DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list

295,405 Views | 3482 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by agent-maroon
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions said:

flown-the-coop said:

Imagine calling Rand Paul principled and not including a laughing, crying emoji.

The eye doctor from Lake Jackson will save us for sure.


He may not but the real estate magnate from NYC certainly won't


Checks notes… confirms real estate magnate saved us from Hillary then Kamala, ended Irans nuclear program, working on a growing list of world peace deals, created yet another booming economy, restored pride to our military, making our city streets safe again, oh and has both his DOJ and his congressional leaders working to actually release information on Epstein.

But yea, we need Randy to step in to save us.

Too funny. Here is the laughing crying emoji you desired!
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

PaulsBunions said:

flown-the-coop said:

Imagine calling Rand Paul principled and not including a laughing, crying emoji.

The eye doctor from Lake Jackson will save us for sure.


He may not but the real estate magnate from NYC certainly won't


Checks notes… confirms real estate magnate saved us from Hillary then Kamala, ended Irans nuclear program, working on a growing list of world peace deals, created yet another booming economy, restored pride to our military, making our city streets safe again, oh and has both his DOJ and his congressional leaders working to actually release information on Epstein.

But yea, we need Randy to step in to save us.

Too funny. Here is the laughing crying emoji you desired!


You forgot let Fauci run the country in 2020, forced unconstitutional bump stock legislation, and picked incompetent Bondi for DOJ head lol. At least Paul and Massie want less government power. Trump is just as capable of stupid decisions as anybody else.
Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And he got voted out for it. 24 he is in much better position. His staff appears better and looking loyal so far. Still draining swamp so probably hasn't rid us of every one of them.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions said:

flown-the-coop said:

PaulsBunions said:

flown-the-coop said:

Imagine calling Rand Paul principled and not including a laughing, crying emoji.

The eye doctor from Lake Jackson will save us for sure.


He may not but the real estate magnate from NYC certainly won't


Checks notes… confirms real estate magnate saved us from Hillary then Kamala, ended Irans nuclear program, working on a growing list of world peace deals, created yet another booming economy, restored pride to our military, making our city streets safe again, oh and has both his DOJ and his congressional leaders working to actually release information on Epstein.

But yea, we need Randy to step in to save us.

Too funny. Here is the laughing crying emoji you desired!


You forgot let Fauci run the country in 2020, forced unconstitutional bump stock legislation, and picked incompetent Bondi for DOJ head lol. At least Paul and Massie want less government power. Trump is just as capable of stupid decisions as anybody else.


At least he course corrects. Have not seen Massie or Randy have any ability to do so.

And Randy is so against bureaucracy he founded his own certification for eye docs that failed because again he couldn't play well within existing rules and thought he knew best.

Here's your hero, I get it. But to the America First agenda he's a cancer that will be removed. And his little lap dog as well.

Bondi being incompetent as she slams down indictments down like they were Botox shots is sort of funny though. Needed a chuckle.
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:



There have been a number of passenger manifests coming out, most all with some names redacted.

Why? It appears the rich and powerful are still being protected.
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
74OA said:

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:



There have been a number of passenger manifests coming out, most all with some names redacted.

Why? It appears the rich and powerful are still being protected.


Or the names of victims but feel free to assume away
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

74OA said:

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:



There have been a number of passenger manifests coming out, most all with some names redacted.

Why? It appears the rich and powerful are still being protected.


Or the names of victims but feel free to assume away

What else can we do except assume until we finally get full, unredacted release of all the files?
Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
74OA said:

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

74OA said:

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:



There have been a number of passenger manifests coming out, most all with some names redacted.

Why? It appears the rich and powerful are still being protected.


Or the names of victims but feel free to assume away

What else can we do except assume until we finally get full, unredacted release of all the files?


That doesn't protect the victims. Is that an ok casualty in this war? The innocent?
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Deerdude said:

74OA said:

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

74OA said:

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:



There have been a number of passenger manifests coming out, most all with some names redacted.

Why? It appears the rich and powerful are still being protected.


Or the names of victims but feel free to assume away

What else can we do except assume until we finally get full, unredacted release of all the files?


That doesn't protect the victims. Is that an ok casualty in this war? The innocent?

Now you're doing the assuming.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Deerdude said:

74OA said:

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

74OA said:

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:



There have been a number of passenger manifests coming out, most all with some names redacted.

Why? It appears the rich and powerful are still being protected.


Or the names of victims but feel free to assume away

What else can we do except assume until we finally get full, unredacted release of all the files?


That doesn't protect the victims. Is that an ok casualty in this war? The innocent?


https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/epstein-victims-urge-us-congress-pass-bill-requiring-release-documents-2025-09-03/

The victims generally support the release of all of the files.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions said:

Deerdude said:

74OA said:

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

74OA said:

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:



There have been a number of passenger manifests coming out, most all with some names redacted.

Why? It appears the rich and powerful are still being protected.


Or the names of victims but feel free to assume away

What else can we do except assume until we finally get full, unredacted release of all the files?


That doesn't protect the victims. Is that an ok casualty in this war? The innocent?


https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/epstein-victims-urge-us-congress-pass-bill-requiring-release-documents-2025-09-03/

The victims generally support the release of all of the files.


Why have they not provided a list of those they accuse of being there and abusing them?

Also, why do we need a bill passed that does nothing more than what is already being done? Review files, of not part of ongoing investigation, then redact victims names and release?

Hopefully Walter Cronkite is held accountable for his actions.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

PaulsBunions said:

Deerdude said:

74OA said:

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

74OA said:

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:



There have been a number of passenger manifests coming out, most all with some names redacted.

Why? It appears the rich and powerful are still being protected.


Or the names of victims but feel free to assume away

What else can we do except assume until we finally get full, unredacted release of all the files?


That doesn't protect the victims. Is that an ok casualty in this war? The innocent?


https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/epstein-victims-urge-us-congress-pass-bill-requiring-release-documents-2025-09-03/

The victims generally support the release of all of the files.


Why have they not provided a list of those they accuse of being there and abusing them?

Also, why do we need a bill passed that does nothing more than what is already being done? Review files, of not part of ongoing investigation, then redact victims names and release?

Hopefully Walter Cronkite is held accountable for his actions.


Victims don't want to be sued. Also we wouldn't need a bill if the DOJ was doing what you say they are doing lol

(We're at 33.5 weeks now)
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I remember when someone could sue a person for defamation for simply denying bogus allegations against them. Believe all victims, like E Jean Carroll.

If there is enough to corroborate pursuing charges against alleged perpetrator, as the Epstein Files Tabloid Believers do think there is, then the victims need no worry about being sued. So let's just take that nonsense off the table.

Look, I have said to release it all, unredacted. And the reason it has to be a full dump is that there are some who will never, ever be satiated. They will make up reasons why things were redacted or make poor assumptions on redactions, anything they cannot make sense of will be chalked up to conspiracy and coverup. As has been mentioned tons on this very thread, for many there will never be enough information.

Again, the congressional bill, as also pointed out Ted out numerous times, achieves NOTHING new. Even the text and sections validating this have been excerpted and referenced.

Still there is clamor for Massie and his merry band of DNC tabloiders want their name out, Twit clix and camera time.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

I remember when someone could sue a person for defamation for simply denying bogus allegations against them. Believe all victims, like E Jean Carroll.

If there is enough to corroborate pursuing charges against alleged perpetrator, as the Epstein Files Tabloid Believers do think there is, then the victims need no worry about being sued. So let's just take that nonsense off the table.

Look, I have said to release it all, unredacted. And the reason it has to be a full dump is that there are some who will never, ever be satiated. They will make up reasons why things were redacted or make poor assumptions on redactions, anything they cannot make sense of will be chalked up to conspiracy and coverup. As has been mentioned tons on this very thread, for many there will never be enough information.

Again, the congressional bill, as also pointed out Ted out numerous times, achieves NOTHING new. Even the text and sections validating this have been excerpted and referenced.

Still there is clamor for Massie and his merry band of DNC tabloiders want their name out, Twit clix and camera time.


Sure buddy Bondi will release it all underacted any day now
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And you would be on here ridiculing why it took so long and how dare they not redact certain information and how it was done so that no one could ever be prosecuted.

It's okay to admit that it's not about justice.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

And you would be on here ridiculing why it took so long and how dare they not redact certain information and how it was done so that no one could ever be prosecuted.

It's okay to admit that it's not about justice.


Too bad she never will and I'll never be exposed as the hypocrite you think I am.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OPAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions said:

flown-the-coop said:

PaulsBunions said:

flown-the-coop said:

Imagine calling Rand Paul principled and not including a laughing, crying emoji.

The eye doctor from Lake Jackson will save us for sure.


He may not but the real estate magnate from NYC certainly won't


Checks notes… confirms real estate magnate saved us from Hillary then Kamala, ended Irans nuclear program, working on a growing list of world peace deals, created yet another booming economy, restored pride to our military, making our city streets safe again, oh and has both his DOJ and his congressional leaders working to actually release information on Epstein.

But yea, we need Randy to step in to save us.

Too funny. Here is the laughing crying emoji you desired!


You forgot let Fauci run the country in 2020, forced unconstitutional bump stock legislation, and picked incompetent Bondi for DOJ head lol. At least Paul and Massie want less government power. Trump is just as capable of stupid decisions as anybody else.

Either history revision or just plain up ignorance here!

Let's go back a bit and I'll ask you a question.

Who did Trump put in charge of the whole Covid crisis response?

Do you remember or know? I'll wait for your answer.

Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well while everyone wants to point at Trump and Bondi for not releasing names where is this bunch that claimed they were going to release names of their own list???? Crickets

Guess they are covering for the rich and famous too



"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OPAG said:

PaulsBunions said:

flown-the-coop said:

PaulsBunions said:

flown-the-coop said:

Imagine calling Rand Paul principled and not including a laughing, crying emoji.

The eye doctor from Lake Jackson will save us for sure.


He may not but the real estate magnate from NYC certainly won't


Checks notes… confirms real estate magnate saved us from Hillary then Kamala, ended Irans nuclear program, working on a growing list of world peace deals, created yet another booming economy, restored pride to our military, making our city streets safe again, oh and has both his DOJ and his congressional leaders working to actually release information on Epstein.

But yea, we need Randy to step in to save us.

Too funny. Here is the laughing crying emoji you desired!


You forgot let Fauci run the country in 2020, forced unconstitutional bump stock legislation, and picked incompetent Bondi for DOJ head lol. At least Paul and Massie want less government power. Trump is just as capable of stupid decisions as anybody else.

Either history revision or just plain up ignorance here!

Let's go back a bit and I'll ask you a question.

Who did Trump put in charge of the whole Covid crisis response?

Do you remember or know? I'll wait for your answer.




Mike Pence (another excellent pick by DJT) was the chair of the response task force, Fauci was the face of the response.

Do you think the WH took appropriate measures in response to Covid in 2020?
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Along those lines, was it Pence that appointed to the coronavirus task force? Did Pence give Fauci a medal? Was it Pence that could have fired Fauci?

"The buck stops with someone else". He will have an excuse. Don't worry.

Trump screwed up royally in letting Fauci dictate policy . No amount of spin can change that!

If you take away Covid from April 2020 forward I give Trump an "A" for his first term. So spare me the TDS attempts to deflect from reality.

I'm Gipper
OPAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Mike Pence (another excellent pick by DJT) was the chair of the response task force, Fauci was the face of the response.

Do you think the WH took appropriate measures in response to Covid in 2020?

Hindsite is 20/20 yes?

At the time when DJT picked Trump everyone lauded the pick a true red moral conservative Christian.

So many in that first admin where RINO's or compromised. We (and he) didn't know it until later.

There is so much more here than we know as well. The most scary and powerful lobby in the US is the Big Pharma lobby. By far, 4 lobbyist for every Congress critter. The medical mafia is by far and away the most deadly one as well.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

Along those lines, was it Pence that appointed to the coronavirus task force? Did Pence give Fauci a medal? Was it Pence that could have fired Fauci?

"The buck stops with someone else". He will have an excuse. Don't worry.

Trump screwed up royally in letting Fauci dictate policy . No amount of spin can change that!

If you take away Covid from April 2020 forward I give Trump an "A" for his first term. So spare me the TDS attempts to deflect from reality.



"If you take away the parts where he was bad Trump was good!"

Its not TDS to criticize a guy for mistakes. Dude is easily the best president of my lifetime (I voted for him 3 times) but that's only because olds sucked at picking candidates. Trump is not above criticism, and you can't simply wave away criticism as "TDS" just like libs cant wave away criticism as "racist, homophobic, Nazi" etc.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Its not TDS to criticize a guy for mistakes.

Exactly!! I love Trump, but I can also call him out when he does something not good.

But for some, their TDS does not allow them to ever criticize Trump. Nothing is his fault, always an excuse, etc.

TDS is a powerful thing, even the Type B TDS that a handful of posters here have!

I'm Gipper
OPAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bottom line, I would love to see all the 'elite' that were part of the Epstein circle revealed and hammered. However, I live in the real world!

I know that this will never happen. As mentioned just above, how come there has not been a revealing of names by the group of survivors!? Hmmmmm why not?

I'll tell you why not, because one of two things will happen.

1. Those whose names are attached will sue the ever living bejeebers out of them.

2. Many will commit 'suicide' like Virginia Guiffe (sp?). (Yea if you believe she committed suicide I have some really good Nigerian oil deals for you to invest in. LOL}

Furthermore, let us not forget that just because these women claim that they have been used/raped and trafficked by some prominent person, does not mean it's true. Let us not forget the Duke Lacrosse team.

Simple, it's easy to make all kinds of claims, proving it in a court of law (even a civil one) after many years, is an entirely different deal.

I have been around long enough to know that women and girls don't always tell the truth in these scenarios.

I myself have experienced this. Back when I was single and was working as youth pastor, I was confronted because a girl claimed to have had a heavy petting and make out session with me! IT WAS A TOTAL LIE.

In fact when I was confronted, and I asked who this was they were slow to tell me. I forced them to under scriptural mandates. The truth was I hadn't had any physical contact with any girl. So when they gave me the name I said, WHO?! I didn't even know who it was.

Yet, it still took some time for them to clear this and there was talk going on outside the leadership.

False accusations of this nature can be devastating and they go like wild fire.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

1. Those whose names are attached will sue the ever living bejeebers out of them.



Sue who?

I'm Gipper
OPAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

Quote:

1. Those whose names are attached will sue the ever living bejeebers out of them.



Sue who?

Really, dude. Rich and powerful people who are accused of doing something that cannot prove, can make your life a living hell.

Please.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OPAG said:

Bottom line, I would love to see all the 'elite' that were part of the Epstein circle revealed and hammered. However, I live in the real world!

I know that this will never happen. As mentioned just above, how come there has not been a revealing of names by the group of survivors!? Hmmmmm why not?

I'll tell you why not, because one of two things will happen.

1. Those whose names are attached will sue the ever living bejeebers out of them.

2. Many will commit 'suicide' like Virginia Guiffe (sp?). (Yea if you believe she committed suicide I have some really good Nigerian oil deals for you to invest in. LOL}

Furthermore, let us not forget that just because these women claim that they have been used/raped and trafficked by some prominent person, does not mean it's true. Let us not forget the Duke Lacrosse team.

Simple, it's easy to make all kinds of claims, proving it in a court of law (even a civil one) after many years, is an entirely different deal.

I have been around long enough to know that women and girls don't always tell the truth in these scenarios.

I myself have experienced this. Back when I was single and was working as youth pastor, I was confronted because a girl claimed to have had a heavy petting and make out session with me! IT WAS A TOTAL LIE.

In fact when I was confronted, and I asked who this was they were slow to tell me. I forced them to under scriptural mandates. The truth was I hadn't had any physical contact with any girl. So when they gave me the name I said, WHO?! I didn't even know who it was.

Yet, it still took some time for them to clear this and there was talk going on outside the leadership.

False accusations of this nature can be devastating and they go like wild fire.


That's why the government should release what they have to corroborate victim's testimony. The allegations against you were baseless, the allegations by the Epstein victim's aren't. The problem is Trump doesn't want the files released (probably because some donor or ally would be embarrassed) so Bondi isn't doing anything with it. Right now its up to Trump to tell Bondi to do the right thing but he isn't doing it for some reason.

Massie's HR is the only alternative, but Mike Johnson decided to send the house to a recess (delaying the signatures for a month) then delayed the swearing in of the 218th vote before the shutdown. So the "most transparent admin in history" is not being so transparent after all. Its not TDS to criticize Trump for how this whole mess was handled, and Massie doesn't have TDS for seeking transparency from the federal government.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OPAG said:

Im Gipper said:

Quote:

1. Those whose names are attached will sue the ever living bejeebers out of them.



Sue who?

Really, dude. Rich and powerful people who are accused of doing something that cannot prove, can make your life a living hell.

Please.

Really dude, you didn't answer the question!

Who are they going to sue if the FBI releases all its files? And for what?

Any case against the FBI would be quickly dismissed.

I'm Gipper
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think he's saying the victims haven't released the names because of the fear of the lawsuit, not the FBI.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ahh! Gotcha!

I'm Gipper
OPAG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PaulsBunions said:

OPAG said:

Bottom line, I would love to see all the 'elite' that were part of the Epstein circle revealed and hammered. However, I live in the real world!

I know that this will never happen. As mentioned just above, how come there has not been a revealing of names by the group of survivors!? Hmmmmm why not?

I'll tell you why not, because one of two things will happen.

1. Those whose names are attached will sue the ever living bejeebers out of them.

2. Many will commit 'suicide' like Virginia Guiffe (sp?). (Yea if you believe she committed suicide I have some really good Nigerian oil deals for you to invest in. LOL}

Furthermore, let us not forget that just because these women claim that they have been used/raped and trafficked by some prominent person, does not mean it's true. Let us not forget the Duke Lacrosse team.

Simple, it's easy to make all kinds of claims, proving it in a court of law (even a civil one) after many years, is an entirely different deal.

I have been around long enough to know that women and girls don't always tell the truth in these scenarios.

I myself have experienced this. Back when I was single and was working as youth pastor, I was confronted because a girl claimed to have had a heavy petting and make out session with me! IT WAS A TOTAL LIE.

In fact when I was confronted, and I asked who this was they were slow to tell me. I forced them to under scriptural mandates. The truth was I hadn't had any physical contact with any girl. So when they gave me the name I said, WHO?! I didn't even know who it was.

Yet, it still took some time for them to clear this and there was talk going on outside the leadership.

False accusations of this nature can be devastating and they go like wild fire.


That's why the government should release what they have to corroborate victim's testimony. The allegations against you were baseless, the allegations by the Epstein victim's aren't. The problem is Trump doesn't want the files released (probably because some donor or ally would be embarrassed) so Bondi isn't doing anything with it. Right now its up to Trump to tell Bondi to do the right thing but he isn't doing it for some reason.

Massie's HR is the only alternative, but Mike Johnson decided to send the house to a recess (delaying the signatures for a month) then delayed the swearing in of the 218th vote before the shutdown. So the "most transparent admin in history" is not being so transparent after all. Its not TDS to criticize Trump for how this whole mess was handled, and Massie doesn't have TDS for seeking transparency from the federal government.

Ahh, how do you know, (you have already been judge and jury!). What if there names mentioned there that really did nothing!?

Again, making accusations is easy, proving it and making it stick is an entirely different deal.

And I am not getting into other troubling issues. Virginia G was like what 17 when she got into this?

That age of consent in Texas and many other states. Shoot we had 16 year olds getting married commonly not that long ago!

Anyone trying to tell me a 16 year old girl (even younger) is not aware of their sexuality and know how to use it, is an idiot!

Now, we also have the very real possibility of a lot fabricated stuff added to this as well. and now it is doubly difficult to separate truth from lies and lives can be destroyed.

This is not a simple issue, at all. It is complex, and proving anything here is going to be very hard.

As for me, if I was just a simple youth pastor who had know knowledge of the law (both secular and scripture) my life would of been totally screwed over. There was some residue left even after everything was resolved. (the girl admitted it was not true) but the gossip had already gone outside the camp.

This why 'bearing false witness against some one is one of the ten most vile sins. It is absolutely horrid.



Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions said:

I think he's saying the victims haven't released the names because of the fear of the lawsuit, not the FBI.


Yet they stood out on the capitol steps claiming solidarity and claimed they would release their own names and crickets. It's all for show. If they were actually real victims they have nothing to fear except fear itself. Testify under oath not simply making claims at some podium. Their own testimony is evidence. Names places times and dates. Epstein is a known scumbag who liked underage girls. Their story will be hard to disprove. And the last thing anyone wants is to be caught up in legal discovery, everyone has skeletons in their closet. There are no water walkers in this deal.
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.