is due. The Rs and Trump are simply the only ones who released anything on Epstein.

BTW - I notice you focused on the juicy details from last night and not the lengthy explanation from Acosta's testimony regarding the plea deal and putting much of that nonsense to rest.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Imagine calling Rand Paul principled and not including a laughing, crying emoji.

The eye doctor from Lake Jackson will save us for sure.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

(Wrong thread) Carry on.

Edit: Made a post here that was the wrong thread. But instead of leaving this blank, see something new to
remark on.

This post here,
Quote:

Trump pitching another fit at Paul/Massie. Funny how he's mad that the principled politicians he previously endorsed continue to follow those principles

What did Rand do now to provoke this round?
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

Imagine calling Rand Paul principled and not including a laughing, crying emoji.

The eye doctor from Lake Jackson will save us for sure.


He may not but the real estate magnate from NYC certainly won't
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.